Skip to main content

Table 4 MR estimates from different methods of assessing the causal effect of total knee and hip replacement on sarcopenia

From: Causal relationship between sarcopenia and osteoarthritis: a bi-directional two-sample mendelian randomized study

Exposures

Outcomes

No. of IVs

Heterogeneity test

MR-egger

MR results

Beta/OR (95% CI)

p

Cochran’s q (p)

Intercept (p)

Method

TKR

GS

5

56.813(< 0.001)

0.047(0.758)

IVW

0.999(0.739,1.351)

0.997

     

MR-egger

1.017(0.851,1.215)

0.864

     

WM

1.138(0.968, 1.340)

0.019

     

PRESSO (0)

0.999(0.739,1.351)

0.997

TKR

ALM

5

27.341(< 0.001)

0.005(0.836)

IVW

0.018

0.501

     

MR-egger

0.043

0.886

     

WM

0.005

0.733

     

PRESSO (0)

0.018

0.501

THR

GS

22

59.120(< 0.001)

− 0.004(0.749)

IVW

1.037(0.978,1.101)

0.222

     

MR-egger

1.074(0.864,1.336)

0.528

     

WM

1.012(0.961,1.083)

0.519

     

PRESSO (0)

1.037(0.978,1.101)

0.222

THR

ALM

17

83.332 (< 0.001)

0.007(0.157)

IVW

− 0.023

0.081

     

MR-egger

− 0.087

0.072

     

WM

− 0.023

0.235

     

PRESSO (4)

− 0.012

0.158

  1. MR Mendelian randomization, IVs instrumental variables, GS grip strength, KOA knee osteoarthritis, HOA hip osteoarthritis, TKR total knee replacement, THR total hip replacement, ALM appendicular lean mass, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, IVW inverse variance weighted, WM weighted median, PRESSO Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier