Open Access

Functional and radiological evaluations of high-energy tibial plateau fractures treated with double-buttress plate fixation

European Journal of Medical Research200914:200

https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-14-5-200

Received: 22 March 2009

Accepted: 26 March 2009

Published: 14 May 2009

Abstract

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of patients with complex tibial plateau fractures treated with double-buttress plate fixation.

Methods

Sixty five cases of complex (Schatzker type V and VI) tibial plateau fractures were treated with double-buttress plate fixation in our centre from September 2001 to September 2006 through two separate plate incisions. Fifty four patients were followed up for a period ranging from 12 to 48 months and evaluated for the functional and radiological outcomes by a series of standard questionnaire and measurement.

Results

Due to the good exposure without any extensive soft-tissue dissection of the double-buttress plate fixation, the fractures in all 54 patients were healed and the treatment achieved greater than 90% of satisfactory-to-excellent rates of reduction. The mean time of bone union was 15.4 weeks (range, 12-30 weeks), and the mean time of full weight-bearing was 18.7 weeks (range, 14-26 weeks). At the final follow-up visit, no patients showed knee instability; the mean range of motion was 107.6° (range, 85°-130°). For all patients, no statistically significant difference in the functional outcomes was observed between their 6-months and final follow-up visits; or in the radiological findings between their immediate postoperative and final follow-up examinations.

Conclusion

Double-buttress plate fixation is a feasible treatment option for bilcondylar and complex tibial plateau fractures. Although technically demanding, it offers reliable stability without additional postoperative adjuvant external fixation, and at the same time avoids extensive soft tissue dissection, allowing the early painless range of motion.

Keywords

Functional OutcomeRadiological OutcomeTibial Plateau FractureFracture FixationDouble Buttress Plate

Introduction

High-energy tibial plateau fractures remain a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons, with the bicondylar type (Schatzker type V) and the comminuted type (Schatzker type VI) fractures being the most difficult to treat [1]. The severity of the tibial plateau fracture depends on the energy applied to the limb. The higher the energy to the limb, the more severe and complex the fracture is. Compared to their low-energy counterparts, high-energy fractures have unique patterns of fractures. The bicondylar type fracture involves both the lateral and medial tibial plateaus, usually with lateral depression, meniscal detachment, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsions [2]. The comminuted type fracture is characterized by the dissociation of the diaphysis from the metaphysis, often associated with severe soft tissue injuries around the knee that require special clinical consideration [3].

Treatment goals of high-energy tibial plateau fractures are to restore the joint stability, congruity, and alignment with minimal soft tissue dissection to allow early joint motion and weight bearing. However, these aims may be difficult to achieve because of the high complication rates and the poor outcomes associated with the surgical treatment. For example, external fixators often cause permanent joint stiffness due to the restriction of early range of motion following the operation. Traditional open reduction and internal fixation with insertion of a single or double buttress plates through a single incision usually requires extensive stripping of the tenuous soft tissue envelope of the proximal tibia, leading to considerable devascularization of fracture fragments, thus delaying fracture healing and increasing the risks of infection and non-union [4].

In an attempt to improve the treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fractures, improved internal fixation with double buttress plates applied through a medial and a lateral incisions has been widely adopted. This technique allows anatomic joint reduction with minimal iatrogenic soft tissue damage and its associated complications, provides adequate fixation of the fracture, and permits early functional range of motion.

In this study, we evaluated the postoperative functional and radiological outcomes of 54 patients with high-energy tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker type V or type VI) treated with the double-buttress plate fixation through a medial and a lateral incisions.

Materials and methods

Patients

From September 2001 to September 2006, 65 patients with complex (Schatzker type V or type VI) tibial plateau fractures were treated with the double-buttress plate fixation in the Orthopedic Surgery Center of the Fourth Military Medical University associated Tangdu Hospital,. The general patient information including the pre-injury status was recorded at admission. All fractures were fixed with a bilcondylar double-plating technique by experienced orthopaedic surgeons. Fifty four of the sixty five patients were investigated for the functional and radiological outcomes, and the other eleven patients were excluded for the following reasons: four patients changed their address and could not be contacted, five patients had open fractures, and the other two patients were polytrauma. The patient demographics and fracture types of the 54 patients were collected preoperatively and are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Patient demographics and fracture types

Details

Number (%)

Age (years)

45.2 (rang 19-68)

Side

Left: 29 (53.7); right 25 (46.3)

Gender

Female 21 (38.9), male 33 (61.1)

Isolated fracture

42 (77.8)

Multiple fractures

12 (22.2)

Fracture pattern (Schatzker classification)

Schatzker V 23 (42.6), Schatzker VI 31 (57.4)

Radiologic studies

The compartment syndrome and the neurovascular status were evaluated by a series of radiographic studies. The degree of maximal joint depression was measured in millimeters before the operation, and the displacement and joint congruity were evaluated with radiographs of anteroposterior, lateral and 45° oblique views. Computerized tomography (CT) was performed for 75% of cases as needed. Ligament and meniscal injuries were determined using Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The tibial plateau angle (TPA), the femorotibial angle (FTA) and the medial posterior slop angle (PA) were measured on a digital X-ray image marked with a scale [5].

Operative planning and surgical technique

The soft-tissue envelope was recovered before the extensive incisions were made. The skin should be soft, blisters should be epithelialized, and skin wrinkles should be present. A high thigh tourniquet was routinely used during the operation. A laterally based plate (4.5 mm, T-shaped or L-shaped) was inserted via a lateral incision. Then a second medial incision was made approximately 1 cm apart from the posterior border of the tibia. Another plate was inserted through an interval created between the medial head of the gastrocnemius and the pes anserinus tendons, and was positioned at the lower portion of the medial condyle's superior border serving as a buttress plate. During the reduction and fixation, the knee was then put in extension by applying traction. The depressed articular surface was elevated and the resulted bony defect was filled with bone substitute before the fixation. Auto graft was routinely used when the bone graft was necessary. The meniscus was repositioned and repaired using outside-in technique or experienced meniscectomy if it was trapped in the joint. Postoperatively continuous passive motion was applied and the active knee flexion begun at 48 h following the surgery. A functional position brace was used for 4-6 weeks if the fractures were severe comminuted, and a hinged brace was used for 12-16 weeks if the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was injured.

Follow-up

The fifty four patients were followed up for a period ranging from 12 to 48 months (mean, 23.7 months). The length of surgery and the duration of hospital stay were recorded for each case. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up and the subsequent follow-up visits, patients were asked to attend an outpatient clinic where a survey of the HSS score, the Lysholm score and the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score was registered to assess patients' satisfaction, with a maximum of 100 points for each category. Postoperative A-P X-rays of the knee were taken at week 6, week 12, and every 6 to 8 weeks subsequently until bony union occurred, and then every 6 months until 2 years after the operation, or until the removal of the plates. The reduction of the fracture was graded as excellent if the residual depression was 2 mm or less, satisfactory if the residual depression was between 2 and 5 mm, and poor if the depression was greater than 5 mm. Malreduction was defined as intraarticular step-off of 5 mm or more, or a TPA ≥ 95°/TPA ≤ 80°, or PA ≥ 15°/PA ≤ -5°. Radiological bony union was defined by the corresponding surgeon as at least three cortical unions. The type and number of implants used were noted in each case. Complications requiring further surgery were also recorded.

Statistical analysis

SPSS12.0 was used for data variation analysis. The mean and the standard deviation for baseline descriptive characteristics were calculated. Statistical comparisons between 6-month postoperative and final follow-up HSS, Lysholm, and Knee Society Clinical Rating scores were made using paired Student's t-test, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Similarly, statistical comparisons between the 6-month postoperative and the final follow-up TPA, PA, FTA were also conducted using paired Student's t-test, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The satisfactory-to-excellent rate of reduction was compared using chi-square test (χ2 test).

Results

The surgical details are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Surgical details of the 54 cases of high-energy tibial plateau fractures

Details

Number (%)

Average time to surgery

10.4 days (rang: 1-19 days)

Preoperative preparation

Traction: 19 (35.2); bridging external fixator or brace: 30 (55.6); emergency operation: 5 (9.3)

Mean operation time (minutes)

158.4 (100-270)

Bone graft

Autograft: 37 (64.8); Allograft: 0

Meniscus repair or excised

Yes: 19 (35.2); no: 35 (64.8)

ACL inertion fixation

Yes: 6 (11.1); no: 48 (88.9)

Lateral implant

4.5-T-shaped: 20 (37.0); 4.5-L-shaped: 13 (24.1); 3.5-LCDCP: 21 (38.9)

Medial implant

3.5-LCDCP: 12 (22.2); 4.5-T-shaped: 25 (46.3); 4.5-L-shaped: 17 (31.5)

Postoperative management

Early exercise 34 (63.0); Traction: 7 (12.9); external brace: 13 (24.1)

Clinical follow-up evaluations

A follow up ranging from 12 to 48 months (mean, 23.7 months) showed that all fractures were healed. The mean time between the operation and bone union was 15.4 weeks (range, 12-30 weeks), and the mean interval between the operation and full weight-bearing was 18 weeks (range, 14-26 weeks). At the final clinical follow-up, no patients showed knee instability, and the mean range of motion was 107.6° (85°-130°) (Table 3). There were 9 cases suffering from stiffness of knee joint, 3 cases of varus abnormity, 2 cases of valgus abnormity, 2 cases of incisional wound infection (debridement and external fixation were performed with internal implants removed), 10 cases of traumatic arthritis of knee joint (2 cases received the total knee arthroplasty 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, and the other 8 cases did not receive any further operation during the follow-up periods), and 1 case of delayed union.
Table 3

Clinical summary of the 54 cases of high-energy tibial plateau fractures

Details

Number

Mean duration of follow-up (months)

23.7 (rang: 12-48)

Mean ROM

107.6° (85°-130°)

Mean time of bone union (weeks)

15.4 (range 12-30)

Mean time of full weight-bearing (weeks)

18.7 (range 14-35)

Functional evaluations

At the 6-month follow-up, the mean HSS score, the mean Lysholm score, and the mean Knee Society Clinical Rating Score were 81.0 (range, 42-94), 83.2 (range, 55-96), and 76.2 (range, 39-90), respectively. At the final follow-up, these three scores were 77.3 (range, 43-92), 79.5 (range, 56-95), and 70.3 (range, 39-91), respectively. Statistic analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the 6-month postoperative score and the final follow-up score in all the three score systems (Table 4).
Table 4

Functional scores of the patients

 

Postoperative (6 months)

Final follow-up

P value

HSS score

81.0 (range 42-94)

77.3 (range 43-92)

> 0.05

Lysholm score

83.2 (range 55-96)

79.5 (range 56-95)

> 0.05

Knee Society Clinical Rating Score

76.2 (range 39-90)

70.3 (range 39-91)

> 0.05

Radiological evaluations

Immediate postoperative imaging showed the satisfactory-to-excellent rate of reduction was 94.4%, the mean TPA was 86.0° ± 4.2°, PA was 9.4° ± 3.3°, and FTA was 176° ± 2.0°. Subsequent postoperative A-P X-rays of the knee were taken at week 6, week 12, and every 6 to 8 weeks until bony union occurred, and then taken every 6 months until 2 years after the operation or until the removal of the plates. A-P X-rays taken at the final follow-up showed the satisfactory-to-excellent rate of reduction was 90.7%, the mean TPA was 85.3° ± 4.0°, PA was 9.3° ± 3.8° and FTA was 175° ± 2.6°. Statistically, no significant difference was observed between the immediate postoperative imaging and the final follow-up imaging (Table 5) (Figure 1, 2).
Table 5

Radiological outcomes of the patiens

 

Postoperative

Final follow-up

P value

The satisfactory-to-excellent rate

94.4% (51/54)

90.7% (49/54)

> 0.05

Mean TPA

86.0° ± 4.2°

85.3° ± 4.0°

> 0.05

Mean PA

9.4° ± 3.3°

9.3° ± 3.8°

> 0.05

Mean FTA

176° ± 2.0°

175° ± 2.6°

> 0.05

TPA: tibial plateau angle; PA: posterior slope angle; FTA: femorotibial angle.

Figure 1

Left: a radiograph showing the bicondylar tibial plateau fracture (Schatzker Type V). Right: a radiograph taken one year after the operation showing the anatomic reduction.

Figure 2

A patient with the tibial plateau fracture (Schatzker Type V) before surgical removal of the double buttress plates.

Discussion

The tibial plateau fracture involves the major weight-bearing knee joint. To preserve normal knee function, treatment must aim to reestablish joint stability, alignment, and articular congruity to ensure a full range of motion. The treatment of tibial plateau fractures can be nonoperative or operative. Nonoperative treatment is a simple technique using traction mobilization or functional cast bracing but it has the potential risk of complications associated with prolonged traction or other forms of immobilization such as decubitus ulcers, urinary tract infections, pneumonias, muscle atrophy, contractures, mental deterioration, leading to a prolonged hospital stay. The advantages of the operative treatment such as anatomical reduction and early mobilization have been emphasized by many recent reports [6, 7]. Operative treatment includes internal and external fixation, hybrid fixation and arthroscopically assisted techniques. Among them, double-buttress plating represented open reduction and internal fixation technique gains the greatest popularity because of its advantages in diminishing the risks of articular incongruence, malalignment of mechanical load axis, and post-traumatic degenerative joint disease [8].

Although external fixation techniques using unilateral fixator, single-ring fixator, two-ring fixator, and circular frames (Ilizarov fixator) have been shown to treat high-energy tibial plateau fractures with severe soft tissue injuries effectively [9, 10], none of the above techniques except the two-ring fixation are comparable to double-buttress plating technique in terms of stability [11]. Some authors believe that open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws will bring a high rate of complications including deep infection, wound dehiscence and soft tissue problems [12]. However, in complex tibial plateau fractures, it is mandatory to anatomically reduce the articular part of the fracture in order to prevent the secondary arthritis and achieve a stable articular and metaphyseal fixation to facilitate the fracture healing regardless which treatment option is selected [13]. Moreover, soft tissue complications can be largely minimized by staging the treatment of the patient.

Bilcondylar tibial plateau fracture dislocation is a very unstable and serious condition caused by high-energy injury, and successful treatment requires an understanding of the fracture patterns. A single anterolateral or posteromedial approach makes both reduction and fixation of this unstable fracture pattern difficult [14]. Although a midline anterior approach using the same incision as that in the traditional total knee arthroplasty permits simultaneous exposure of both plateaus to facilitate later salvage arthroplasty, it unavoidably involves extensive soft-tissue dissection that will compromise the viability of the overlying soft tissue and devitalizes the underlying bone, resulting in an unacceptable incidence of soft tissue necrosis, wound dehiscence and deep infection [15]. With open reduction and internal fixation technique, the main fracture parts and the medial plateau are easily accessed through a lateral and a medial incisions with minimal soft tissue dissection.

Locking plates have gained popularity in recently years because of the improved rigidness. A single locking plate is inserted submuscularly through a limited incision with percutaneously placed locking screws to minimize soft tissue injury. However, Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures are the most comminuted and complicated types that involve both the joint surface damage and cancellous bone compression. If the incision is too small, fluoroscopic or direct visual evaluation of the anatomical reduction cannot be achieved [16]. Additionally, the position of the locking plate cannot be adjusted freely to fit the fracture pattern perfectly since the direction of the screw is predetermined by the thread in the plate. Studies have shown that a lateral locking plate is not always sufficient to protect the fracture from collapse, and an additional medial plate is necessary to further stabilize the fracture [17].

Another benefit of the double-buttress plating technique is that it makes the adjuvant external fixation (brace or plaster) unnecessary. As for severe comminuted tibial plateau fractures, traditional single-buttress plate fixation usually needs adjuvant external fixation to ensure the rigid immobile condition [18, 19]. However, prolonged cast immobilization of the knee often leads to some degree of permanent stiffness, thus it has been abandoned in our routine practice in the centre. The best treatment of patients who fail to regain knee motion during the first month following the surgery is passive continuous motion or other aggressive range-of-motion exercises under the instruction of a physical therapist. In our series, no iatrogenic displacements were found in any of the patients.

Soft tissue management is also a very important issue in the treatment of high-energy tibia plateau fractures as injuries often involved soft tissues, especially ACL, lateral collateral ligament (LCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL) and meniscus. Six patients suffered from ACL insertion avulsion fracture and were treated with ACL insertion fixation with screws. As the avulsion insertions were all fresh fractures, ACL reconstruction using patellar ligament, or gracilis and semitendinosus tendons was not required. After the ACL insertion fixation, a hinged brace was used for 12-16 weeks to protect the fixed ACL. LCL and MCL injuries are also common in the patients, but neither of them is complete, nor need any surgery.

Conclusion

This study, for the first time in China, evaluated the treatment efficacy of double-buttress plate fixation technique in high-energy Schatzker V and VI tibial plateau fractures. The postoperative functional and radiological outcomes indicate that this technique is a feasible treatment option for bicondylar and complex tibial plateau fractures. Our results are consistent with the international standards. Although technically demanding, the double-buttress plate fixation provides reliable stability without additional postoperative adjuvant external fixation. The potential postoperative complications associated with internal fixation can be reduced by practices including careful timing of surgery, extraperiosteal dissection and limited dissection of comminuted bone fragments.

Abbreviations

(ORIF): 

Open reduction internal fixation

(ACL): 

Anterior cruciate ligament

(LCL): 

Lateral collateral ligament

(MCL): 

Medial collateral ligament

(TPA): 

Tibial plateau angle

(FTA): 

Femorotibial angle

(PA): 

Posterior slop angle

(ROM): 

Rang of motion

(CT): 

Computerised tomography

(MRI): 

Magnetic resonance imaging

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (30330610, CHN). We thank Dr. Yunfei Zhang for the assistance with the data processing.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedics Oncology Institute of Chinese PLA, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University

References

  1. Ali AM, Yang L, Hashmi M, Saleh M: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures managed with the Sheffield Hybrid Fixator. Biomechanical study and operative technique. Injury 2001, 32: SD86–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkson EM, Virkus WW: High-energy tibial plateau fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006, 14: 20–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Papagelopoulos PJ, Partsinevelos AA, Themistocleous GS, Mavrogenis AF, Korres DS, Soucacos PN: Complications after tibia plateau fracture surgery. Injury 2006, 37: 475–484. 10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.035PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chin TY, Bardana D, Bailey M, Williamson OD, Miller R, Edwards ER, Esser MP: Functional outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated with the fine-wire fixator. Injury 2005, 36: 1467–1475. 10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.008PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Luo CF, Jiang R, Hu CF, Zeng BF: Medial double-plating for fracture dislocations involving the proximal tibia. Knee 2006, 13: 389–394. 10.1016/j.knee.2006.05.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Coles CP, Henley MB, Benirschke SK: Functional outcomes of severe bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with dual incisions and medial and lateral plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88: 1713–1721. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00907PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu CC: Salvage of proximal tibial malunion or nonunion with the use of angled blade plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006, 126: 82–87. 10.1007/s00402-006-0106-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chin TY, Bardana D, Bailey M, Williamson OD, Miller R, Edwards ER, Esser MP: Functional outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated with the fine-wire fixator. Injury 2005, 36: 1467–1475. 10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.008PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Piper KJ, Won HY, Ellis AM: Hybrid external fixation in complex tibial plateau and plafond fractures: an Australian audit of outcomes. Injury 2005, 36: 178–184. 10.1016/j.injury.2004.04.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Catagni MA, Ottaviani G, Maggioni M: Treatment strategies for complex fractures of the tibial plateau with external circular fixation and limited internal fixation. J Trauma 2007, 63: 1043–1053. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181238d88PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ali AM, Saleh M, Bolongaro S, Yang L: The strength of different fixation techniques for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures--a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003, 18: 864–870. 10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00149-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Stannard JP, Robinson JT, Anderson ER, McGwin G Jr, Volgas DA, Alonso JE: Negative pressure wound therapy to treat hematomas and surgical incisions following high-energy trauma. J Trauma 2006, 60: 1301–1306. 10.1097/01.ta.0000195996.73186.2ePubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kiene J, Schulz AP, Hillbricht S, Jürgens Ch, Paech A: Clinical results of resection arthrodesis by triangular external fixation for posttraumatic arthrosis of the ankle joint in 89 cases. Eur J Med Res 2009, 14: 25–29. 10.1186/2047-783X-14-1-25PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Higgins TF, Kemper D, Klatt J: Incidence and morphology of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009, 23: 45–51. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818f8dc1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Shah SN, Karunakar MA: Early wound complications after operative treatment of high energy tibial plateau fractures through two incisions. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2007, 65: 115–119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, Lorich DG: Posteromedial supine approach for reduction and fixation of medial and bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2008, 22: 357–362. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318168c72ePubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgins TF, Klatt J, Bachus KN: Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: how does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation? J Orthop Trauma 2007, 21: 301–306. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180500359PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Marti RK, Kerkhoffs GM, Rademakers MV: Correction of lateral tibial plateau depression and valgus malunion of the proximal tibia. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007, 19: 101–113. 10.1007/s00064-007-1197-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mann ST, Mann V, Stracke H, Lange U, Klör HU, Hardt P, Teichmann J: Fecal elastase 1 and vitamin D3 in patients with osteoporotic bone fractures. Eur J Med Res 2008, 13: 68–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© I. Holzapfel Publishers 2009

Advertisement