Skip to main content

Table 3 The proportions of respondents who perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency above (i.e. high) and below (i.e. low) the reference interval for “adequate”, “desirable”, “too short” and “too long” IELT

From: Perceptions of normal and abnormal ejaculatory latency times: an observational study in Ghanaian males and females

Parameters

Total

Male

Female

P value

Single

Married

P value

Adequate (3–7)

 Low

4/556 (0.7 %)

4/472 (0.8 %)

0/84 (0.0 %)

1.0000

0/324 (0.0 %)

4/236 (1.7 %)

0.0311

 High

412/556 (74.1 %)

352/472 (74.6 %)

60/84 (71.4 %)

0.5889

220/324 (67.9 %)

192/236 (81.4 %)

0.0005

Desirable (7–13)

 Low

92/568 (16.2 %)

40/488 (16.4 %)

12/84 (14.3 %)

0.0970

48/324 (14.8 %)

40/236 (16.9 %)

0.5568

 High

316/568 (55.6 %)

272/488 (55.7 %)

44/84 (52.4 %)

0.6349

160/324 (49.4 %)

156/236 (66.1 %)

<0.0001

Too short (1–2)

 Low

0/556 (0.0 %)

0/476 (0.0 %)

0/84 (0.0 %)

1.0000

0/324 (0.0 %)

0/236 (0.0 %)

1.0000

 High

352/556 (63.3 %)

302/476 (63.4 %)

50/84 (59.5 %)

0.5406

184/324 (56.8 %)

168/236 (71.2 %)

0.0005

Too long (10–30)

 Low

32/564 (5.7 %)

28/480 (5.8 %)

4/84 (4.8 %)

1.0000

20/324 (6.2 %)

12/240 (5.0 %)

0.5863

 High

232/564 (41.1 %)

192/480 (40.0 %)

40/84 (47.6 %)

0.2293

124/324 (38.3 %)

108/240 (45.0 %)

0.0826