Predictive impact of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) for left ventricular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study

Table 4 Predictive value of FAR for LVEF in different logistic regression analysis

	FAR as a continuous variable^a
	OR	95% CI	P value
Crude model	1.037	1.029–1.046	< 0.001
Model1	1.019	1.007–1.030	0.001
Model2	1.026	1.011–1.042	0.001
Model3	1.026	1.008–1.045	0.005
Model4	1.030	1.011–1.049	0.002

	FAR as a categorical variable^b
	T1	T2		T3
		OR (95% CI)	P value	OR (95% CI)	P value
Crude model	Reference	2.628 (1.705–4.052)	< 0.001	6.854 (4.434–10.594)	< 0.001
Model1	Reference	2.090 (1.223–3.571)	0.007	2.140 (1.166–3.927)	0.014
Model2	Reference	2.431 (1.175–5.029)	0.017	3.699 (1.649–8.298)	0.002
Model3	Reference	2.530 (1.094–5.854)	0.030	3.738 (1.512–9.242)	0.004
Model4	Reference	2.105 (0.869–5.094)	0.099	3.395 (1.303–8.848)	0.012

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex (female), BMI, HR, SBP, DBP, smoking, hypertension, NT-proBNP, cardiac troponin T
Model 2: adjusted for variables included in Model 1 and white blood cells, NLR, MLR, PLR, hs-CRP, ALT, AST
Model 3: adjusted for variables included in Model 2 and cystatin C, Na⁺, Ca²⁺, homocysteine, PT, PTA, INR, APTT, d-dimer, FDP, triglycerides, apoA, Lp(a)
Model 4: adjusted for variables included in Model 3 and Gensini score, initial diagnosis (STEMI), Killip class (≥ III)
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
^aThe OR was examined by per 1-unit increase of FAR
^bThe OR was examined regarding T1 (the lowest) as reference

ISSN: 2047-783X