Table 7 Logistic regression analysis of the influence of c-TTE RLS classification
From: PFO morphology for evaluation of c-TCD and c-TTE RLS grades
Factors | B | SE | Waldχ2 | P | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAS mobility distance | 0.872 | 0.198 | 19.429 | 0.000 | 2.392(1.623 ~ 3.526) |
PFO Types | – | – | 5.470 | 0.140 | – |
GUT | – | – | – | – | 1.000 |
SUT | 1.445 | 0.686 | 4.444 | 0.035 | 4.244(1.107 ~ 16.270) |
Right funnelform | 1.576 | 0.866 | 3.314 | 0.069 | 4.835(0.886 ~ 26.381) |
Left funnelform | 0.789 | 0.816 | 0.936 | 0.333 | 2.202(0.445 ~ 10.899) |
Constant | −2.502 | 0.652 | 14.742 | 0.000 | – |