Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of the influence of c-TCD RLS classification
From: PFO morphology for evaluation of c-TCD and c-TTE RLS grades
Factors | B | SE | Waldχ2 | P | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAS mobility distance | 0.707 | 0.229 | 9.556 | 0.002 | 2.029 (1.296 ~ 3.177) |
PFO Types | – | – | 7.758 | 0.051 | – |
GUT | – | – | – | – | 1.000 |
SUT | 1.252 | 0.704 | 3.163 | 0.075 | 3.498 (0.880 ~ 13.901) |
Right funnelform | 2.597 | 1.181 | 4.839 | 0.028 | 13.428 (1.327 ~ 135.860) |
Left funnelform | 1.732 | 0.933 | 3.449 | 0.063 | 5.655 (0.909 ~ 35.192) |
Constant | -1.259 | 0.603 | 4.365 | 0.037 | – |