Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics and main findings of the included studies

From: Assessing the association between triglyceride-glucose index and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Groups

Population

AF definition

Country

Study design

Sample size

Male%

Mean age

LVEF (%)

TyG index

Main findings

Wei et al. [34]

AF

Patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after septal myectomy

POAF: Presence of AF lasting ≥ 5min or requiring cardioversion with antiarrhythmic drugs

China

Prospective cohort

61

52.5

56.75 ± 12.35

67.07 ± 6.73

7.41 ± 0.67

TyG index was an independent risk factor for POAF in patients undergoing septal myectomy (OR: 4.218, 95% CI 2.381–7.473, P < 0.001)

Non-AF

348

52.0

49.92 ± 10.85

67.41 ± 6.34

6.9 ± 0.55

Ling et al. [29]

NOAF after PCI

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

NOAF: AF lasting ≥ 30 s during post-PCI hospitalization that spontaneously reverted to sinus rhythm or responded to drug cardioversion

China

Retrospective cohort

42

71.4

69.5 ± 4.7

49.17 ± 8.21

9.48 ± 0.75

The TyG index was an independent predictor of NOAF [OR: 8.884, 95% CI 1.570–50.265, P = 0.014]

No AF after PCI

507

80.5

63 ± 10

51.35 ± 6.69

8.75 ± 0.64

Tang et al. [33]

Late AF recurrence

Patients with AF who underwent RFCA

Long-standing persistent AF: persistent AF (lasting more than 7 days) episodes lasting > 12 months

China

Prospective cohort

70

75.7

64.38 ± 8.04

63.66 ± 5.0

9.42 ± 0.6

The pre-ablation TyG index was an independent risk factor for late recurrence of AF after RFCA (HR: 2.015, 95%CI 1.408–4.117; P = 0.009)

Non-late AF recurrence

205

67.3

55.07 ± 8.93

64.20 ± 5.2

8.68 ± 0.7

Zhang et al. [36]

NAFLD + AF

Patients diagnosed with NAFLD by ultrasound

AF: a ≥ 30-s rhythm of the heart, undiscernible repetitive P-waves, and irregular RR intermittent diagnosis of AF)/self-reporting AF

China

Case control

204

64.7

68.78 ± 11.15

–

9.12 ± 0.53

TyG was an independent risk factor for AF (OR: 4.84, 95%CI 2.98–7.88, P < 0.001)

Only NAFLD

708

60.6

56.25 ± 10.31

–

8.01 ± 0.44

Chen et al. [28]

AF

Patients from the department of cardiology

AF: ECG findings (absence of consistent P-waves, presence of rapid, irregular f waves with a frequency of 350–600 b.p.m. and an irregular ventricular response)

China

Retrospective observational

179

53.1

68 ± 2.22

–

8.53 ± 0.17

TyG index was associated with AF (OR:

3.065, 95% CI 1.819–5.166, P < 0.001) in nondiabetic subjects. However, the TyG index was not associated with AF in the diabetic subjects

No AF (control)

179

51.4

67 ± 2.22

–

8.36 ± 0.17

Shi et al. [32]

AF

Diabetic patients

AF: of ≥ 30 s showing heart rhythm with no discernible repeating P-waves and irregular RR intervals was diagnosed of AF/the subject’s self-report of AF history

China

Cross-sectional

213

72.3

55.97 ± 13.25

–

9.51 ± 0.74

There was a linear correlation between the TyG index and the prevalent AF in a diabetic population. In the fully adjusted model, each SD elevation of TyG casts a 40.6% additional risk for prevalent AF

No AF (control)

3031

53.65

56.21 ± 10.67

–

9.17 ± 0.67

Zhang et al. [35]

Recurrent AF

Patients who underwent valvular surgery with concurrent Cox-maze ablation

Long-standing persistent AF: persistent AF (lasting more than 7 days) episodes lasting > 12 months

China

Case control

117

71.8

61.7 ± 12.7

50.1 ± 14.8

9.21 ± 0.38

A higher TyG index is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence after simultaneous radiofrequency ablation maze IV procedures for heart valve surgery (HR: 2.021, 95% CI 1.374–3.245, P < 0.001)

Non-recurrent AF

307

70.4

56.8 ± 13.7

53.4 ± 17.6

8.34 ± 0.72

Liu et al. [30]

TyG < 8.8

General population without known cardiovascular disease

AF: Fatal AF, AF event at visit 2, 3, 4, or 5 determined by ECG, AF determined by hospital discharge codes

USA

Prospective cohort

7605

40.3

53.61 ± 5.73

–

8.30 ± 0.32

. In multivariable-adjusted analysis, both < 8.80 (aHR:1.15, 95% CI 1.02–1.29) and > 9.20 levels (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03–1.37) of the TyG index were associated with an increased risk of AF compared with the middle TyG index category (8.80–9.20)

8.8 ≤ TyG ≤ 9.2

2477

49.9

54.65 ± 5.75

–

8.98 ± 0.12

9.2 < TyG

1769

54.4

55.08 ± 5.54

–

9.57 ± 0.32

Muhammad et al. [31]

TyG Q1

General population

–

Sweden

Prospective cohort

8221

50.1

46.41 ± 7.73

–

3.38 to 4.38

No significant association was observed between AF and TyG index [aHR 0.99, 95%CI 0.89–1.11, P = 0.142]

TyG Q2

8232

65

45.69 ± 7.48

–

4.38 to 4.55

TyG Q3

8232

72.7

45.24 ± 7.44

–

4.55 to 4.74

TyG Q4

8214

82.1

45.26 ± 6.92

–

4.74 to 6.70

  1. AF atrial fibrillation, TyG triglyceride-glucose index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, NOAF new-onset atrial fibrillation, POAF post-operative atrial fibrillation, RFCA radiofrequency catheter ablation, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, ECG electrocardiogram