Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis for urinary continence at 2 weeks after RP

From: The significance of transrectal ultrasound and urologist_dually guided pelvic floor muscle exercise in improving urinary continence after radical prostatectomy

Factors

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

Age (year)

 

0.970 (0.914–1.030)

0.327

0.956 (0.894–1.021)

0.179

BMI (kg/m2)

 

0.986 (0.835–1.139)

0.844

0.984 (0.841–1.151)

0.840

PSA (ng/ml)

 

0.967 (0.915–1.022)

0.237

0.965 (0.906–1.027)

0.265

Cholestenone (mmol/L)

 

1.357 (0.907–2.031)

0.138

1.437 (0.934–2.211)

0.099

Time of RP (min)

 

0.999 (0.995–1.003)

0.659

  

Intraoperative bleeding (ml)

 

1.000 (0.997–1.003)

0.906

  

Hospital stay

 

0.950 (0.894–1.010)

0.101

  

Gleason scores

≦7 vs ≧8

0.736 (0.346–1.564)

0.425

0.732 (0.324–1.652)

0.453

Neoadjuvant therapy

No vs yes

1.144 (0.469–2.789)

0.767

  

TURP

No vs yes

0.377 (0.138–1.029)

0.057

0.293 (0.099–0.876)

0.027

Hypertension

No vs yes

0.858 (0.394–1.870)

0.700

  

Diabetes

No vs yes

0.569 (0.225–1.441)

0.234

  

Operation

LRP vs RARP

1.008 (0.471–2.156)

0.984

  

Lymph node dissection

No vs yes

1.036 (0.461–2.328)

0.931

  

Guidance

No vs yes

2.566 (1.186–5.550)

0.017

2.538 (1.124–5.732)

0.025