Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationship between eGFR and reversion to normoglycemia in patients with IFG in different models

From: Association between estimated glomerular filtration rate and reversion to normoglycemia in people with impaired fasting glucose: a 5-year retrospective cohort study

Exposure

Model I (HR, 95%CI, P)

Model II (HR, 95%CI, P)

Model III (HR, 95%CI, P)

Model IV (HR, 95%CI, P)

eGFR

1.013 (1.011, 1.014) < 0.0001

1.009 (1.008, 1.011) < 0.0001

1.008 (1.006, 1.009) < 0.0001

1.007 (1.006, 1.008) < 0.0001

eGFR (SD)

1.219 (1.195, 1.243) < 0.0001

1.158 (1.135, 1.181) < 0.0001

1.126 (1.102, 1.150) < 0.0001

1.118 (1.094, 1.142) < 0.0001

eGFR Quartile

    

 Q1

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 Q2

1.063 (1.004, 1.125) 0.0353

1.025 (0.969, 1.085) 0.3897

1.011 (0.954, 1.070) 0.7190

1.015 (0.959, 1.075) 0.6066

 Q3

1.188 (1.124, 1.255) < 0.0001

1.116 (1.055, 1.180) 0.0001

1.072 (1.013, 1.135) 0.0164

1.070 (1.011, 1.134) 0.0197

 Q4

1.619 (1.537, 1.707) < 0.0001

1.423 (1.348, 1.502) < 0.0001

1.314 (1.241, 1.391) < 0.0001

1.295 (1.222, 1.372) < 0.0001

P for trend

 < 0.0001

 < 0.0001

 < 0.0001

 < 0.0001

  1. Model I: we did not adjust other covariates
  2. Model II: we adjust BMI, SBP, gender, family history of diabetes, DBP, smoking and drinking status
  3. Model III: we adjust gender, SBP, BMI, FPG, family history of diabetes, DBP, BUN, TG, AST, LDL-c, ALT, HDL-c, smoking and drinking status
  4. Model IV: we adjusted gender, family history of diabetes, BMI (smooth), TG (smooth), DBP (smooth), FPG (smooth), SBP (smooth), BUN (smooth), HDL-c (smooth), ALT (smooth), LDL-c (smooth), AST (smooth), smoking and drinking status
  5. HR Hazard ratios, CI confidence, Ref. reference, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min·1.73 m2), SD standard deviation