Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: A literature review and meta-analysis of the optimal factors study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-infarction aphasia

Study

Mean age

Sample size (male/female)

Intervention details

Targeted brain region

Period (week)

Number of sessions

Frequency

Duration of

sessions

Outcome

Bai et al. (2020)

45.3 ± 6.8

30 (13/17)

1 Hz, 80% RMT, 1000 pulses/session

RIFG

4

20/40

5/week

20 min

AQ

Barwood et al. (2013)

rTMS: 60.8 ± 6

CON: 67 ± 13.1

rTMS: 6(4/2)

CON: 6(5/1)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 1200 pulses/session

RIFG

2

10

5/week

20 min

BDAE

Chen et al. (2012)

rTMS: 62.9 ± 12.1

CON: 65.1 ± 10.9

rTMS: 22(12/10)

CON: 21(11/10)

0.5 Hz, 80% RMT, 600 pulses/session

RIFG

4

20

5/week

NA

AQ

Fu et al. (2016)

rTMS: 59.77 ± 5.4

CON: 61.47 ± 6.0

rTMS: 24(14/10)

CON: 24(12/12)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 1200 pulses/session

RIFG

8

40

5/week

20 min

CRRCAE

Haghighi et al. (2017)

rTMS: 61.7 ± 7.1

CON: 60.5 ± 11.9

rTMS: 6(3/3)

CON: 6(2/4)

1 Hz, 100% RMT, 1000 pulses/session

RIFG

2

10

5/week

30 min

AQ

Heiss et al. (2013)

rTMS: 68.5 ± 8.2

CON: 69.0 ± 6.3

rTMS: 17

CON: 14

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 800 pulses/session

RIFG

3–4

10

NA

20 min

AAT

Heiss et al. (2013)

rTMS: 61.0 ± 9.8

CON: 57.4 ± 9.6

rTMS: 19(8/11)

CON: 10(5/5)

R: 1 Hz; L: 20 Hz; 80%-110% RMT, 1000 pulses/session

DIFG

2

10

5/week

NA

ASRS

Li et al. (2018)

rTMS: 65.3 ± 5.6

CON: 68.3 ± 5.8

rTMS: 15(9/6)

CON: 15(7/8)

1 Hz, 80% RMT, 1200 pulses/session

RIFG

3

15

5/week

20 min

WAB

Ren et al. (2019)

rTMSw: 65.95 ± 8.5

rTMSb: 62.46 ± 10.9

CON: 63.6 ± 16.7

rTMS-w: 18(7/6)

rTMS-b: 13(9/6)

CON: 15(9/6)

1 Hz, 80% RMT, 1200 pulses/session

RIFG

3

15

5/week

20 min

AQ

Rubi-Fessen et al. (2015)

rTMS: 67.9 ± 8.1

CON: 69.6 ± 6.6

rTMS: 15(10/5)

CON: 15(6/9)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 800 pulses/session

RIFG

2

10

5/week

20 min

AAT

Seniów et al. (2013)

rTMS: 61.8 ± 11.8

CON: 59.7 ± 10.7

rTMS: 20(8/12)

CON: 20(10/10)

1 Hz, 80% RMT, 1800 pulses/session

RIFG

3

15

5/week

30 min

BDAE

Shen et al. (2016)

rTMS: 60.2 ± 10.5

CON: 57.5 ± 11.9

rTMS: 20(11/9)

CON: 20(8/12)

0.5 Hz, 90% RMT, 384 pulses/session

RIFG

3

15

5/week

NA

AQ

Thiel et al. (2013)

rTMS: 69.8 ± 8

CON: 71.2 ± 7.8

rTMS: 13

CON: 11

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 800 pulses/session

RIFG

2

10

5/week

20 min

AAT

Tsai et al. (2014)

rTMS: 62.3 ± 12.1

CON: 62.8 ± 14.8

rTMS: 33(24/9)

CON: 23(17/6)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 600 pulses/session

RIFG

2

10

5/week

10 min

CCAT

Waldowski et al. (2012)

rTMS: 62.3 ± 11

CON: 60.2 ± 10.6

rTMS: 13(6/7)

CON: 13(7/6)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 800 pulses/session

RIFG

3

15

5/week

30 min

BDAE-ASRS

Wang et al. (2014)

rTMS: 61.7 ± 13.8

CON: 60.4 ± 11.9

rTMS: 30(27/3)

CON: 15(13/2)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 1200 pulses/session

RIFG

2

10

5/week

20 min

CCAT

Weiduschat et al. (2011)

rTMS: 66.7 ± 9.1

CON: 63.8 ± 4.4

rTMS: 6(1/5)

CON: 4(4/0)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 1200 pulses/session

RIFG

2

10

5/week

20 min

AAT

Yoon et al. (2015)

rTMS: 60.5 ± 9.6

CON: 61.1 ± 8.7

rTMS: 10(8/2)

CON: 10(7/3)

1 Hz, 90% RMT, 1200 pulses/session

RIFG

4

20

5/week

20 min

AQ

  1. AQ aphasia quotient, AAT Aachen Aphasia Test, BDAE Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, CRRCA Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center aphasia examination, ASRS Aphasia Severity Rating Scale, CCAT Concise Chinese Aphasia Test, NA not available, RIFG right inferior frontal gyrus, DIFG dual inferior frontal gyrus, RTP right temporoparietal region, Period period of each therapy condition