Skip to main content

Table 2 MR estimates from different methods of assessing the causal effect of appendicular lean mass on osteoarthritis

From: Causal relationship between sarcopenia and osteoarthritis: a bi-directional two-sample mendelian randomized study

Exposures

Outcomes

No. of IVs

Heterogeneity test

MR-egger

MR results

OR (95% CI)

p

Cochran’s q (p)

Intercept (p)

Method

ALM

KOA

486

993.209 (< 0.001)

0.003 (0.079)

IVW

1.104 (1.041,1.171)

0.001

     

MR-egger

0.967 (0.825,1.134)

0.679

     

WM

1.0.85 (1.009,1.166)

0.037

     

PRESSO (9)

1.134 (1.073, 1.199)

 < 0.001

ALM

HOA

487

890.952 (< 0.001)

0.004 (0.052)

IVW

1.151 (1.071,1.237)

 < 0.001

     

MR-egger

0.961 (0.791,1.168)

0.690

     

WM

1.154 (1.056,1.261)

0.002

     

PRESSO (7)

1.155 (1.081,1.235)

 < 0.001

ALM

TKR

487

917.707 (< 0.001)

0.005 (0.034)

IVW

1.114 (1.007,1.232)

0.036

     

MR-egger

0.845 (0.643,1.112)

0.321

     

WM

1.114 (1.007,1.232)

0.098

     

PRESSO (11)

1.190 (1.084,1.307)

 < 0.001

ALM

THR

486

894.639 (< 0.001)

0.006 (0.014)

IVW

1.203 (1.099,1.316)

 < 0.001

     

MR-egger

0.906 (0.711,1.156)

0.429

     

WM

1.143 (1.020,1.281)

0.021

     

PRESSO (8)

1.226 (1.129,1.332)

 < 0.001

  1. MR Mendelian randomization, IVs instrumental variables, GS grip strength, KOA knee osteoarthritis, HOA hip osteoarthritis, TKR total knee replacement, THR total hip replacement, ALM appendicular lean mass, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, IVW inverse variance weighted, WM weighted median, PRESSO Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier