Skip to main content

Table 6 Differentiating features between drug-induced phototoxic, photoallergic and photodistributed Steven’s–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

From: Photodistributed Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and proposal for a new diagnostic classification

UVR reaction type

Phototoxic

Photoallergic

Photodistributed SJS/TEN

Incidence

High

Low

Low

Pathophysiology

Direct tissue injury

Type IV hypersensitive reaction

Type IV hypersensitive reactiona

Sensitization Required

No

Yes

Yes

Required dose of medication

High

Low

Low

Cross-reactions to related agents

Low

High

Mediumb

Agent type

Oral > topical

Oral < topical

Oral > topical

Onset after light exposure

 < 24 h (less common > 24 h)

 > 24 h

 > 24 h

Progression / worsening of rash

24–48 h

48–72 h

 > 48 h (up to week(s))

Clinical skin appearance

Exaggerated sunburn

Eczematous / Dermatitis

Photodistributed erythematous macules and flat atypical target lesions with vesicles/bullae and confluence of lesions

Distribution

Only UVR exposed areas

UVR exposed areas; may spread outside UVR areas

UVR exposed areas; may spread outside UVR areas

Palmar and plantar erythema

Uncommonc

Uncommonc

Common

Mucous membrane involvement

Uncommonc

Uncommonc

Always

Nikolsky sign

Negativec

Negativec

Positive

Histology

Necrotic keratinocytes, predominantly lymphocytic and neutrophilic dermal infiltrate

Epidermal spongiosis, exocytosis of lymphocytes and perivascular inflammatory infiltrate

Subepidermal blisters with widespread necrosis (full thickness) and apoptotic keratinocytes associated with minimal lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate

Direct Immunofluorescence

Negative

May be positived

Negative

  1. UVR  Ultraviolet radiation, SJS   Steven’s–Johnson syndrome, TEN  Toxic epidermal necrolysis
  2. aPhoto component unknown, but ultimately assumed to result in a drug-induced type IV hypersensitive reaction that is seen in SJS/TEN
  3. bNo specific study reports the incidence of drug-induced SJS/TEN cross-reactivity, although cases have been reported [105,106,107]
  4. cNot mentioned in the literature as findings of phototoxic/photoallergic reactions
  5. dFindings rarely reported [109]