Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics

From: Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?

Patient characteristics

Age >75 years only curative intent (n = 24)

Age >75 years only palliative intent (n = 8)

Age ≤75 years

(n = 39)

p valuea

%

Median

%

Median

%

Median

 

(IQR 25–75)

 

(IQR 25–75)

 

(IQR 25–75)

Sex

1.000

 Male (%)

66.7

 

62.5

 

66.7

  

Age in years

 

81

 

83

 

66

<0.001

(78–85)

 

(79–84)

 

(59–72)

ECOG

<0.001

 0

17.4

 

28.6

 

73.0

  

 1

78.3

 

57.1

 

27.0

  

 2

4.3

 

14.3

 

0.0

  

ACCI

 

7

 

8

 

4

<0.001

(6–8)

 

(6–9)

 

(4–5)

Histology

0.006

 SCC (%)

79.2

 

66.7

 

100.0

  

 Adenocarcinoma (%)

20.8

 

33.3

 

0.0

  

Primary tumor extension

0.353

 cT1 (%)

12.5

 

0

 

8.1

  

 cT2 (%)

4.2

 

37.5

 

5.4

  

 cT3 (%)

83.3

 

62.5

 

75.7

  

 cT4 (%)

0

 

0

 

10.8

  

Lymph node extension

0.721

 cN+ (%)

83.3

 

100

 

87.2

  

Distant metastasis

0.268

 M1 (%)

0

 

25

 

8.3

  

UICC-stage

0.239

 IA (%)

8.3

 

0

 

0

  

 IIA (%)

8.3

 

0

 

11.1

  

 IIB (%)

8.3

 

37.5

 

11.1

  

 IIIA (%)

75

 

50

 

61,1

  

 IIIC (%)

0

 

0

 

8.3

  

 IV (%)

0

 

12.5

 

8.3

  

Grading

0.492

 G1 (%)

4.2

 

0

 

0.0

  

 G2 (%)

50

 

25

 

57.1

  

 G3 (%)

45.8

 

75

 

42.9

  

Tumor localization

0.195

 Upper third (%)

26.1

 

25

 

42.1

  

 Middle third (%)

43.5

 

50

 

23.7

  

 Lower third (%)

30.4

 

25

 

34.2

  

Tumor length (centimeter)

 

5

 

7

 

5

0.245

(3–7)

 

(5–9)

 

(5–7)

Discontinuation of treatment (%)

0.0

 

60

 

0.0

  

Simultaneous chemotherapy (%)

41.7

 

37.5

 

82.1

 

0.002

EQD2 (Gy)

 

54

 

40

 

53

0.417

(53–55)

 

(19–46)

 

(53–54)

Overall dose (Gy)

 

54

 

38

 

54

0.860

(54–56)

 

(20–45)

 

(54–54)

Daily dose (Gy)

 

1.8

 

2.0

 

1.8

0.127

(1.8–2)

 

(1.8–2.5)

 

(1.8–1.8)

  1. The most common side effect was dysphagia. All of the elderly patients and more than 84% of the younger patients described some kind of dysphagia. No significant differences were seen for acute hematological toxicities and dysphagia when comparing younger patients with all elderly patients, as seen in the case when younger patients are compared with elderly patients with only curative intent (Tables 2, 3)
  2. SCC squamous cell carcinoma, EQD2 2 Gy equivalent dose, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, ACCI age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity Index
  3. a p value refers to the comparison between younger patients and elderly patients with curative intent