Skip to main content

Table 4 GRADE assessment of the biomarkers

From: Evaluating biomarkers for contrast-induced nephropathy following coronary interventions: an umbrella review on meta-analyses

Quality assessment

Quality

No of studies

Design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

NGAL

 14

Observational studies

Serious

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Reporting bias very strong association

⊕⊕〇〇 low

Cystatin-C

 10

Observational studies

Serious

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Very strong association

⊕⊕⊕〇 moderate

uKIM-1

 9

Observational studies

Serious

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Reporting bias very strong association

⊕⊕〇〇 low

BNP

 12

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Very strong association

⊕⊕⊕⊕ high

GGT

 4

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Strong association

⊕⊕⊕〇 moderate

Albumin

 5

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Reporting bias strong association

⊕⊕〇〇 low

V/CR

 6

Observational studies

Serious

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Reporting bias strong association

⊕〇〇〇 very low

Preprocedural hyperglycemia over 200

 7

Observational studies

Serious

Serious

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Strong association

⊕〇〇〇 very low

Preprocedural hyperglycemia over 140

 4

Observational studies

Serious

Serious

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

⊕〇〇〇 very low

RDW

 5

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

⊕⊕〇〇 low

Uric acid

 18

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Reporting bias

⊕〇〇〇 very low

PLR

 4

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

⊕⊕〇〇 low

NLR

 5

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

⊕⊕〇〇 low

HS-CRP

 9

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Reporting bias

⊕〇〇〇 very low

CRP

 5

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

⊕⊕〇〇 low

BUN

 3

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

⊕⊕〇〇 low

HCT

 8

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

⊕⊕〇〇 low