Approach | Details | Advantages | Disadvantages | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cartilage graft | Usage of different cartilage sources (septal, auricular, costal), handcrafted | Autologous material | Possible long-term deformation, partial resorption | |
Turkish delight | Use of autologous cartilage and fascia | Partially autologous material, easily to produce and to form | Partial resorption and deformation, allograft (fascia) | |
Bone graft | Mostly taken from rib (also as costal cartilage with adjacent rib) or calvarial bone | Stability, less warping, resembling bone–cartilage parts of the nose | Donor site morbidity, partially unnatural biomechanics | |
Gore-Tex | Synthetic, sponge like materials | Easy to use, soft, shapeable, tissue ingrowth possible | Extrusion, foreign body reaction | |
Polyethylene | Biomaterial with porous structure, e.g., Medpor | Low inflammatory reaction, ingrowth of surrounding tissue | Extrusion, infection, stiffness | [43] |
Silicone implant | Preformed implant | Easy to use, cheap | Extrusion, dislocation, unnatural feeling, capsular formation, deformation of the nose | [44] |
Fillers | Hyaluronic acid derivatives, calcium hydroxylapatite gel | Easy to use, resorbable (hyaluronic), long-term stable (hydroxylapatite), easy dosing | Infection, necrosis, thinning of skin | |
Fat transplantation | Autologous alternative to the use of dermal fillers, exploiting lipofilling technologies | Autologous material, easy to dose, soft, repeatable procedure | Large volumes need multiple procedures, larger volumes lacking stability and persistence of shape | [47] |