Association between 3D membranous urethral parameters and urinary continence recovery after RARP

Table 1 Univariate and multivariate regression analysis of patients achieving continence immediately after removing catheter and those who cannot

	Total	Patients achieving continence immediately after removing catheter group		Patients failed to achieve continence after removing catheter group		P	Multivariate
	Total						OR	95%CI	P
No. of patients (%)	120	27 (22.5)		93 (77.5)
		Mean	SD	Mean	SD
Age (years)		67.59	6.90	69.78	5.24	0.078
BMI (kg/m²)		23.21	2.61	23.47	2.62	0.546
tMUV (mm³)		1533.02	466.30	1299.02	460.79	0.038	1.000	0.998–1.002	0.704
eMUV (mm³)		1014.39	267.99	830.14	280.20	0.003	1.002	1.001–1.004	0.004
fMUL (mm)		19.65	2.10	18.41	2.71	0.025	1.045	0.823–1.326	0.718
eMUL (mm)		13.62	2.41	12.69	2.01	0.044	1.003	0.998–1.008	0.247
PV (cc)		38.97	27.90	35.16	22.37	0.927
VPSS		9.00	0.91	10.14	0.42	0.095

The statistically significant p values in the table are shown in bold
BMI body mass index, OR odd ratio, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, tMUV total membranous urethral complex volume, eMUV exposed membranous urethral complex volume, fMUL full membranous urethral length, eMUL exposed membranous urethral length, PV prostate volume, VPSS visual prostate symptom score

ISSN: 2047-783X