Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of results, comparison of BMS vs. DES

From: Direct comparison of coronary bare metal vs. drug-eluting stents: same platform, different mechanics?

  PRO-Kinetic Energy
3.0/15
Orsiro
3.0/15
MULTI-LINK 8
3.0/15
XIENCE Xpedition
3.0/15
REBEL Monorail
3.0/16
Promus PREMIER
3.0/16
Integrity
3.0/15
Resolute Integrity
3.0/15
Kaname
3.0/15
Ultimaster
3.0/15
Outer diameter of crimped system (mm) 0.97 ± 0.01 1.02 ± 0.01 1.09 ± 0.01 1.10 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.01 1.07 ± 0.01 1.09 ± 0.01 1.13 ± 0.01 1.13 ± 0.01
Crossability (N)
 Stenosis 1.1 mm 0.034 ± 0.001 0.142 ± 0.017 a 0.258 ± 0.036 0.098 ± 0.014 0.287 ± 0.045 a a a a
 Stenosis 1.2 mm      0.089 ±0.014        0.255 ±0.011 0.294 ±0.044 a 0.409 b
Bending stiffness (Nmm2)
 With crimped stent 22.8 ± 3.0 34.3 ± 3.2 42.7 ± 3.6 38.2 ± 2.3 31.6 ± 2.1 30.5 ± 2.8 59.2 ± 4.7 98.7 ± 8.6 36.4 ± 2.0 33.3 ± 2.2
 Expanded stent 8.9 ± 1.4 8.8 ± 0.9 9.6 ± 1.4 11.0 ± 1.4 3.6 ± 0.9 4.0 ± 0.7 7.5 ± 0.1 7.7 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.3 4.4 ± 0.2
Elastic recoil (%) 5.34 ± 0.36 4.07 ± 0.22 5.00 ± 0.31 5.12 ± 0.19 5.87 ± 0.54 5.15 ± 0.71 5.61 ± 0.53 5.70 ± 0.26 5.27 ± 0.57 5.19 ± 0.18
Scaffolding, open cell diameter (mm) 0.910 ± 0.163 0.958 ± 0.058 0.836 ± 0.023 1.008 ± 0.024 0.822 ± 0.015 0.820 ± 0.035 0.610 ± 0.015 0.855 ± 0.055 0.756 ± 0.03 0.751 ±  0.041
  1. aNot able to pass the stenosis model with specified diameter
  2. bOnly one system has passed the stenosis model with d = 1.2 mm