Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of clinical data of c-TTE RLS classification between two groups

From: PFO morphology for evaluation of c-TCD and c-TTE RLS grades

Characteristics

c-TTE RLS classification

t/Z/χ2

P

RLS < 2 (n = 104)

RLS ≥ 2 (n = 20)

Gender(Male:Female)

51:53

7:13

1.328

0.249

Age

48.62 ± 13.10

53.35 ± 14.08

1.463

0.146

BMI

23.79 ± 3.40

22.87 ± 3.15

1.121

0.264

Left ventricular EF% value

69.71 ± 4.41

70.10 ± 3.23

0.374

0.709

Hypertension

29 (27.9)

7(35.0)

0.412

0.521

Diabetes

9 (8.7)

1(5.0)

0.010

0.919

Hyperlipidemia

29 (27.9)

4 (20.0)

0.534

0.465

Unexplained stroke

20 (19.2)

4 (20.0)

0.000

1.000

Smoking

19 (18.3)

2 (10.0)

0.333

0.564

Drinking

5 (4.8)

2 (10.0)

0.154

0.695

Migraine

33 (31.7)

7 (35.0)

0.082

0.775

Dizziness/syncope

41 (39.4)

9 (45.0)

0.217

0.641

Chest tightness

10 (9.6)

0 (0.0)

0.996

0.318

Right atrial height of the PFO

1.40 (1.10, 2.60)

2.90 (2.10, 3.45)

−4.350

 < 0.001

Left atrial height of the PFO

1.80 (1.20, 2.98)

2.15 (1.33, 2.70)

−0.997

0.319

PFO tunnel length

8.00 (6.90, 10.18)

7.15 (5.73, 8.90)

−2.253

0.024

septum secundum thickness

4.85 (3.90, 6.20)

4.00 (3.33, 5.25)

−1.741

0.082

PFO Types

  

9.560

0.017

SUT

21 (20.2)

0 (0.0)

  

GUT

44 (42.3)

11 (55.0)

  

Right funnelform

16 (15.4)

7 (35.0)

  

Left funnelform

23 (22.1)

2 (10.0)

  

IAS mobility distance

3.00 (2.00, 5.00)

5.00(3.00, 7.00)

−2.547

0.011

PFO angle

20.17 ± 7.22

20.70 ± 7.03

0.300

0.765

RoEP score

6.07 ± 1.95

5.55 ± 1.85

1.097

0.275