Skip to main content

Table 1 Intubation characteristics; intubation times

From: Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins

 

Manikin A

Manikin B

Manikin C

Mean

SEM

p-value*

Mean

SEM

p-value*

Mean

SEM

p-value*

Time to view

 Direct laryngoscopy

4.6

1.0

 

6.6

1.1

 

9.5

2.7

 

 Storz cMac

6.2

1.0

.064

7.1

1.4

.673

10.0

2.5

.752

 Storz dBlade

4.1

.5

.608

3.5

.3

.005

3.2

.3

.017

 Ambu King Vision

4.2

.6

.712

4.1

.7

.039

3.6

.4

.027

Time to intubation

 Direct laryngoscopy

9.4

1.4

 

13.2

2.3

 

17.5

3.2

 

 Storz cMac

12.7

2.3

.090

10.6

1.9

.116

16.4

3.3

.875

 Storz dBlade

13.2

3.8

.175

10.2

1.3

.229

8.5

1.5

.016

 Ambu King Vision

13.7

3.1

.043

10.4

2.2

.296

11.5

1.9

.086

Tube handling time

 Direct laryngoscopy

4.6

.9

 

6.6

1.6

 

6.9

1.4

 

 Storz cMac

6.2

1.7

.336

4.6

1.1

.149

8.5

2.0

.682

 Storz dBlade

8.7

3.4

.157

6.8

1.2

.641

5.3

1.4

.385

 Ambu King Vision

9.1

2.7

.031

6.3

1.7

.898

8.0

1.9

.999

  1. * Level of significance compared to direct laryngoscopy at the same manikin