Skip to main content

Table 2 GRADE summary of findings table of primary outcomes

From: Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes

Study design

Anticipated absolute effectsc (95% CI)

Relative effect (95% CI)

№. of participants (studies)

Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)

Risk with non-prone

Risk with prone

Non-intubated patients

Mortality

RCT

224 per 1000

204 per 1000 (175–238)

RR 0.91 (0.78–1.06)

2404 (8)

High

NRS

314 per 1000

176 per 1000 (141–220)

RR 0.56 (0.45–0.70)

3361 (18)

Very lowa

Need for intubation

RCT

389 per 1000

315 per 1000 (280–351)

RR 0.81 (0.72–0.90)

2156 (7)

High

NRS

412 per 1000

267 per 1000 (206–350)

RR 0.65 (0.50–0.85)

3374 (18)

Very lowa

Adverse events

RCT

24 per 1000

23 per 1000 (16–34)

RR 0.97 (0.66–1.43)

7011 (6)

Moderateb

NRS

Cases in the prone group were reported as follows: desaturation or hemodynamic worsening 0/30 [34], back pain 2/30 [34] and 3/57 [42], bloating sensation 2/30 [34], gastric distension and vomit 0/81 [30], peripheral line removal 2/57 [42] and 2/81 [30], nasal skin ulceration 2/81 [30], major adverse events 0/48 [44], overall adverse events 0/17 [5] and 0/38 [46]

716 (6)

Very lowa,b

Intubated patients

Mortality

NRS

525 per 1000

504 per 1000 (441–573)

RR 0.96 (0.84–1.09)

995 (2)

Very lowa

Chen et al. [38] reported better survival in prone group than in non-prone group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.282, 95% CI 0.126 to 0.63)

40 (1)

Adverse events

NRS

Cases in the prone group were reported as follows: endotracheal tube dislocation 0/62 [9], peripheral line removal 2/62 [9]

261 (1)

Very lowa,b

  1. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
  2. High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
  3. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
  4. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
  5. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect
  6. CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio; RCT, randomized controlled trial; NRS, nonrandomized studies
  7. aDowngrade for risk-of-bias concern in the domains of possibility of target group comparisons, target group selection, and confounder
  8. bNo more than 300 events
  9. cThe risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI)