Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of clinical data of c-TCD RLS grading between two groups

From: PFO morphology for evaluation of c-TCD and c-TTE RLS grades

Characteristics

c-TCD RLS classification

t/Z/χ2

P

RLS < 2 (n = 19)

RLS ≥ 2 (n = 105)

Gender(Male:Female)

11:8

47:58

1.115

0.291

Age

47.84 ± 13.88

49.66 ± 13.27

0.545

0.587

BMI

23.99 ± 3.54

23.58 ± 3.35

0.495

0.621

Left ventricular EF% value

70.32 ± 3.97

69.68 ± 4.29

0.604

0.547

Hypertension

7 (36.8)

29 (27.6)

0.664

0.415

Diabetes

1 (5.3)

9 (8.6)

0.001

0.976

Hyperlipidemia

8 (42.1)

25 (23.8)

2.757

0.097

Unexplained stroke

6 (31.6)

18 (17.1)

1.323

0.250

Smoking

6 (31.6)

15 (14.3)

2.301

0.129

Drinking

0 (0.0)

7 (6.7)

0.383

0.536

Migraine

3 (15.8)

37 (35.2)

2.785

0.095

Dizziness/syncope

9 (47.4)

41 (39.0)

0.463

0.496

Chest tightness

1 (5.3)

9 (8.6)

0.001

0.976

Right atrial height of the PFO

1.1 (0.8,1.2)

2.1 (1.3,2.8)

−4.435

 < 0.001

Left atrial height of the PFO

1.3(1.1,1.4)

2.1 (1.25,3)

−2.737

0.006

PFO tunnel length

8.9 (6.5,11.5)

7.9 (6.5,9.7)

−1.332

0.183

septum secundum thickness

9.3 (4.9,10.5)

4.3 (3.75,5.5)

−3.707

 < 0.001

PFO Types

  

20.262

 < 0.001

SUT

11 (57.9)

10 (9.5)

  

GUT

5 (26.3)

50 (47.6)

  

Right funnelform

1 (5.3)

22 (21.0)

  

Left funnelform

2 (10.5)

23 (21.9)

  

IAS mobility distance

2.00 (1.00,2.00)

5.00 (2.00,6.00)

−4.792

 < 0.001

PFO angle

18.95 ± 6.82

20.50 ± 7.23

0.866

0.388

RoEP score

5.68 ± 1.95

6.04 ± 1.94

0.733

0.465