Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of results, comparison of BMS vs. DES

From: Direct comparison of coronary bare metal vs. drug-eluting stents: same platform, different mechanics?

 

PRO-Kinetic Energy

3.0/15

Orsiro

3.0/15

MULTI-LINK 8

3.0/15

XIENCE Xpedition

3.0/15

REBEL Monorail

3.0/16

Promus PREMIER

3.0/16

Integrity

3.0/15

Resolute Integrity

3.0/15

Kaname

3.0/15

Ultimaster

3.0/15

Outer diameter of crimped system (mm)

0.97

± 0.01

1.02

± 0.01

1.09

± 0.01

1.10

± 0.01

1.05

± 0.01

1.05

± 0.01

1.07

± 0.01

1.09

± 0.01

1.13

± 0.01

1.13

± 0.01

Crossability (N)

 Stenosis 1.1 mm

0.034

± 0.001

0.142

± 0.017

a

0.258

± 0.036

0.098

± 0.014

0.287

± 0.045

a

a

a

a

 Stenosis 1.2 mm

    

0.089

±0.014

      

0.255

±0.011

0.294

±0.044

a

0.409

b

Bending stiffness (Nmm2)

 With crimped stent

22.8

± 3.0

34.3

± 3.2

42.7

± 3.6

38.2

± 2.3

31.6

± 2.1

30.5

± 2.8

59.2

± 4.7

98.7

± 8.6

36.4

± 2.0

33.3

± 2.2

 Expanded stent

8.9

± 1.4

8.8

± 0.9

9.6

± 1.4

11.0

± 1.4

3.6

± 0.9

4.0

± 0.7

7.5

± 0.1

7.7

± 0.1

4.3

± 0.3

4.4

± 0.2

Elastic recoil (%)

5.34

± 0.36

4.07

± 0.22

5.00

± 0.31

5.12

± 0.19

5.87

± 0.54

5.15

± 0.71

5.61

± 0.53

5.70

± 0.26

5.27

± 0.57

5.19

± 0.18

Scaffolding, open cell diameter (mm)

0.910

± 0.163

0.958

± 0.058

0.836

± 0.023

1.008

± 0.024

0.822

± 0.015

0.820

± 0.035

0.610

± 0.015

0.855

± 0.055

0.756

± 0.03

0.751

±  0.041

  1. aNot able to pass the stenosis model with specified diameter
  2. bOnly one system has passed the stenosis model with d = 1.2 mm