- Open Access
Histopathological examination of newly-developed adhesive silicone denture relining material
© I. Holzapfel Publishers 2011
- Received: 26 May 2001
- Accepted: 25 April 2011
- Published: 25 July 2011
We aimed to evaluate the subcutaneous tissue reaction to a newly developed adhesive silicone denture relining material, SG, (Neo Dental Chemical Products Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan). We embedded the experimental material SG and another existing control material, Roeko Seal (RS), in the dorsal area of 22 male ddY mice. One week and 12 weeks after the embedding, the tissues surrounding the embedded materials were removed and a histopathological examination was performed. The results demonstrate that the basic histopathological aspects are the formation of granulation tissue and the change of the tissue to fibrous capsule over time. The results suggests that the newly-developed SG is safe as compared with the control RS, whose composition is similar.
- Tissue reaction
- Histopathological evaluation
- Silicone-containing material
Silicone bio-materials are inert, synthetic chemical compounds having a wide variety of forms, as well as various medical and dental uses. Chemically, silicones are polymers that include silicon together with carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and sometimes other chemical elements. Some common forms include silicone oil, silicone grease, silicone rubber, and silicone resin. Heatresistant and rubber-like silicone materials are commonly used in breast implants, cookware, medical applications, sealants, adhesives, lubricants and insulation.
We have developed a adhesive silicone denture relining material SG and conducted a histopathological evaluation. Because some endodontic materials, such as the root canal filling materials Vitapex [1–4] and Roeko Seal [5–9] have similar properties, we used chose Roeko Seal for use as a control material.
Main Components of Experimental and Control Materials.
Vinylpolysiloxane, Hydrogenpolysiloxane, Platinum catalyst
Polydimethylsiloxane, Silicone oil, Paraffin-base oil, Hexachloroplatinic acid, Zirconium dioxide
A total of 22 male 9-week-old ddY mice (weighing about 35 g and purchased from Japan SLC Inc., Hamamatsu, Japan) were bred in plastic cages with Paper clean floor mats (Peparlet Co., Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan) in an air-conditioned room with water and solid diet (Picolab Rodent Diet 20: Japan SLC Inc., Hamamatsu, Japan) during all experimental periods. The Matsumoto Dental University Committee for Animal Experimentation approved the study.
Experimental Periods and Number of Animals.
At 1 week and 12 weeks after injection, 3 mice from each group were anesthetized with isoflurane and gasair mixture, and the tissue surrounding the injection sites were excised. the excised tissues were immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.5 M phosphate buffered solution, embedded in paraffin, and sections were prepared.
The tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined by light microscopy for examination of histopathological changes. We followed the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guidelines for evaluating the local effects of injection materials [10, 11].
Experimental Group: SG
Control Group: RS
There has been considerable literature deveted to examining tissue reactions to biomaterials, especially at the time of development. Our evaluation was made using a comparative histopathological method, with existing materials as controls. We selected the control material RS because the composition and clinical field were nearly the same as for the new-developed SG. We performed our histopathological examinations following the ISO guidelines for evaluating the local effects of injection materials [10, 11].
The results were reported in terms of tissue reactions to the biomaterials. The silicone-containing biomaterials and their biocompatibilities were also investigated. In clinical dentistry, commercially-available silicone-containing materials include Vitapex [1–4] and Roeko Seal [5–9]. During present examination, the observation of 1-week specimens showed that a thin layer of necrotic area was formed. However, under the necrotic tissue, there were also numerous fibroblastic tissues. In RS control specimens, tissue reactions to RS included the formation of granulation tissue and a gradual change into fibrous capsules. There were also some inflammatory cells reactions re-
maining in the 12-week specimens. On the other hand, in the experimental SG-group specimens, there were almost no inflammatory cell infiltrations observed in 12-week specimens. Thus, this histopathological results means the injury irritation of SG is thought to be comparatively weak. Accordingly, we think there are no problems for use inside the human body.
In conclusion, we examined local effects through the subcutaneous tissue reaction to the newly-developed material SG. We used the existing material "Roeko Seal" as a control, and the results demonstrate that the basic histopathological reaction is the formation of fibrous capsule consisting of granulation tissue around the experimental and control embedded materials. Based on the present results, we conclude that the newly-developed SG provides an adequate additional relining material.
- Kawakami T, Nakamura C, Eda S: Fate of 14 C-labelled dimethylpolysiloxane (silicone oil) in a root canal filling material embedded in rat subcutaneous tissues. Dent Mater 1987, 3: 256–260. 10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80083-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawakami T, Eda S: Excretion of silicone oil embedded in rat subcutaneous tissue. Med Sci Res 1988, 16: 837.Google Scholar
- Kawakami T, Nakamura C, Uji H, Hasegawa H, Eda S: Fate of the silicone oil component of a root canal filling material embedded in rat subcutaneous tissue. J Matsumoto Dent Univ Soc (Matsumoto Shigaku) 1989, 15: 167–172.Google Scholar
- Kawakami T, Yoshikawa M, Eda S: Tissue reactions to dimethylpolysiloxane embedded subcutaneously in rats. Med Sci Res 1990, 18: 485–487.Google Scholar
- Silva-Herzog D, Ramirez T, Mora J, Pozos AJ, Silva LA, Silva RA, Nelson-Filho P: Preliminary study of inflammatory response to subcutaneous implantation of three root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2011. doi: 10.111/j.1365–2591.2010.01849.x.Google Scholar
- Tanomaru JMG, Cezare L, Goncalves M, Filho MT: Evaluation of the radiopacity of root canal sealers by digitization of radiographic images. J Appl Oral Sci 2004, 12: 355–357. 10.1590/S1678-77572004000400019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanomaru-Filho M, Tanomaru JMG, Leonardo MR, da Silva LAB: Periapical repair after root canal filling with different root canal sealers. Braz Dent J 2009, 20: 389–395.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucena-Martin C, Ferrer-Luque CM, Gonzalez-Rodriquez MP, Robles-Gijon V, de Mondelo JMN-R: A comparative study of apical leakage of Endomethasone, Top Seal, and Roeko Seal sealer cements. J Endod 2002, 28: 423–426. 10.1097/00004770-200206000-00001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbizam JVB, Souza M, Cecchin D, Dabbel J: Effectiveness of a silicon-based root canal sealer for filling of simulated lateral canals. Braz Dent J 2007, 18: 20–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Upman PJ: ISO 1099,3–6: Test for local effects after implantation. BONEZone 2006,5(1):50–52.Google Scholar
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 1: Evaluation and testing, ISO 10993–1:2003 (E). Geneva, Switzerland. 2003.Google Scholar