Skip to main content

Table 1 Generalities and patient baseline of the included studies (RCT: randomised clinical trial)

From: CT-based navigation for total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Author, year

Journal

Design

Procedures (n)

Female

Mean age

Intervention

Approach

Navigation system

Confalonieri et al. 2008 [27]

Orthopedics

Retrospective

22

59%

60.4

Image Navigated

Posterolateral

Orthopilot

22

59%

60.8

Conventional

Posterolateral

 

Domb et al. 2015 [18]

Arthroplasty

Retrospective

43

 

64.7

Image Navigated

Anterior

Vectorvision 3.0

708

 

64.7

Conventional

Posterior

 

Haaker et al. 2007 [16]

Arthroplasty

Retrospective

98

64%

66.9

Image Navigated

Anterolateral

Optotrak Surigate

69

62%

63.4

Conventional

Anterolateral

 

Kalteis et al. 2006 [24]

Bone Joint J

RCT

30

40%

63.9

Image Navigated

Transgluteal

Vectorvision BrainLab 3.0

30

57%

64.7

Conventional

Transgluteal

 

Leenders et al. 2002 [28]

Wilet Interscience

RCT

50

58%

61

Image Navigated

Anterolateral

Surgi-Gate system

50

58%

64.9

Conventional

Anterolateral

 

Lin et al. 2011 [29]

Arthroplasty

Prospective

22

  

Image Navigated

Posterior

Stryker CT-Hip System

25

40%

63.5

Conventional

Posterior

 

Murphy et al. 2006 [17]

J Orthop Rel Res

Prospective

185

47%

56.1

Image Navigated

Transgluteal

 

189

50%

50.4

Conventional

Transgluteal

 

Sugano et al. 2012 [30]

Clin Orthop Rel Res

Retrospective

60

88%

53

Image Navigated

Posterolateral

Optotrak UltraSPARC

120

83%

53

Conventional

Posterolateral

 

Verdier et al. 2016 [31]

Orthop Traumatol

RCT

39

54%

67

Image Navigated

Anterolateral

Orthopilot

39

54%

68

Conventional

Anterolateral