Skip to main content

Table 1 The baseline characteristics of included studies

From: Systemic inflammation response index as a clinical outcome evaluating tool and prognostic indicator for hospitalized stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Nation

Study design

Participants (n)

Male (%)

Age (y)

Type of stroke

Type of intervention

Cutoff (× 109/L)

Primary endpoints

Secondary endpoints

Follow-up

NOS

Fei et al.

2020

China

Retrospective cohort study

146

63.01

60.21 ± 13.84

ICH in basal ganglia

–

5.4

END (assessed by NIHSS and GCS)

Predictive value of SIRI

3

5

Zhang et al.

2020

China

Retrospective cohort study

178

34.83

57.64 ± 10.23

aSAH

Coiling or Clipping

4.105

Functional outcome (assessed by GOS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

7

Zhang et al.

2020

China

Retrospective cohort study

125

36

56.00 ± 12.00

aSAH

Coiling or Clipping

3.63

Vasospasm

Predictive value of SIRI

–

5

Lattanzi et al.

2021

Italy

Retrospective cohort study

184

47.28

75 (61–81)

AIS

EVT

3.8

Futile Recanalization (assessed by mRS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

8

Li et al.

2021

China

Retrospective study based on a prospectively collected database

403 in original cohort

262 in PSM cohort

68.48 in original cohort

67.55 in PSM cohort

58.56 ± 13.28 in original cohort

58.77 ± 13.56 in PSM cohort

ICH

Surgical intervention or conservative treatment

2.76

Functional outcomes (assessed by mRS) mortality

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d for functional outcomes

30 d for mortality

8

Shi et al.

2021

China

Retrospective cohort study

135

40.74

57.03 ± 2.15

aSAH

–

5.91

Poor outcome (assessed by GOS)

HHS, mFS, DCI, Pneumonia, AHC; Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

8

Yi et al.

2021

Korea

Retrospective study based on a prospectively collected database

440

59.09

70.34 ± 12.87

AIS

MT

2.9

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

8

Yun et al.

2021

Korea

Retrospective multi-center

680

68.24

56.43 ± 12.96

aSAH

Surgery or Intervention

3.2

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

HHS, mFS, DCI, Vasospasm, AHC

90 d

8

Zhang et al.

2021

China

Retrospective cohort

2450 (MIMIC-III database)

52.29

68.17 ± 15.68

Stroke

–

3.8

Mortality

Predictive value of SIRI

In-hospital, 30 d, 90 d, 1 year

7

Li et al.

2022

China

Retrospective single-center

303

58.75

69 (60–78)

AIS

IVT

–

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

8

Ma et al.

2022

China

Prospective single-center

63

68.84

65.35 ± 11.33

AIS

IVT with alteplase

1.01

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Severity of AIS (NIHSS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

9

Wang et al.

2022

China

Retrospective single-center cohort study

375

65.87

61.9 ± 11.3

AIS

–

0.767

END (assessed by NIHSS)

–

every day for 7 days

after admission

7

Yu et al.

2022

China

Retrospective single-center

111

66.67

58.49 ± 15.01

SAH

–

6.478

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

HHS, mFS, WFNS, DCI, Vasospasm, AHC, Rebleeding; Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

8

Zhou et al.

2022

China

Prospective single-center

287

68.99

61.55 ± 13.08

AIS

–

1.349

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

9

Dang et al.

2023

China

Retrospective cohort

2043 in original cohort

888 in PSM cohort

(MIMIC-IV database)

50.37 in original cohort

51.16 in PSM cohort

70.4 (57.9–81.8) in original cohort

71.5 (58.6–82.8) in PSM cohort

AIS

Thrombolysis or thrombectomy

4.57

LOS ICU, LOS hospital, 90 d all-cause mortality

30 d all-cause mortality

1-year all-cause mortality

In-hospital, 30 d, 90 d, 1-year

7

Huang et al.

2023

China

Retrospective single-center cross-sectional study

234

50.43

69 (57–78)

AIS

Thrombolysis or antiplatelet or anticoagulation

1.79

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Severity of AIS (NIHSS)

Predictive value of SIRI

–

7

Wang JJ et al.

2023

China

Prospective single-center

640

71.41

56.0 (48.0–64.0)

ICH

–

5.03

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Complicated infections mortality

30 d, 90 d, 1-year

8

Yan et al.

2023

China

Retrospective single-center

2802

61.67

68.02 ± 11.53

AIS

–

2.74

SAP

Predictive value of SIRI

7 days after admission

6

Yu et al.

2023

China

Prospective single-center observational study

378

66.93

63.54 ± 13.72

ICH

–

–

SAP

Predictive value of SIRI

–

7

Chu et al.

2023

China

Retrospective single-center

240

33.75

66.00 (60.00–73.35)

AIS

IVT

1.00

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

8

Hou et al.

2023

China

Retrospective cohort

394 in original cohort

200 in PSM cohort

44.87

55.6 ± 9.8

aSAH

Coiling or Clipping

5.36

Functional outcome (assessed by mRS)

Predictive value of SIRI

90 d

9

Wang RH et al.

2023

China

Prospective multi-center observational

320

66.56

62.5 (51.3–73)

ICH

Nasogastric tube surgery

2.291

SAP

Predictive value of SIRI

7 days after admission

9