Skip to main content

Table 3 Peri-procedure and follow-up data

From: Effect of esketamine vs dexmedetomidine adjunct to propofol sedation for pediatric 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

 

Esketamine–propofol (n = 56)

Dexmedetomidine–propofol (n = 55)

P value

During the procedures

 RSS at beginning of MRI

6 (6, 6)

6 (6, 6)

 > 0.999

 RSS at 5 min in MRI

6 (5, 6)

6 (5, 6)

0.915

 RSS at end of MRI

5 (5, 6)

5 (5, 6)

0.422

 Inadequate sedation

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 > 0.999

 Excessive salivation

2 (3.6%)

0 (0%)

0.496

 Hypotension

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 > 0.999

 Laryngospasm

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 > 0.999

 Scanning time, min

22 (13.3, 35.8)

21 (14, 35)

0.643

 Radiologist satisfaction scores

8 (8, 9)

9 (8, 9)

0.860

In the RR

 Emergence delirium

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 > 0.999

 PAED scores at emergence

5 (5, 7)

5 (5, 6)

0.223

 PAED scores at 15 min after emergence

3 (2, 3)

3 (2, 4)

0.325

 PAED scores at RR discharge

2 (1, 3)

2 (2, 3)

0.836

 Nausea and vomiting

1 (1.8%)

0 (0%)

 > 0.999

24 h after the procedures

 Poor appetite

2 (3.6%)

0 (0%)

0.496

 Nausea and vomiting

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 > 0.999

 Parent satisfaction scores

9 (8, 9)

9 (7, 9)

0.465

  1. Data are numbers (%) or medians (interquartile range)
  2. RSS Ramsey sedation score, PAED Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium, RR recovery room