Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics distribution of the individuals in each subgroup according to the two criteria

From: Comparison of the lower limit of normal to the fixed ratio method for the diagnosis of airflow obstruction at high altitudes: a large cross-sectional survey of subjects living between 3000–4700 m above sea level

 

FR+/LLN− group (n = 7, 0.2%)

FR−/LLN+ group (n = 143, 3.9%)

FR−/LLN− group (n = 3273, 88.4%)

FR+/LLN+ group (n = 279, 7.5%)

P valuea

FR−/LLN+ group vs. FR−/LLN− group

FR−/LLN+ group vs. FR+/LLN+ group

Age—years

73.0 (4.5)

30.1 (11.0)

38.6 (13.6)

47.0 (13.5)

< 0.001

< 0.001

BMI—kg/m2

25.5 (3.0)

23.0 (3.7)

24.1 (4.1)

23.9 (3.6)

0.895

0.041

Male—N

6 (85.7)

47 (32.9)

1641 (50.1)

134 (48.0)

< 0.001

0.001

History of tuberculosis

1 (14.3)

10 (7.0)

155 (4.7)

27 (9.7)

0.064

0.618

Household air pollutionb

3 (42.9)

108 (75.5)

1924 (58.8)

214 (76.7)

0.002

0.974

Exposure in the workplaceb

1 (14.3)

3 (2.1)

105 (3.2)

13 (4.7)

0.567

0.602

Smoking history

4 (57.1)

24 (16.8)

820 (25.1)

80 (28.7)

0.480

0.175

Symptomsb

5 (71.4)

55 (38.5)

1251 (38.2)

160 (57.3)

0.356

0.282

CAT scoreb ≥ 10

5 (71.4)

119 (83.2)

2538 (77.5)

246 (88.2)

0.011

0.488

  1. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or number %
  2. BMI, body mass index; CAT, COPD assessment test; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  3. aAnalyses of differences using logistic regression. All models were adjusted for age, BMI, sex, risk factors for COPD, smoking status, CAT score, and respiratory symptoms
  4. bData missing for household air pollution (n = 15), exposure to dust or chemicals in the workplace (n = 36), respiratory symptoms (n = 80), and CAT scores (n = 80)