Fig. 3From: Assessment and clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for suspected lower respiratory tract infectionsComparison of mNGS and CMT results and consistency comparison. A The 2 × 2 contingency tables comparing the performance of mNGS relative to CMT of 125 samples. Bar plots illustrating the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of mNGS and CMT in identifying pathogens in different sample types with the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. B Comparison of mNGS and conventional tests resultsBack to article page