Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Clinical efficacy of radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery on localized renal cell carcinoma

Study

Year of publication

Pathological stage

Tumor size (cm)

Duration of follow-up (months)

RN group

NSS group

Sample size

Age (mean ± SD)

Male (%)

Sample size

Age (mean ± SD)

Male (%)

Lau et al. [15]

2000

T1

3.3a*, 3.7b*

120

164

NA

NA

164

NA

NA

Shinohara et al. [19]

2000

T1, T2, T3

<4.0

12 to 131

51

59

37 (73)

15

61

13 (87)

Poulakis et al. [17]

2003

NP

6.9a*, 3.9b*

14 to 27

199

65.2 ± 11.0

121 (61)

158

62.6 ± 9.9

110 (70)

Patard et al. [16]

2004

T1

4.0#

10 to 208

1075

60.0 ± 12.4

692 (64)

379

59.7 ± 12.3

253 (67)

Becker et al. [6]

2006

T1, T2, T3

3.7*

66*

369

60.2

225 (61)

241

59.4

150 (62)

Mitchell et al. [18]

2006

T1, T2, T3

5.2*

44#

66

66.9

44 (67)

33

68.9

26 (79)

Van Poppel et al. [21]

2007

T0,T1,T2,T3

<4.0

60

273

NA

178 (65)

268

NA

178 (66)

Antonelli et al. [20]

2012

T1,T3

>4.0

25 to 85

2345

62.5

1505 (64)

1,266

60.1

881 (70)

Huang et al. [23]

2009

NP

<4.0

48#

2435

NA

1362 (56)

556

NA

351 (63)

Gratzke et al. [22]

2009

T1, T2, T3

NA

11 to 71

73

NA

46 (63)

44

60.7 ± 12.4

29 (66)

  1. SD, Standard deviation; RN, Radical nephrectomy; NSS, Nephron-sparing surgery; *, Mean; #, Median; a, RN group; b, NSS group; NA, Not clear.