Skip to main content

Table 1 Absolute number and incidence of high-energy blunt pelvic ring injuries in the defined population (2014–2020)

From: High-energy blunt pelvic ring injury incidence and polytrauma caseload in a single level I trauma center during COVID-19 related pseudo-lockdown measures: a retrospective cohort study based on a prospective registry

Period

Population ≥ 16 y.o.a

PRI type A, B and Cb

PRI type B and Cb

Full year

Mar 16-Jun 19

Full year

Mar 16-Jun 19

N

Incidence

N

Incidence

N

Incidence

N

Incidence

2014

403′045

18

4.5

5

1.2

14

3.5

4

1.0

2015

409′722

21

5.1

6

1.5

16

3.9

4

1.0

2016

412′429

20

4.8

7

1.7

17

4.1

7

1.7

2017

416′254

32

7.7

9

2.2

26

6.2

8

1.9

2018

419′288

18

4.3

6

1.4

14

3.3

5

1.2

2019

423′172

19

4.5

10

2.4

17

4.0

10

2.4

2020

424′901

16

3.8

6

1.4

14

3.3

6

1.4

  1. Values are expressed as absolute numbers except for incidence which is expressed per 100,000 persons per year
  2. Full year corresponds to the full calendar year (January 1st to December 31st)
  3. The period Mar 16–Jun 19 corresponds to the pseudo-lockdown period evaluated in this study: March 16th to June 19th
  4. PRI: pelvic ring injury; Mar: March; Jun: June
  5. The 2020 pseudo-lockdown period and year are highlighted in bold for clarity purpose
  6. aDescription of the population exclusively served by the authors' level I trauma center was obtained from the government’s Statistics Office
  7. bPRI type A, B and C encompasses all types of pelvic ring injuries as described by the OTA/AO classification; PRI type B and C only encompasses type B and C pelvic ring injuries as described by the OTA/AO classification