We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.
The use of chicken legs for teaching wound closure skills
© I. Holzapfel Publishers 2009
- Received: 10 March 2009
- Published: 28 September 2009
Training models are required to impart surgical skills, like wound closure techniques, prior to practice in patients. In an ideal case, the tissue characteristics of the model are close to those of humans, easy to create and of low cost.
Here, we describe a model to train students in wound closure technique using conventional chicken legs obtained from the supermarket.
The described model has good tissue characteristics, does not require any lavish preparation and is of minimal cost (0.62 Euro or 0.78 USD).
Chicken legs appear to be an appropriate tool for teaching wound closure techniques.
- Medical undergraduate education
- surgical skills
- wound Closure
- chicken legs
Traumatic wounds or skin lacerations are among the most common injuries, occurring in people of all ages. Given this, it is rational to impart wound evaluation and closure techniques to medical undergraduate students during their surgical curriculum. Although most wounds and tissue defects heal without complication after direct suturing, some wounds require advanced techniques like Z-plasty, V-Y-plasty or an oval-shaped advancement flap to avoid hypertrophic scar formation or disturbance of primary wound healing [1–6]. These advanced techniques may be used to reduce tension on the wound edges and to allow better approximation of the epidermis . Models are warranted to train these surgical skills since they require accurate planning and abstract visualization of shifting and rotating the cutaneous flap. Poor surgical execution can lead to poor skin perfusion and a larger resulting cutaneous defect. Although various teaching models exist for teaching these particular skills, they differ with respect to their required expense and preparation time [7–16]. However, the most important requirement of the particular model should be the ability to transfer validly and reliably . Here, we introduce a new, simple and inexpensive model with this potential: to train wound closure techniques using chicken legs.
The model uses packed Class A chicken legs (GEKA Frisch+Frost Handels GmbH & Co. KG, Visbek, Germany) obtained from the supermarket (Aldi-Süd, Mülheim, Germany) (4 legs = 1100 g for 2.49 €) that were stored at 4°C.
The required equipment for training of wound closure technique are an unsterile pad (i) red and blue ink (ii) surgical instruments (forceps, scissor, needle-driver, No. 15 scalpel) and (iii) monofilament 4-0 suture material.
2.3 Wound closure
The chicken legs were first placed on the pad in a semi-frozen state at about 4°C after removal from the refrigerator. Thereafter, the simulated skin defect was drawn with red ink and the incisional lines for the particular wound closure technique with blue ink. Three different techniques were taught using one leg. The particular incisions were placed and the skin was mobilized as necessary after excision of the defect. The wound closure was completed by single sutures after rotation and swivel of the cutaneous defect.
There are different models available to train wound closure techniques, including bench models, living animals and their limbs and organs [7–16]. The ideal model should come close to the tissue properties of humans and enable the student to transfer skills from the training environment to the patient. Most of the available training models run in workshops rather than being incorporated into a structured curriculum, which is most likely attributed to the efforts needed for preparation and expenses. Therefore, the training model should be easy to obtain and to prepare and have low costs. Finally, the training model should not be open to ethical concerns and should be harmless in terms of the transmission of infectious disease. Almost all bench models require some time for preparation, and the tissue condition of the form material is not similar to those of humans. The porcine digit represents one of the most frequently used models to impart wound closure techniques. However, its skin is very tough and, due to the small circumference and size of the digit, has little usable surface. Other models, using detached rat skin that was previously used for research purposes, require tremendous efforts for set-up. Using living animals for teaching wound closure which allows to see the perfusion result of the lifted flap, as advocated by one group, seems to be questionable based on ethical concerns and because of the high costs and necessary preparation time . Taking this into account, chicken legs closely meet the requirements of a trainings model for teaching wound closure techniques in our hands. The model itself does not need any time for preparation and is inexpensive, at about 0.62 € (0.78 USD) for a chicken leg. The curved plane of the chicken legs allows simulation of a more challenging wound closure, where exact mobilization of the surrounding tissue is needed (as compared to the simple plane surface present in conventional bench models). The tissue condition and size are suitable for training and allowing multiple attempts. However, gentle tissue handling is required due to the thin skin of the chicken legs what need not to be a disadvantage as it also needed in surgical practice when closing wound at the patients hand or face.
- Reichman EF, Kolm L: Advanced wound closure techniques. In Emergency Medicine Procedures, McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York Edited by: Reichman EF, Simon RR. 2004, 736–747.Google Scholar
- Hove CR, Willams EF, Rodgers BJ: Z-plasty: a concise review. Facial Plast Surg 2001, 17: 289–294. 10.1055/s-2001-18828PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson EA: The V-Y plasty in the treatment of fingertip ampitations. Am Fam Physician 2001, 64: 455–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu T: Plastic surgery made easy - simple techniques for closing skin defects and improving cosmetic results. Aust Fam Physicain 2006, 35: 492–496.Google Scholar
- Goldman GD: Rotation flaps. Dermatol Surg 2005, 31: 1006–1013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen EH, Johnson TM, Ratner D: Introduction to flap movement: reconstruction of five similar nasal defects using different flaps. Dermatol Surg 2005, 31: 982–985.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tokuhara KG, Boldt DW, Yamamoto LG: Teaching suturing in a workshop setting: a comparison of several models. Hawaii Med J 2004, 63: 258–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole FL, Ramirez EG: Beef tongue: a model for teaching complex wound closure to emergency nurse practitioner students. J Emerg Nurs 2002, 28: 467–468. 10.1067/men.2002.127762PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snell GF: A method for teaching techniques of office surgery. J Fam Pract 1978, 7: 987–990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dinsmore RC, North JH: Basic skin flaps for the general surgeon: a teaching method. South Med J 2000, 93: 783–786.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence TL, Wiviott W: Use of turkey skins for surgical teaching. J Fam Pract 1978, 6: 69–70.Google Scholar
- Wanzel KR, Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ: Teaching technical skills: training on a simple, inexpensive, and portable model. Past Reconstr Surg 2002, 109: 258–263. 10.1097/00006534-200201000-00041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anders KH, Goldstein BG, Lesher JL Jr, Shimp RG, Chalker DK: The use of live pigs in the surgical training of dermatology residents. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989, 15: 734–736.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuwahara RT, Rasberry R: Pig head model for practice cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg 2000, 26: 401–402. 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99301.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Altinyazar HC, Hosnuter M, Unalacak M, Koca R, Babuccu O: A training model for cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg 2003, 29: 1122–1124. 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29350.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sillitoe AT, Plat A: The Z-plasty simulator. Ann R Coll Surg 2004, 86: 304–305.Google Scholar
- Cosman P, Hemli JM, Ellis AM, Hugh TJ: Learning the surgical craft: a review of skills training options. ANZ J Surg 2007, 77: 838–845. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04254.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar