Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of AF in different groups/levels of the TyG index

From: Assessing the association between triglyceride-glucose index and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Year

Population

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Continuous

Population-based cohorts

 Liu et al

2023

Population-based cohort of 15,792 patients aged 45 to 64 from 4 US communities

TyG < 8.8 [aHR 1.15] [95% CI 1.02 to 1.29]*

8.8 < TyG < 9.2 [Ref]

9.2 < TyG [aHR 1.18] [95% CI 1.03 to 1.37]*

–

–

 Muhammad et al

2022

General population

Q1 [Ref]

Q2 [aHR 1.02] [95% CI 0.95 to 1.09]

Q3 [aHR 0.97] [95% CI 0.9 to 1.04]

Q4 [aHR 0.96] [95% CI 0.89 to 1.04]

Per 1-unit increase [aHR 0.99] [95% CI 0.89 to 1.11]

Coronary artery disease

 Ling et al

2022

ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

–

–

–

–

Per 1-unit increase [OR 8.884] [95% CI 1.57 to 50.265]***

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

 Zhang et al

2023

Patients diagnosed with NAFLD by ultrasound

Q1 [Ref]

Q2 [OR 1.2] [95% CI 0.66 to 2.17]

Q3 [OR 1.93] [95% CI 1.07 to 3.49]*

Q4 [OR 4.34] [95% CI 2.37 to 7.94]***

Per 1-unit increase [OR 4.84] [95% CI 2.98 to 7.88]***

Atrial fibrillation recurrence

 Tang et al

2022

Patients with AF who underwent RFCA

–

–

–

–

Per 1-unit increase [HR 2.015] [95% CI 1.408 to 4.117]**

  1. HR hazard ratio, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, AF atrial fibrillation, RFCA radio frequency catheter ablation
  2. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001