Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between MG and US for agreement rates for lesion size and location

From: Limitations of mammography in the diagnosis of breast diseases compared with ultrasonography: a single-center retrospective analysis of 274 cases

Variable

Lesion size

 

Lesion location

 
 

MG

US

P value

MG

US

P value

All

131/274 (47.8%)

217/274 (79.2%)

<0.001

128/274 (46.7%)

250/274 (91.2%)

<0.001

Age ≤45

55/129 (42.6%)

100/129 (77.5%)

<0.001

52/129 (40.3%)

116/129 (89.9%)

<0.001

Age >45

76/145 (52.4%)

117/145 (80.7%)

<0.001

76/145 (52.4%)

134/145 (92.4%)

<0.001

Premenopausal

82/185 (44.3%)

144/185 (77.8%)

<0.001

81/185 (43.8%)

167/185 (90.3%)

<0.001

Postmenopausal

49/89 (55.1%)

73/89 (82%)

<0.001

47/89 (52.8%)

83/89 (93.3%)

<0.001

Low breast density

74/133 (55.6%)

109/133 (82.0%)

<0.001

67/133 (50.4%)

123/133 (92.5%)

<0.001

High breast density

57/141 (40.4%)

108/141 (76.6%)

<0.001

61/141 (43.3%)

127/141 (90.1%)

<0.001

Lesion <2 cm

46/122 (37.7%)

102/122 (83.6%)

<0.001

43/122 (35.2%)

111/122 (91.0%)

<0.001

Lesion 2.1 to 5 cm

79/135 (58.5%)

108/135 (80.0%)

<0.001

74/135 (54.8%)

123/135 (91.1%)

<0.001

Lesion >5 cm

6/17 (35.3%)

7/17 (41.2%)

0.724

11/17 (64.7%)

16/17 (94.1%)

0.09

  1. MG, mammography; US, ultrasonography.