Skip to main content

Table 2 Intubation characteristics: Cormack and Lehane score, POGO score, and personal review of the participants; POGO, percentage of glottis opening; German school grading system with ratings from 1 (very good) to 6 (very poor)

From: Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins

 

Cormack and Lehane score

POGO score

Personal review (German school grading system)

Mean

SEM

p-value*

Mean

SEM

p-value*

mean

SEM

p-value*

Manikin A

 Direct laryngoscopy

1.2

.1

 

77.1

3.7

 

2.2

.1

 

 Storz cMac

1.1

.1

.493

79.8

4.4

.615

2.2

.2

.803

 Storz dBlade

1.0

.0

.104

91.2

2.3

.000

1.9

.3

.090

 Ambu King Vision

1.0

.0

.104

93.6

2.2

.000

1.9

.2

.137

Manikin B

 Direct laryngoscopy

1.9

.2

 

40.2

6.3

 

2.7

.2

 

 Storz cMac

1.4

.1

.015

59.8

6.9

.012

2.1

.2

.045

 Storz dBlade

1.0

.0

.000

89.1

2.4

.000

1.6

.1

.001

 Ambu King Vision

1.0

.0

.000

94.3

2.2

.000

1.5

.2

.000

Manikin C

 Direct laryngoscopy

2.7

.2

 

12.8

4.2

 

4.0

.3

 

 Storz cMac

1.7

.1

.000

48.2

7.2

.000

2.9

.2

.000

 Storz dBlade

1.1

.0

.000

84.8

2.8

.000

1.6

.2

.000

 Ambu King Vision

1.1

.1

.000

83.4

4.4

.000

2.4

.3

.000

  1. * Level of significance compared to the DL at the same manikin