Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space on the neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a pilot study

European Journal of Medical Research volume 29, Article number: 96 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of local betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space on postoperative neurosensory deficits.

Materials and methods

A prospective controlled clinical study was conducted on 16 patients (6 male, 10 female; mean age, 24.95 ± 9.22 years) who underwent bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy for mandibular discrepancies. One side of each patient’s mandible was randomly selected as the control side, and the opposite side as the experimental side. On the experimental side, a solution of betamethasone (6 mg/1 ml) was injected into the pterygomandibular space after the completion of wound closure. Neurosensory tests, including light touch, two-point discrimination, direction of movement, thermal sensitivity, and pin-prick discrimination, were performed. The follow-up period ranged between 6 and 12 months, according to the particular sensory test. The Fisher exact test was used to analyse the data.

Results

The light touch sensation was abnormal in 75% of the control side and 31% of the study side, with the difference being significant (p = 0.03). However, at 6 months, all the study cases regained touch sensation, compared to 69% of the control side. No significant difference in direction movement discrimination was seen; however, at 3 months, the study side showed significantly less direction sensation (19%) compared to the control side (56%) (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the two-point discrimination; however, at 3 months, the study side had a significantly less abnormal two-point sensation (13%) than the control side (56%) (p = 0.02). In addition, no significant difference was noted in thermal sensitivity or pin-prick sensation.

Conclusion

Betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space reduces neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies nd leads to faster recovery of sensations.

Introduction

Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) is the most commonly performed mandibular orthognathic surgical procedure to relocate the body of the mandible to correct prognathism, retrognathism, or asymmetry. Neurosensory deficit (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve is one of the most common complications of BSSO [1]. The incidence of NSD immediately after BSSO ranges between 9 and 85% of patients [2]. However, other studies claim that 100% of patients develop this complication [3]. The prevalence of NSD one or two years after BSSO ranges from 0% up to 85% [3]. Numerous factors, including the diversity of nerve function evaluations, difference in follow-up times between studies, and assessor expertise, have been implicated in these variations [4].

Paresthesia, dysesthesia (burning, stinging, or stabbing sensations), sensory impairments, allodynia, or hyperesthesia are some of the reported symptoms associated with damaged nerves [5]. Both paresthesia and hypoesthesia are frequently reported [4]. NSD may have an impact on patients' daily lives and can cause social and psychological problems due to hyperesthesia and its detrimental effects on eating, drinking, speaking, and social interaction [6]. The inferior alveolar nerve may be compressed by bone fragments, damaged directly by mechanical stimulation of the nerve, or indirectly by surgical instruments or by the direction of movement of the distal bone fragments [7].

Many factors can affect NSD after BSSO, including patient age and sex, the extent and direction of movement of the distal segment, mandible cutting devices, the split pattern, the degree of nerve exposure and manipulation, the proximity of the mandibular canal to the buccal cortical plate, the method of fixation, the surgeon’s skill, and the method and timing of neurosensory testing [8].

The reflection of soft tissue and compression of the nerve on the medial side of the mandibular ramus by protective retractors are two additional significant factors linked to postoperative NSD. After subperiosteal dissection on the medial aspect of the mandibular ramus, it is crucial to place a suitable retractor, such as a channel retractor, directly above the lingula to protect the IAN and facilitate the medial horizontal bone cut. The channel retractor, while improving vision in this limited surgical field, is likely to overstretch the IAN during retraction to improve vision [9].

To minimize pain, swelling, trismus, and neurosensory disturbance, supportive medications have been recommended for patients undergoing operations like orthognathic surgery, impacted tooth surgery, and dental implantology. When given not later than one week after surgery, steroids have the ability to hasten the healing of sensory dysfunctions, according to Seo et al. [10].

Few studies have evaluated the effect of local and systemic corticosteroids on NSD after BSSO. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space on the NSD of the inferior alveolar nerve after BSSO.

Materials and methods

Study design and sample

A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted on patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, with or without Le Fort I osteotomies, at CMC Hospital in Erbil, Iraq, from 2015 to 2022. The inclusion criteria were age less than 40 years and the absence of systemic diseases. Patients who underwent concomitant genioplasty, extraction of impacted third molars, and unfavourable splits were excluded. Patients with a previous history of mandibular trauma and those who used drugs were also excluded (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort flowchart diagram of the clinical trial

Full size image

The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 (revised 2018) and received approval from the ethical committee board. All participants willingly agreed to take part in the study and provided by signing a consent form.

Randomization

The BSSO sides were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental side received a betamethasone local injection into the pterygomandibular space, while the control side received a sterile distilled water injection. The allocation of sides to receive either the experimental or sham solution was done using a simple randomization method involving a coin toss.

Surgical procedures

All BSSO surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (S.A.H), following the Obwegeser/Dal˗Pont procedure with Hunsuck modification. After wound closure, the experimental side received a 1 ml (6 mg) injection of betamethasone (CKOÇAK FARMA, Turkey) into the pterygomandibular space. Each millilitre contained 3.0 mg of betamethasone acetate and 3.0 mg of betamethasone sodium phosphate. The control side received an equivalent volume of sterile distilled water injected into the pterygomandibular space. To maintain the blinding of the study, the solution was administered by a surgeon who was not directly involved in the surgery or postoperative visits.

After the surgical procedure, patients were provided with analgesics (ibuprofen or paracetamol) for as long as they found them beneficial. Additional pain medication during the immediate postoperative recovery, when needed, included codeine phosphate or tramadol. Patients also received antibiotics until postoperative days 7–10, typically penicillin or a first-generation cephalosporin. In the case of a penicillin allergy, clindamycin was prescribed.

Study variables

To assess the sensory capacity of the inferior alveolar nerve, five neurosensory tests were conducted: touch (static light touch and direction of movement discrimination), temperature sensitivity, two-point discrimination, and the pin-prick test [11]. The tests were performed at the vermilion border of the lower lip (1 cm medial to the angle of the mouth) before surgery and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after surgery. All subjects underwent testing in a semi-reclined position with their eyes closed in a room at room temperature, free from any audio or visual disturbances. The same investigator performed the neurosensory tests on all patients in the same order. Each instrument's use was evaluated on a skin area with normal sensitivity before each neurosensory test. For every two or three stimuli that the patient was unable to identify, additional stimuli were applied to a skin location with normal sensitivity, establishing a baseline for a typical cutaneous feeling.

  1. 1.

    Static light touch: This test involved applying a piece of cotton, and the patient was instructed to raise their hand when they felt the sensation of touch.

  2. 2.

    Direction of movement discrimination: A piece of cotton was swiped 10 times for a distance of 1 cm in a right-to-left or left-to-right direction. When the correct response was 9 out of 10 (90%) or higher, the result was considered normal.

  3. 3.

    Static two-point discrimination: This test utilized a sharp millimetre calliper. It began with the points essentially touching, allowing the patient to discriminate only one point. Then, the calliper points were progressively opened in 1 mm increments until the patient could discriminate between two separate points of contact. There must be no skin blanching, as it indicates too much pressure being applied. The separation ranged from 1 to 20 mm. The test was considered abnormal when the patient perceived two points 3 mm farther apart.

  4. 4.

    Thermal sensitivity test: This test was conducted using two small glass tubes containing cold (15 to 20 ℃) or hot (40 to 45 ℃) water. The test area was randomly touched 10 times with the test tube and the patient had to decide whether the stimulus was hot or cold. The results of the test were deemed normal when equal to or above 90% of the answers were correct.

  5. 5.

    Pin-prick nociception test: This test was conducted by applying needles with a weight ranging between 0.5 and 15 g. If the weight of the needle was 1 g greater than that of the lightest needle at which the patients felt sharpness during the preoperative period, the test was considered abnormal.

Statistical analysis

The data were analysed using SPSS version 28 computer software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare differences in neurosensory test results between the two groups at five time points after surgery. The level of significance was considered at a p-value ≤ 0.05.

Results

The study included 16 patients (6 male and 10 female), with a mean (SD) age of 24.95 (9.22) years, ranging from 17 to 40 years). All patients completed the follow-up neurosensory testing visits.

Light touch sensation was lost in 13 (81%) cases on the study side and 15 (93%) cases on the control side, with no significant difference noted (p = 0.599). However, at 6 months, all patients on the study side regained sensation, while five (31%) cases on the control side still had abnormal sensation, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.043). By 9 months, no patients on the study side experienced abnormal sensation (Table 1).

Table 1 Light touch test of the study and controlled sides
Full size table

Direction of movement discrimination was lost in 15 (93%) cases on the study side and in all cases on the control side. By 6 months postoperatively, all the study sides regained sensation, while the control sides full recovered by 9 months (Table 2).

Table 2 Direction of movement discrimination test of the study and control sides
Full size table

Static two-point discrimination was abnormal in 12 (75%) cases on the study side and 14 (87.5%) cases on the control side, with no significant difference noted (p = 0.653). At 9 months, all study sides regained sensation, while three (18%) cases on the control side still had abnormal sensations. These sensations remained unchanged at 9 months, but fully recovered at 12 months (Table 3).

Table 3 Two-point discrimination test of the study and control sides
Full size table

The thermal sensitivity test was abnormal in all control sides and in 13 (81%) cases on the study sides, with no significant difference (p = 1.00). By 3 months, all cases on the study side regained sensation, whereas only 12 (75%) cases on the control side did so. The remaining four (25%) cases regained the thermal sensation at 6 months post-surgery (Table 4).

Table 4 Thermal sensitivity test of the study and control sides
Full size table

The pin-prick test was abnormal in 12 (75%) cases on both sides; however, both sides showed complete recovery of sensation at 6 months (Table 5).

Table 5 Pin-prick test of the study and control sides
Full size table

Discussion

This prospective controlled study aimed to investigate whether the NSD of the inferior alveolar nerve after sagittal split ramus osteotomy would be affected by the local injection of betamethasone into the pterygomandibular space. In this study, it was hypothesized that local betamethasone injection would lessen the NSD after BSSO. The results of the study supported this hypothesis, indicating that the betamethasone-injected sides exhibited less NSD than the control sides.

NSD of the inferior alveolar nerve, a concern throughout all stages of surgery, is the main issue in mandibular osteotomies, especially BSSO [12]. The inferior alveolar nerve follows the course of the osteotomy during BSSO, increasing the likelihood of nerve damage. The deficit may manifest as numbness or unusual sensations in the gingiva, teeth, chin, and lower lip. The majority of neurosensory defects identified during the postoperative phase are reversible [13]. However, neurosensory disturbances persisting even a year after a mandibular osteotomy should be considered more severe and permanent [14]. Consequently, only patients with at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up were analysed in this study.

Numerous factors, such as advanced age, female gender, nerve exposure and manipulation, direction of mandibular movement, and screw fixation, have been associated with inferior alveolar nerve NSD. Notably, older age is significantly correlated with postoperative NSD, attributed to axonal atrophy and a reduced ability to heal damaged nerves in older people [15]. Additionally, compared to male patients, female patients experience more postoperative NSD [16].

In this split-mouth, randomized clinical trial, each participant was compared with themselves, eliminating the need to evaluate age or sex as variables in this study. Moreover, NSD and greater mandibular advancement have been found to be significantly correlated [17]. In contrast to bicortical screw fixation, it has been reported that monocortical screw fixation results in a significantly lower incidence of neurosensory deficits, and these deficits recover completely by the end of the 12th month [18].

In a study aimed at predicting neurosensory alterations after SSRO, Kuroyanagi and Shimozato [9] reported that the development of NSD is associated with surgical exposure on the medial side of the mandibular ramus and subsequent manipulation of the IAN in that region. In the current study, the injection of betamethasone into the pterygomandibular space resulted in less NSD, likely through the reduction of inflammation and oedema around the nerve.

Pourdanesh et al. [19] demonstrated that the application of dexamethasone to the inferior alveolar nerve during BSSO had no preventive effects on NSD, attributing it to the washing effect of irrigation during surgery. The antiinflammatory effect of local betamethasone after spinal root decompression in cats was seen by Wong and Tan [20], noting the relative absence of cytokine differentiation antigens 4- and 5-labelled lymphocytes at the compression site in the steroid-treated group. Sencar et al. [21] investigated the antiinflammatory effect of betamethasone on crushed sciatic nerves in rats and found that combing the nerve growth factor with betamethasone resulted in rapid functional recovery. Al-Bishri et al. [22] identified a beneficial effect of betamethasone on the recovery of damaged sciatic nerves in rats, as reflected in the recruitment of macrophages and the expression of the p75 nerve growth factor receptor.

The limitation of this study is the small sample size and the effect of other factors on the incidence of nerve injury, such as the lingual split pattern, the presence of impacted lower third molars, and the exposure and manipulation of the inferior alveolar nerve during surgery. Hamad [23] found that betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space significantly reduced the inflammatory sequelae of impacted lower third molar surgery.

Conclusion

The local injection of betamethasone into the pterygomandibular space significantly reduces neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and promotes a faster recovery of nerve functions.

Availability of data and materials

The data are available on request by emailing the corresponding author Shehab Ahmed Hamad, at shehab.ahmed@khcms.edu.krd.

References

  1. Lee JG, Kim SG, Lim KJ, Choi KC. Thermographic assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury in patients with dentofacial deformity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(1):74–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nesari S, Kahnberg KE, Rasmusson L. Neurosensory function of the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy: a retrospective study of 68 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(5):495–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips C, Kim SH, Essick G, Tucker M, Turvey TA. Sensory retraining after orthognathic surgery: effect on patient report of altered sensations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(6):788–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agbaje JO, Salem AS, Lambrichts I, Jacobs R, Politis C. Systematic review of the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and the assessment of neurosensory disturbances. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(4):447–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L. Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36(6):425–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips C, Essick G, Blakey G 3rd, Tucker M. Relationship between patients’ perceptions of postsurgical sequelae and altered sensations after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(4):597–607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Kaneuji T, Nogami S, Yamamoto N, Miyamoto I, Yamashita Y. Risk factors for neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy based on position of mandibular canal and morphology of mandibular angle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(2):401–06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shibata M, Takahara N, Tomomatsu N, Kurasawa Y, Sasaki Y, Yoda T. Risk factors of neurosensory disturbances at 1 year postoperatively after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022;134(6):695–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuroyanagi N, Miyachi H, Ochiai S, Kamiya N, Kanazawa T, Nagao T, Shimozato K. Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(7):814–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seo K, Tanaka Y, Terumitsu M, Someya G. Efficacy of steroid treatment for sensory impairment after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(10):1193–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antony PG, Sebastian A, Varghese KG, Sobhana CR, Mohan S, Soumithran CS, Domnic S, Jayakumar N. Neurosensory evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of mandible. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2017;7(2):81–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Iscan D, Ozbilen EO, Ugurlu K, Acar A. The Assessment of neurosensory disturbance following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with subjective and three-dimensional evaluation. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(4):1136–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen S, Forssell K, Virtanen A, Forssell H. An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(1):15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Antonarakis GS, Christou P. Quantitative evaluation of neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy using Semmes Weinstein monofilaments: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(12):2752–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Verweij JP, Mensink G, Fiocco M, van Merkesteyn JP. Incidence and recovery of neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in different age groups: a retrospective study of 263 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(7):898–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MacIntosh RB. Experience with the sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a 13 year review. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981;9(3):151–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thygesen TH, Bardow A, Helleberg M, Norholt SE, Jensen J, Svensson P. Risk factors affecting somatosensory function after sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(3):469–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamashita Y, Otsuka T, Shigematsu M, Goto M. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(4):360–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pourdanesh F, Khayampour A, Jamilian A. Therapeutic effects of local application of dexamethasone during bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(7):1391–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong HK, Tan KJ. Effects of corticosteroids on nerve root recovery after spinal nerve root compression. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;403:248–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sencar L, Güven M, Şaker D, Sapmaz T, Tuli A, Polat S. Ultrastructural effects of nerve growth factor and betamethasone on nerve regeneration after experimental nerve injury. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2020;44(4–6):436–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Bishri A, Forsgren S, Al-Thobaiti Y, Sunzel B, Rosenquist J. Effect of betamethasone on the degree of macrophage recruitment and nerve growth factor receptor p75 immunoreaction during recovery of the sciatic nerve after injury: an experimental study in rats. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46(6):455–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamad SA. Does Betamethasone Injection Into the Pterygomandibular Space Affect the Postoperative Outcomes of Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;81(12):1549–56.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Personal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties, Erbil, Iraq

    Shehab Ahmed Hamad

  2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq

    Khurshid A. Kheder Khrwatany & Saeed Hameed Tutmayi

  3. Department of Dental Assistant, Medical Institute, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Iraq

    Mustafa Rasul Mohammed

Authors
  1. Shehab Ahmed Hamad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Khurshid A. Kheder Khrwatany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mustafa Rasul Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saeed Hameed Tutmayi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.A.H.:Conceptualization, Data collection, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Kh. A. K:Conceptualization, Data collection, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft. M.R.M.:Data collection, Formal analysis, Investigation. S.H.T.:Data collection, and Writing-original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shehab Ahmed Hamad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research was approved by the ethical committee of the Kurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties. Every patient signed an informed consent.

Consent for publication

The authors agree for publication of the article.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamad, S.A., Khrwatany, K.A.K., Mohammed, M.R. et al. Effect of betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space on the neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a pilot study. Eur J Med Res 29, 96 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01615-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01615-4

Keywords

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us