Skip to main content

Table 2 Study-level risk of bias analysis

From: A literature review and meta-analysis of the optimal factors study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-infarction aphasia

Study

Bias arising from the randomization process

Bias due to deviations from the intended intervention

Bias due to missing outcome data

Bias in measurement of the outcome

Bias in selection of the reported result

Overall

Bai et al. (2020)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Barwood et al. (2013)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Chen et al. (2012)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Fu et al. (2016)

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Low

Some concerns

Haghighi et al. (2017)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Heiss et al. (2013)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Heiss et al. (2013)

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Some concerns

Li et al. (2018)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Ren et al. (2019)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Rubi-Fessen et al. (2015)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Seniów et al. (2013)

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Some concerns

Shen et al. (2016)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

Thiel et al. (2013)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Tsai et al. (2014)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Waldowski et al. (2012)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Wang et al. (2014)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Weiduschat et al. (2011)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Yoon et al. (2015)

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low