Skip to main content

Table 3 Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale for the cohort studies

From: Therapeutic and adverse effects of adrenaline on patients who suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Selection of cohort (4)

Comparability (1)

Outcome (3)

Representativeness of the exposed cohort

Selection of the non-exposed cohort

Ascertainment of exposure

Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study

Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis

Assessment of outcome

Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur

Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts

2015 Fukuda

2016 Fukuda

2012 Machida

2012 Hagihara

2012 Hayashi

2012 Olasveengen

2013 Goto

2013 Neset

2014 Kaji

2014 Dumas

2021 Matsuyama

2013 Hayakawa

2020 Baert

2013 Nakahara

2022 Yu Wang

  1. For each numbered item in the selection and exposure categories, the study may receive a maximum of one star. For comparability category, up to two stars may be given