Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical data of c-TCD RLS classification between two groups

From: PFO morphology for evaluation of c-TCD and c-TTE RLS grades

Characteristics

c-TCD RLS classification

t/Z/χ2

P

RLS < 2 (n = 100)

RLS ≥ 2 (n = 24)

Gender(Male:Female)

50:50

8:16

2.160

0.142

Age

48.13 ± 12.89

54.58 ± 14.08

2.163

0.032

BMI

23.76 ± 3.42

23.13 ± 3.13

0.826

0.410

Left ventricular EF% value

69.86 ± 4.31

69.42 ± 3.96

0.459

0.647

Hypertension

29 (29.0)

7 (29.2)

0.000

0.987

Diabetes

9 (9.0)

1 (4.2)

0.132

0.716

Hyperlipidemia

29 (29.0)

4 (16.7)

1.507

0.220

Unexplained stroke

20 (20.0)

4 (16.7)

0.007

0.933

Smoking

19 (19.0)

2 (8.3)

0.899

0.343

Drinking

5 (5.0)

2 (8.3)

0.020

0.886

Migraine

30 (30.0)

10 (41.7)

1.206

0.272

Dizziness/syncope

42 (42.0)

8 (33.3)

0.604

0.437

Chest tightness

8 (8.0)

2 (8.3)

0.000

1.000

Right atrial height of the PFO

1.50 (1.10, 2.60)

2.90 (1.50, 3.28)

−3.768

 < 0.001

Left atrial height of the PFO

1.70 (1.20, 2.75)

2.45 (1.50, 3.18)

−2.287

0.022

PFO tunnel length

8.55 (6.90, 10.20)

6.80 (5.73, 8.45)

−2.980

0.003

septum secundum thickness

4.80 (3.83, 6.20)

4.20 (3.18, 5.50)

−1.307

0.191

PFO Types

  

4.482

0.206

SUT

20 (20.0)

1 (4.2)

  

GUT

42 (42.0)

13 (54.2)

  

Right funnelform

17 (17.0)

6 (25.0)

  

Left funnelform

21 (21.0)

4 (16.7)

  

IAS mobility distance

3.00 (2.00,5.00)

4.50 (3.00,6.00)

−1.628

0.104

PFO angle

20.25 ± 7.19

20.29 ± 7.21

0.025

0.980

RoEP score

6.09 ± 1.96

5.54 ± 1.82

1.250

0.214