- Open Access
Nasal septum morphology in human fetuses in computed tomography images
© I. Holzapfel Publishers 2010
Published: 4 November 2010
Nasal septum deformation (NSD) may cause breathing dysfunction. The reason for a septal deviation is the developmental anomaly in growth of the elastic septum or its skeleton. Such a type of deviation is called physiological. Some deviations can result from the prenatal trauma. The aim of the work was the analysis of the anatomy of the nasal cavity with a special interest focused on the nasal septum and its deviation.
Materials and methods
The nasal cavity with its bones and septum was analyzed in CT images of 105 spontaneously aborted fetuses (57 males and 48 females) aged 12 and 40 weeks of gestation. We attempted to assess the morphometric development of the nasal cavity with tomographic scanning methods and to detect anatomical variations.
In 15 (14.3%) fetuses, NSD were detected on radiological sections. The angle between the virtual line from the sphenoid sinus ostium through limen nasi and the horizontal plane was 33.6 ± 2.3°, on average.
NSD may already be found in fetuses. The observation of the nasal cavity development enables to evaluate the growth and symmetry of the nasal septum and to foretell predispositions for dysfunction in the upper respiratory tract.
Studies of anatomical structures of human fetuses are difficult because of problems related to getting the observation material. Individual and ancestral development of the skull is of great interest of ontogenic anthropology and developmental anatomy. Studies of intra- and interpopulation differences, the mechanism of growth of brain structures, mastication muscles, skull bones, and dynamics and rhythm of development in different periods of progressive development are of great importance of orthodontists, neurologists, obstetricians, and other specialists. Last decades brought lots of information on the human growth in the fetal period mainly thanks to new imaging methods (sonography, MRI, and CT). Also, specific fetal structures of human organism, which control the aerodynamics of the airstream, provide heating, wetting, and cleaning of air, and regulate the development of the skull in particular periods are better known, more detailed, and helpful in an understanding of any developmental failures [1, 2]. The nose is the central feature of the human face, both anatomically and esthetically in its anatomic structure. Conditions of the nose can be roughly classified in three main groups: congenital, developmental, and acquired . Septal deviation is commonly a result of previous injury; hence deviation is believed to occur as a result of intra-uterine moulding and trauma during parturition . The presence of NSD in fetuses while still in utero also suggests a congenital element [5, 6]. The type of deformity appears to be determined largely by the period in the course of embryonic development at which the disturbing agent exerts its influence. Recent observations have indicated that maternal infections during pregnancy may be an important factor in pathological conditions of the newborn .
Malformations and the results of fetal disease of the nose are often of considerable importance to the survival and future welfare of a child. If severe, they may interfere with breathing, food taking, or both. When these functions are disturbed to a degree which threatens the normal growth of a child, the best possible correction is indicated .
Materials and methods
The study was performed in accord with the Declaration of Helsinki for Human Research and the study protocol was approved by an institutional Ethics Committee.
Age and gender in the studied age-groups of fetuses.
Age the fetuses (months)
CT scans were performed in 2.5 mm sequences from the tip of the anterior nasal spine to the root of the posterior nasal spine. Nasal septum was visible on every scan and could be used as a reference and orientation point in particular scans. Nasal cavities and related structures were examined by means of bilateral dissection. Reference images were obtained in the axial plane with 1 mm collimation using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT; Sensation 64, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and three-dimensional (axial, sagital, and coronal) reformatted images with 1 mm thickness were obtained via multiplanar imaging method. Nasal septum was evaluated on the base of CT scans and nasal septum deviation was assessed according to degrees of Mladina's and Cottle's classifications [9, 10].
NSD was observed in 15 fetal heads (14.3% of our material). Most of deviations were found in the 5-7 months old age-group (10.3%). Males were more often affected than females (8.6 and 5.7%, respectively). Frequency of nasal septum deviation increased from the 4th month of fetal age on. A significant correlation was found between the age of the fetuses and NSD frequency (F = 2.35, P = 0.0003).
In the analyzed fetal nasal cavities, we did not observe deformations of nasal septum due to vertical compression, which may give rise to microtrauma and fracture of the septum. Such microtraumas usually heal by fibrosis, which sometimes creates the processes, called spurs, on the septal surface usually at the borders with the vomer and ethmoid bones.
Following dimensions: high and width of nasal cavity, length of the septum, length, height, and width of the nose are dependent on the age. The smallest length increase is observed in Group I group: y = 0.51x + 3.22 and y = 0.50x + 3.24 for the length of nasal cavity and the length of nasal septum, respectively. In groups GII, GIII, and GIV, dynamics of growth of the face and nasal cavity are comparable, which reveals a constant growth tendency between weeks 17-24 of fetal life and which reaches the highest value in Group V as shown by the regression equations of y = 1.04x - 5.89 and y = 1.09x -7.91 for the length of nasal cavity and the length of the face, respectively.
Malformations and deformities of the nose and nasal structures have been resulting from the following: intrauterine and maternal exposures, components of hereditary conditions craniofacial clefs, encephaloceles, trauma in the prenatal and natal life, tumors and tumor ablation, infections, and iatrogenic causes [11, 12]. Recent reports suggest that absence or hypoplasia of the fetal nasal bone, in both the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, is a highly sensitive and specific marker of trisomy 21 [13, 14]. Microtraumas and deformities of the nose and different structures of the face skull may be a result of a long-lasting contact with the wall of the uterus or incorrect position of fetus during the fetal development. Cottle  differentiated temporary flattening and persistent deformation of nasal structures observed during intrauterine development.
Steiner  stated that trauma of the nose can be observed from the fourth month of fetal life and suggested that compression of the nose and its structures in the fetal life can be dependent on the position of extremities of the fetus. That notion was supported by the results of the present study, since we did not observe any deviations in the youngest groups of fetuses (Groups I and II, i.e., 3.5-4 months of fetal life). The deviations were observed only in older, larger fetuses which are at greater risk of microtraumas and deformations due to their longer contact with the uterus wall. Similar observations have been described by Jones et al  who studied correlations among nasal pyramid deformity, intrauterine stress, and defects in intramembranous ossification.
Unilateral deviations of type I and II, S- or C-shaped nasal cavity in older groups of the studied fetuses could result from a maldevelopment of the vomeropalatal complex, which often is responsible for the formation of nasal septal deviations in fetuses. Similar embryologic explanation has been suggested by Scott  and Nishimura .
Deviations can be observed in bony and cartilaginous parts of nasal septum . In the present study, both types of deviations were observed, but NSD of the bony part predominated. The main reason seems to be dislocation of the vomer which distorts the septum to one of the sides. We also observed unilateral deviation, mainly to the left side. Yilmaz  has similar observation. That author found the incidence of NSD in fetuses of 15%, of which 66% deviated to the left and 33% to the right side.
We observed different degrees of deviation, from mild which do not affect the wall of the nasal cavity to severe which press against the lateral wall. The deviations may influence the development of the face-skull to a varied degree, and the severe ones require operative postnatal treatment to enable breathing or to correct the nose shape. Large NSD in fetuses may cause the overgrowth of conchas and bulla ethmoidale on the opposite site. Compression acting on the deviating septum also can press the maxilla, which results in elevating of the floor of the nasal cavity and defective growth of the palate. These defects relate to the future orthodontic problems in children.
In our investigation we did not observe the absence or undergrowth of the nasal bone, which is characteristic of trisomy of the 21st chromosome. A common characteristic of patients with Down syndrome is a flat face with a small nose. In studies which evaluated the association between nasal bone hypoplasia and Down syndrome at 11-14 weeks gestation, nasal ossification was absent in 73% of Down syndrome fetuses vs. 0.5% of chromosomally normal fetuses, suggesting that nasal bone evaluation may be useful in screening for Down syndrome [14, 21]. We believe the present study points to a new factor, the congenital one, to the etiology of deformities of the nasal septum in fetuses.
In summary, nasal septal deformations influence the development of other structures of the nasal cavity. Type I and II of NSD were the most frequent deformations in vertical plane. The percentage of type I deformations decreases and that of type II increases with fetal age. Left-sided NSD were more frequent. A straight nasal septum was more frequent in female than in male fetuses. Following up the development of the nose in fetal life can help in recognition of disorders in the growth dynamics of upper airways and congenital diseases.
Conflicts of interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
We would to thank to Piotr Rutkowski for technical help and assistance in the study.
- Rosignoli L, Tonni G, Centini G: Cranial development in the first trimester: the use of 3D in the study of complex structures. Imaging Med 2010,2(3):251–7. 10.2217/iim.10.14View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guis F, Ville Y, Vincent S, Doumerc J, Pons C, Frydman R: Ultrasound evaluation of the length of the fetal nasal bones throughout gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995, 5: 304–7. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05050304.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koch B, Castillo M: Sinonasal Diseases. In Pediatric Neuroradiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2010:1391–418.Google Scholar
- Fulcheria E, Capuab E, Ragnib N: Pregnancy despite IUD: adverse effects on pregnancy evolution and fetus. Contraception 2003,68(1):35–38. 10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00074-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bianchi DW, Crombleholme TM, D'Alton ME: Fetology: Diagnosis and Management of the Fetal Patient. McGraw-Hill Professional, USA; 2000:191–241.Google Scholar
- Nyberg DA, McGahan JP, Pretorium DH: Diagnostic Imaging of Fetal Anomalies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003:335–80.Google Scholar
- Alpini D, Corti A, Brusa E, Bini A: Septal deviation in newborn infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1986,11(2):103–7. 10.1016/S0165-5876(86)80004-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neskey D, Eloy JA, Casiano RR: Nasal, septal, and turbinate anatomy and embryology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009,42(2):18–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mladina R, Bastaic L: What do we know about septal deformities. J Rhinol 1997, 2: 79–89.Google Scholar
- Cottle M: Concepts of nasal physiology as related to nasal surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1960, 72: 11. 10.1001/archotol.1960.00740010015003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kvinnsland S: The relationship between the cartilaginous nasal septum and maxillary growth during human fetal life. Cleft Palate J 1970, 7: 523–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruano-Gil D, Montserrat-Viladiu JM, Vilanova-Trias J, Burges-Vila J: Deformities of the nasal septum in human foetuses. Rhinology 1980, 18: 105–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gamez F, Ferreiro P, Salmean JM: Ultrasonographic measurement of fetal nasal bone in a low-risk population at 19–22 gestational weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004, 23: 152–3. 10.1002/uog.929View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cicero S, Curcio P, Papageorghiou A, Sonek J, Nicolaides K: Absence of nasal bone in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks of gestation: an observational study. Lancet 2001, 358: 1665–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06709-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steiner A: A certain aspect of nasal trauma in the prenatal period. Md State Med J 1959, 8: 557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones GN, Pringle DR, Yin Z, Carlton MM, Powell KA, Weinstein MB, Toribio RE, La Perle KMD, Kirschner LS: Neural crest-specific loss of Prkar1a causes perinatal lethality resulting from defects in intramembranous ossification. Mol Endocrinol 2010, 24: 6–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scott JH: The growth of the nasal cavities. Acta Otolaryngol 1959,50(3–6):215–24. 10.3109/00016485909129189View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishimura Y: Embryological study of nasal cavity development in human embryos with reference to congenital nostril atresia. Acta Anat (Basel) 1993,147(3):140–4. 10.1159/000147494View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manning KP, Singh SD: Hypoplasia of the nasal bones. J Laryngol Otol 1977, 91: 12.Google Scholar
- Yılmaz NA, Cicekcibasi AE, Emlik D, Yılmaz MT, Keles B, Salbacak A: Morphometric analyses of the development of nasal cavity in human fetuses: An anatomical and radiological study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010,74(7):796–802. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.04.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fong KW, Toi A, Salem S, Hornberger LK, Chitayat D, Keating SJ, McAuliffe F, Johnson J-A: Detection of fetal structural abnormalities with us during early pregnancy. Radiographics 2004, 24: 157–74. 10.1148/rg.241035027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar