Fully digital data processing during cardiovascular implantable electronic device follow-up in a high-volume tertiary center

Table 2 Types and manufacturers of cardiac devices included in the study

	Manual data processing (n = 126)	Fully digital data processing (n = 265)	p value
Device type
Single chamber P (n; %)	8 (6)	27 (10)	0.21^a
Dual chamber P (n; %)	43 (34)	95 (36)	0.74^a
Single chamber ICD (n; %)	46 (37)	77 (29)	0.14^a
Dual chamber ICD (n; %)	12 (10)	19 (7)	0.42^a
CRT-P (n; %)	2 (2)	0 (0)	0.10^b
CRT-D (n; %)	15 (12)	47 (18)	0.14^a
Device manufacturer
Biotronik (n; %)	6 (5)	17 (6)	0.52^a
Boston Scientific (n; %)	31 (25)	25 (9)	< 0.0001 ^a
LivaNova (Ela/Sorin) (n; %)	9 (7)	4 (2)	0.006 ^b
Medtronic (n; %)	56 (44)	155 (58)	0.009 ^a
St. Jude Medical (n; %)	22 (17)	63 (24)	0.16^a
Vitatron (n; %)	2 (2)	1 (< 1)	0.24^b

Italic values indicate statistically significant associations
CRT cardiac resynchronization therapy device, D defibrillator, ICD implantable cardioverter defibrillator, P pacemaker
^aChi-square test (two-tailed test)
^bFisher’s exact test (two-tailed test)