Skip to main content

Table 2 Recipient features peri- and intraoperatively and immunosuppression

From: Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation

Parameters

Group 1 (open drainage)

Group 2 (closed drainage)

p value

Number of patients

56

200

 

Liver transplantation technique

 

 Piggyback technique

2 (4 %)

6 (3 %)

0.5 (ns)

 Retrohepatic caval resection

54 (96 %)

194 (97 %)

0.5 (ns)

Bile duct anastomosis

 End-to-end

24 (43 %)

97 (49 %)

0.6 (ns)

 Side-to-side

32 (57 %)

103 (51 %)

0.5 (ns)

T tube insertion (yes:no)

8:48

16:184

0.1 (ns)

Drain removal (postoperative day)

6 (4–13)

5 (5–11)

0.7 (ns)

Immunosuppression

  

 Tacrolimus and MMF

38 (68 %)

140 (70 %)

0.8 (ns)

 Cyclosporin and MMF

11 (20 %)

52 (26 %)

0.8 (ns)

 Simulect

53 (95 %)

185 (92 %)

0.9 (ns)

Cold ischemia time (min)

512 (212–954)

528 (229–1098)

0.7 (ns)

Operative time (min)

362 (238–712)

358 (360–643)

0.9 (ns)

Intraoperative blood transfusion (units)

4 (0–31)

3.5 (0–23)

0.3 (ns)

Intraoperative platelet transfusion (units)

2 (0–6)

2.5 (0–7)

0.4 (ns)

Intraoperative plasma transfusion (units)

6 (2–29)

7 (1–31)

0.6 (ns)

  1. Values are expressed as median (range)
  2. Group 1 open-circuit drainage (Easy Flow Drain), Group 2 closed-circuit drainage (Robinson Drainage System)