- Open Access
Prospective study comparing skin impedance with EEG parameters during the induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl and etomidate
© I. Holzapfel Publishers 2010
- Received: 3 September 2009
- Accepted: 1 October 2009
- Published: 26 February 2010
Sympathetic stimulation leads to a change in electrical skin impedance. So far it is unclear whether this effect can be used to measure the effects of anaesthetics during general anaesthesia. The aim of this prospective study is to determine the electrical skin impedance during induction of anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery with fentanyl and etomidate.
The electrical skin impedance was measured with the help of an electro-sympathicograph (ESG). In 47 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, anaesthesia was induced with intravenous fentanyl 10 μg/kg and etomidate 0.3 mg/kg. During induction, the ESG (Electrosympathicograph), BIS (Bispectral IndeX), BP (arterial blood pressure) and HR (heart rate) values of each patient were recorded every 20 seconds. The observation period from administration of fentanyl to intubation for surgery lasted 4 min.
The ESG recorded significant changes in the electrical skin impedance after administration of fentanyl and etomidate(p < 0.05). During induction of anaesthesia, significant changes of BIS, HR and blood pressure were observed as well (p < 0.05).
The electrical skin impedance measurement may be used to monitor the effects of anesthetics during general anaesthesia.
- skin impedance
- general anaesthesia
- cardiac surgery
Clinical assessment uses parameters such as heart rate and blood pressure to determine anaesthetic depth. Administration of etomidate in combination with fentanyl has been suggested for induction of anaesthesia in high-risk patients for cardiac surgery, because of their minor cardiovascular effects . The partly opposed effects of etomidate and fentanyl on heart rate and blood pressure do not allow to predict the adequacy of anaesthesia on the basis of these parameters [2–4]. This is particularly the case in cardiac high-risk patients, whose heart rate and blood pressure behaviour are often dictated by the underlying heart impairment and by heart medication. Cardiosurgical operations are considered to bear a higher risk of unintended intraoperative awareness compared to general surgical operations .
A previous study addressing EEG changes during a cardiosurgical operation with postoperative recall found no relationship between the time spent awake and EEG changes . In addition, Barr and colleagues observed an insufficient correlation between bispectral index and intraoperatively measured plasma midazolam and fentanyl levels and clinical assessment of anaesthetic depth in 10 cardiosurgical patients . In a study targeting the induction of anaesthesia using fentanyl in cardiosurgical patients, the same authors came to the conclusion that the BIS monitor is not capable to measure the hypnotic effects of fentanyl .
In a further study dealing with assessing anaesthetic depth by means of skin conductance measurements, the state of activity of the sympathetic nerve system was predicted with the help of the eccrine sweat gland duct filling. For this purpose, the authors measured the changes in a parameter called NSCF (number of skin conductance fluctuations). This parameter that correlates directly with bursts in the skin sympathetic nervous system was suggested to be an indicator of the analgesic effects of opioids during general anaesthesia .
Opiates, just like narcotics, act through central mechanisms thereby damping the activity of the sympathetic system, followed by changes in skin impedance. The aim of the present prospective study was to investigate the effects upon skin impedance of an intravenous bolus of fentanyl, which was given without previous administration of hypnotics, and a subsequent etomidate bolus.
For this purpose, the electrosympathicograph (ESG) was used to measure the changes in skin impedance in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
47 patients (ASA III), who were undergoing elective cardiosurgical intervention, were studied prospectively. Approval for the study was given by the local Medical Ethics Committee. All patients gave their written informed consent prior to being enrolled into the study.
Patients aged under 18 yr were excluded, as were those with neurologic or psychiatric diseases, intake of psychoactive mediation, abuse of drugs or alcohol,, skull-brain trauma in the patient's medical history, and hearing disorders.
Study and test procedures
All study measurements were carried out in an anaesthesia induction room patients laying on supine on an operation table. Prior to induction of anaesthesia, an invasive blood pressure measurement system via the arteria radialis was established, a venous catheter and a pulse oximeter were placed and an ECG (electrocardiogram) was administered. The invasively measured blood pressure and heart rate were stored directly online in a computer file with the assistance of the program AS3 collect (Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Anaesthesia Monitor System). All study participants were continuously administered 4 liters of O2 through a nasal probe. A BIS electrode (BIS Sensor XP) for BIS monitoring was attached to the forehead in accordance with the specifications from the manufacturer. As for ESG monitoring, 2 ECG electrodes were fastened to the palm (2nd and 3rd finger) of the non-dominating hand. The timers of the S/5 Anaesthesia Monitor System, BIS Monitor and ESG were synchronised prior to beginning the measurements. A serial cable was connected to both the BIS monitor and a laptop in order to enable continuous recording of the BIS values; the laptop stored the data in a text file with the help of the Microsoft Hyperterminal program. The ESG used a continuous real-time automatic online process to store the measured skin impedance data in a computer file over the entire period of time.
Gender (Male/Female), (n)
ASA III (n,%)
59 ± 17
170 ± 27
79 ± 18
ESG and BIS measurements
Skin impedance measurements were performed with the help of an electrosympathicograph (ESG) (ESG 1001 Monitor System, Dr. Janitzki Consulting Engineers, Altenbeken, Germany). The measurement was made in the constant direct current mode with the help of Ag/AGCl electrodes that were applied to a small skin area at a current density of < 2 μA/cm2. Every 200 ms (5 HZ), the impedance data were periodically recorded in real time , underwent analog signal processing and filtering, and were then transmitted to an analog-to-digital converter. The very large measurement range demanded that an analog-to-digital converter having a resolution of 18 bits plus sign be used. In order to not leave the measurement data susceptible to failure, digitization was done as soon as possible. Opto-couplers then transferred the digital data to a computer for further processing.
This computer predominantly fulfills three tasks: it organizes and controls the recording of the measurement data (likewise via optocouplers), performs the digital processing of the recorded measurement data and displays them on a monitor screen. Thirdly, the computer performs a quasi-continuous recording (every 0.2 seconds) of all digital measurement data in a non-volatile storage medium (storage space requirements: ca. 100 KByte per hour and channel). The data so stored can be exactly assigned to each single measurement and to a specific time, which allows them to be used by other computers and programs in a later processing.
The system's measurement range spans from 5000 Ω to 2,000,000 Ω. It is also possible to perform measurements below 5000 Ω, but then the measurement sensitivity is strongly reduced, and the temperature dependence of the sensors increases. Changes of up to 100 Ω are in the normal sensitivity range. The baseline impedance values on the insides of the hands are in the range from 10,000 Ω up to several 100,000 Ω.
Available skin impedance recording electrodes included standard ECG solid gel surface electrodes having a recording surface of 2.2 cm2, and consisting of a 5% KCl conductive adhesive gel (Conmed -1700 Clear-trace; Conmed Deutschland GmbH, Gross-Gerau, Germany).
The skin impedance monitor (ESG) records 5 measurement values per second. While the measurements are being made, the measurement data appear graphically on the monitor screen in the form of a tonic electrosympathicogram (tonic ESG) in a time function as ESG measurement curve expressed in KΩ (Kilo Ohm). These measurement values appear online in a diagram directly on the monitor screen without having undergone additional pre-processing. The tonic ESG measurement value in KΩ is updated every 5 seconds and shown in a numeric display. The method was recently published [11, 12].
For determination by bispectral analysis we used an A- 2000 BIS monitor (software version 3.3, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA). Every five seconds the Aspect 2000 BIS monitor delivers a new bispectral analysis, which is calculated retroactively from the past 15 seconds. For us to be able to do a statistical evaluation, BIS, ESG, blood pressure and heart rate values were taken every 20 seconds from the time of administration of fentanyl up to the time of intubation. Two investigators read all measurement values directly from the monitor screen and entered them into a previously developed test protocol. Prior to statistical analysis, all values entered by hand were examined for accuracy; this was achieved by comparing them to the values recorded online.
The statistical evaluation served the purpose of identifying possible correlations between skin impedance data and time and BIS values.
Possible temporal changes in ESG values were identified using the multivariate analysis of repeated measurements, a specific analysis method for time-dependent data. The time-dependent effect was quantified using Wilks' Lambda.
In addition to the absolute ESG values, any changes in the ESG values compared to the baseline value were also determined using the following two formulae: RESG(tx) = [ESG(tX) - ESG(t0)]./ESG(t0). And DESG(tx) = ESG(tX) - ESG(t0)
[RESG(tx) = relative change in ESG at the time of measurement; ESG(tX) = ESG at the time of measurement; ESG(t0) = ESG at baseline time point; DESG(tx) = change in ESG at the measurement time point].
This enables to look only at the course of the ESG values, independently of different absolute values.
The paired t-test compared the parameters (BIS, ESG) during their time course after administration of fentanyl and etomidate. Another operation that was done included computing Pearson's correlation coefficients between BIS and ESG values at the individual measurement time points.
A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical evaluation was done with the assistance of the SPSS program for Windows, version 14.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Relevant complications were not observed in any study participant. During the observation period, no patient experienced a decrease in peripheral saturation below 90. All 47 patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated at the end of the observation period. Thereafter, the surgical intervention was performed as planned. The observation period lasted 280 s for each patient
Pearson's Correlation at the individual measurement time points measured a significant (negative) correlation relationship between the absolute ESG values and BIS values at the beginning (r = -0,3; p = 0.04), 40s (r = -0,4; p = 0.005), 60s (r = -0,3; p = 0.02), 80s (r = -0,3; p = 0.04), 100 s (r = -0,3; p = 0.02), and 120s (r = -0,4; p = 0.03), after the injection of fentanyl. Administration of etomidate resulted in a significant (negative) correlation between the ESG difference values (DESG(tx)) and the BIS values at the measurement time points of 0s (r = -0,3; p = 0.03), 20s (r = -0,3; p = 0.03) and 40s (r = -0,4; p = 0.02).
The results of this study show the course of skin impedances measured by the ESG during induction of cardiosurgical anaesthesia with fentanyl and etomidate. Fentanyl bolus injection, and particularly the additional etomidate bolus injection, produced a noteable change in skin impedance over the whole clinical course. Skin impedances measured with the ESG showed a significant correlation with the bispectral index values at individual measurement time points. Many nonanesthetic factors affecting the EEG . Interpretation of the raw EEG is dependent on the experience of the electroencephalographer. But with an EEG sedative effects of different agents can be monitored [14, 15].
For this study to also assess the effect produced by fentanyl and etomidate, EEGs were administered using BIS monitoring in addition to the skin impedance measurements. Although detailed information regarding the computation algorithms used  are still to be provided by the manufacturer, bispectral EEG analysis is deemed to be the most established EEG procedure for predicting anaesthetic depth [17, 18].
Many studies were able to demonstrate that the BIS offers a reliable measure of sedation during general anaesthesia [19, 20]. The weak points of this method lie in the fundamental difficulty the EEG has in recording the subcortical activities during general anaesthesia. During a sevofluran anaesthesia, Katoh and colleagues found an insufficient prediction reliability of several EEG parameters with respect to patients movements in response to skin incision . Another point is that also the effects of nitrous oxide, ketamine and opiates cannot be computed with the help of the BIS during general anaesthesia . In a multicenter study involving 304 patients, Sebel and colleagues found that the BIS provides an insufficient prediction reliability regarding patients movements in response to skin incision in opiate-supplemented anaesthesias .
Fentanyl reacts on μ1, μ2, δ, as well as on κ receptors. Agonization of the κ-receptor results in slight sedation. The cortex has a great abundance of κ-receptors which may reduce electrical activity in the cortex and thus influence the EEG values measured.
The fact that our study found an impact on BIS values after injection of fentanyl can therefore be explained by a fentanyl agonization of the κ-receptor, but not by an agonization of the receptors μ1, μ2, δ that are responsible for analgesia . μ receptors are located in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal cord, and supraspinal locations include brainstem and sub-cortex .
The difference between our study and other studies addressing skin conductance measurements [26–29] is that we have evaluated the effects upon the impedance of the skin of a bolus dose of fentanyl, given without additional hypnotics. Furthermore, we studied the effects generated by an additional bolus administration of hypnotics to the same patients. Impedance electrodermal response and skin conductance reflect the activity in the skin sympathetic fibers. However, the experimental settings are different. Skin sympathetic reaction is triggered in subcortical and cortical regions of the CNS with input arising from the hypothalamus, the limbic system and the basal ganglia . Sympathetic efferent pathways descending from the hypothalamus run through the brainstem, synapsing with pre-ganglionic neurons in the Nc. intermediolaterales of the lateral horn. The second synapse is in the sympathetic trunk. The post-ganglionic neurites take their path as sympathetic-sudomotor fibers, together with the remaining portions of the peripheral nerves, up to neuroglandular junctions. Sympathetic activation by cortical and subcortical areas [31, 32] will therefore result in changes in the target organ, the eccrine sweat glands, that are exclusively innervated by the sympathetic nervous system. There is a direct correlation between the activity of the eccrine sweat glands and the changes in skin resistance . Using the constant current technique, Lidberg and Wallin have proved that there is a direct correlation between the discharge rate of skin sympathetic nerve portions and the amplitude of the simultaneously recorded skin impedance responses [34, 35].
The involvement of cortical structures has certainly interfered with skin impedance measurements under the influence of fentanyl. It is a commonly known fact that also emotions have an influence on the values obtained from skin impedance measurements, in addition to manual, visual and acoustic stimuli [36–38]. It can therefore be assumed that, depending on the vigiliance level , emotions, anxieties and acoustic disturbances encountered during induction of anaesthesia for a risk-bearing cardiosurgical intervention counteracted the sedative and vigilance-reducing effect of opiate drugs . The effect of fentanyl upon skin impedance probably would have been even more evident without these cortical influences. An interaction with opiate-induced effects such as nausea, thoracic rigidity, and influence on thermoregulation  cannot be excluded. In an intraoperative study involving 11 patients, Storm and colleagues have postulated that the analgesic effect of a general anaesthesia can be determined through measurements of the skin conductance . Geddes and colleagues examined 45 patients preoperatively and found a decrease in skin conductance only after premedication with diazepam, but not after premedication with intramuscular morphine.
In our study we were able to demonstrate that fentanyl has a significant impact on the skin impedance in the absence of additional hypnotics.
The fact that there are great variances in the baseline values of the individual patients poses a problem for the interpreation of skin impedance measurement data; our own data revealed that there were patients whose skin impedance was up to ten times higher than that of others. Skin resistance is also influenced by factors such as skin condition, the measurement electrodes used, and the recording site. This causes the measurement values to spread across a wide range.
Both administration of etomidate and of fentanyl result in direct changes in skin impedance. It appears to be possible to use the ESG for online recording of effects of opiates in general aneasthesia. Using multi-modal neuromonitoring setups involving skin impedance measurements and BIS monitoring in order to predict analgesic response and depth of hypnosis (BIS) during general anaesthesia seems to be an option for the future.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Stockham RJ, Stanley TH, Pace NL, King K, Groen F, Gillmor ST: Induction of anesthesia with fentanyl or fentanyl plus etomidate in high-risk patients. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1987, 1: 19–23. 10.1016/S0888-6296(87)92558-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sahin AS, Duman A, Atalik EK, Ogun CO, Sahin TK, Erol A, Ozergin U: The mechanisms of the direct vascular effects of fentanyl on isolated human saphenous veins in vitro. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005, 19: 197–200. 10.1053/j.jvca.2005.01.031PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paris A, Philipp M, Tonner PH, Steinfath M, Lohse M, Scholz J, Hein L: Activation of alpha 2B-adrenoceptors mediates the cardiovascular effects of etomidate. Anesthesiology 2003, 99: 889–895. 10.1097/00000542-200310000-00022PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hess WC, Ohe A: Does ketamine/propofol anesthesia possess antiarrhythmogenic quality? A perioperative study in aortocoronary bypass patients. Eur J Med Res 2001, 6: 543–550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips AA, McLean RF, Devitt JH, Harrington EM: Recall of intraoperative events after general anaesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass. Can J Anaesth 1993, 40: 922–926. 10.1007/BF03010093PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez RA, Edmonds HL Jr, Schroeder JA: Electroencephalogr. Clin Neurophysiol 1987, 4: 250–253.Google Scholar
- Barr G, Anderson RE, Samuelsson S, Owall A, Jakobsson JG: Fentanyl and midazolam anaesthesia for coronary bypass surgery: a clinical study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis, drug concentrations and recall. Br J Anaesth 2000, 84: 749–752.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barr G, Anderson RE, Owall A, Jakobsson JG: Effects on the bispectral index during medium-high dose fentanyl induction with or without propofol supplement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000, 44: 807–811. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440707.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gjerstad AC, Storm H, Hagen R, Huiku M, Qvigstad E, Raeder J: Comparison of skin conductance with entropy during intubation, titanic stimulation and emergence from general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51: 8–15. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01189.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Janitzki A, Föckeler W: A mobile system for signal adaptive data storage-application in physiological measurements. Measurement 1986, 4: 82–86. 10.1016/0263-2241(86)90012-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Winterhalter M, Schiller J, Münte S, Bund M, Hoy L, Weilbach C, Piepenbrock S, Rahe-Meyer N: Prospective Investigation into the Influence of Various Stressors on Skin Impedance. J Clin Monit Comput 2008, 22: 67–74. 10.1007/s10877-007-9107-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Winterhalter M, Münte S, Taschenbrecker P, Hecker H, Weilbach C, Osthaus AW, Gross M, Piepenbrock S, Rahe-Meyer N: Skin impedance correlates to sedation grade, plasma propofol concentrations and bispectral index during a target-controlled infusion of propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009, 26: 589–596. 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328329b149PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dimpfel W, Wedekind W, Keplinger I: Gender difference in electrical brain activity during presentation of various film excerpts with different emotional content. Eur J Med Res 2003, 8: 192–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimpfel W, Suter A: Sleep improving effects of a single dose administration of a valerian/hops fluid extract - a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled sleep-EEG study in a parallel design using electrohypnograms. Eur J Med Res 2008, 13: 200–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muttray A, Kürten R, Jung D, Schicketanz KH, Mayer-Popken O, Konietzko J: Acute effects of 200 ppm 1, 1, 1trichloroethane on the human EEG. Eur J Med Res 2000, 5: 375–384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosow C, Manberg PJ: Bispectral index monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2001, 19: 947–966. 10.1016/S0889-8537(01)80018-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, Forbes A, Chan MT: Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004, 363: 1757–1763. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16300-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lennmarken C, Sandin R: Neuromonitoring for awareness during surgery. Lancet 2004, 363: 1747–1748. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16335-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Struys M, Versichelen L, Mortier E, Ryckaert D, De Mey JC, De Deyne C, Rolly G: Comparison of spontaneous frontal EMG, EEG power spectrum and bispectral index to monitor propofol drug effect and emergence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998, 42: 628–636. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05293.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P: Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997, 86: 836–847. 10.1097/00000542-199704000-00014PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katoh T, Suzuki A, Ikeda K: Electroencephalographic derivatives as a tool for predicting the depth of sedation and anesthesia induced by sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 1998, 88: 642–650. 10.1097/00000542-199803000-00014PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johansen JW, Sebel PS: Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology 2000, 93: 1336–1344. 10.1097/00000542-200011000-00029PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sebel PS, Lang E, Rampil IJ, White PF, Cork R, Jopling M, Smith NT, Glass PS, Manberg P: A multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect. Anesth Analg 1997, 84: 891–899.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zubieta JK, Smith YR, Bueller JA, Xu Y, Kilbourn MR, Jewett DM, Meyer CR, Koeppe RA, Stohler CS: Regional mu opioid receptor regulation of sensory and affective dimensions of pain. Science 2001, 293: 311–315. 10.1126/science.1060952PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zubieta JK, Smith YR, Bueller JA, Xu Y, Kilbourn MR, Jewett DM, Meyer CR, Koeppe RA, Stohler CS: mu-opioid receptor-mediated antinociceptive responses differ in men and women. J Neurosci 2002, 22: 5100–5107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gjerstad AC, Storm H, Hagen R, Huiku M, Qvigstad E, Raeder J: Skin conductance or entropy for detection of non-noxious stimulation during different clinical levels of sedation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51: 1–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geddes SM, Gray WM, Millar K, Asbury AJ: Skin conductance responses to auditory stimuli and anticipatory responses before venepuncture in patients premedicated with diazepam or morphine. Br J Anaesth 1993, 71: 512–516. 10.1093/bja/71.4.512PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nisbet HI, Norris W, Brown J: Objective measurement of sedation. IV. The measurement and interpretation of electrical changes in the skin. Br J Anaesth 1967, 39: 798–805. 10.1093/bja/39.10.798PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goddard GF: A pilot study of the changes of skin electrical conductance in patients undergoing general anaesthesia and surgery. Anaesthesia 1982, 37: 408–415. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1982.tb01150.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koss MC, Davison MA, Bernthal PJ: Epinephrine inhibition of the electrodermal response in the cat. Psychopharmacology 1976, 50: 149–152. 10.1007/BF00430484PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Critchley HD, Elliott R, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ: Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2000, 20: 3033–3040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio AR: Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 1996, 6: 215–225. 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Price E, Korr I: Relationship between Sweat gland activity and electrical resistance of the skin. J Physiol 1957, 10: 505–510.Google Scholar
- Lidberg L, Wallin G: Sympathetic Skin Nerve Discharges in relation to Amplitude of Skin Response. Psychophysiology 1981, 268–270.Google Scholar
- Wallin G, Blumberg H, Hynnin P: Intraneural stimulation as a method to study sympathetic function in the human skin. Neuroscience Letters 1983, 36: 189–194. 10.1016/0304-3940(83)90263-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bini G, Hagbarth KE, Hynninen P, Wallin BG: Ther-moregulatory and rhythm-generating mechanisms governing the sudomotor and vasoconstrictor outflow in human cutaneous nerves. J Physiol 1980, 306: 537–552.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lipp O, Siddle D, Dall P: Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses. Psychophysiology 1998, 35: 452–461. 10.1111/1469-8986.3540452PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dettmers Chr, Faust H, Fatepour D, Tackmann W: Der sympathische Hautreflex- physiologische Grundlagen, Normalwerte und klinische Anwendungen. Fortschr Neurol Psychiat 1993, 61: 369–377. 10.1055/s-2007-999107PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liguori R, Donadio V, Di Stasi V, Plazzi G, Lugaresi E, Montagna P: Sleep stage-related changes in sympathetic sudomoteor and vasomotor skin respones in man. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111: 434–439. 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00294-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Becerra L, Harter K, Gonzalez RG, Borsook D: Functional magnetic resonance imaging measures of the effects of morphine on central nervous system circuitry in opioid-naive healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 2006, 103: 208–216. 10.1213/01.ane.0000221457.71536.e0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen X, McClatchy DB, Geller EB, Tallarida RJ, Adler MW: sThe dynamic relationship between mu and kappa opioid receptors in body temperature regulation. Life Sci 2005, 78: 329–333. 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.04.084PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Storm H, Myre K, Rostrup M, Stokland O, Lien MD, Raeder JC: Skin conductance correlates with perioperative stress. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002, 46: 887–895. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460721.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar