Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | European Journal of Medical Research

Fig. 3

From: The 3-dimensional miniplate is more effective than the standard miniplate for the management of mandibular fractures: a meta-analysis

Fig. 3

Forest plots of the effect comparisons between standard miniplate and 3-dimensional (3D) miniplate. a Infection; b malocclusion; c hardware failure; d nonunion/malunion; e wound dehiscence; f paresthesia. Squares represent the study-specific relative risk (RR) estimates, and the size of square reflects the study-specific weight. Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the summary RRs with corresponding 95% CI

Back to article page