Open Access

Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields significantly improve time of closure and proliferation of human tendon fibroblasts

  • Claudine Seeliger1,
  • Karsten Falldorf2,
  • Jens Sachtleben2 and
  • Martijn van Griensven1Email author
European Journal of Medical Research201419:37

https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-19-37

Received: 1 August 2013

Accepted: 19 June 2014

Published: 5 July 2014

Abstract

Background

The promotion of the healing process following musculoskeletal injuries comprises growth factor signalling, migration, proliferation and apoptosis of cells. If these processes could be modulated, the healing of tendon tissue may be markedly enhanced. Here, we report the use of the Somagen™ device, which is certified for medical use according to European laws. It generates low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields that trigger effects of a nature that are yet to be determined.

Methods

A 1.5-cm wide, linear scrape was introduced into patellar tendon fibroblast cultures (N = 5 donors). Treatment was carried out every second day. The regimen was applied three times in total with 30 minutes comprising pulsed electromagnetic field packages with two fundamental frequencies (10 minutes of 33 Hz, 20 minutes of 7.8 Hz). Control cells remained untreated. All samples were analyzed for gap closure time, proliferation and apoptosis one week after induction of the scrape wound.

Results

The mean time for bridging the gap in the nontreated cells was 5.05 ± 0.33 days, and in treated cells, it took 3.35 ± 0.38 days (P <0.001). For cell cultures with scrape wounds, a mean value for BrdU incorporation of OD = 0.70 ± 0.16 was found. Whereas low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields treated samples showed OD = 1.58 ± 0.24 (P <0.001). However, the percentage of apoptotic cells did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields emitted by the Somagen™ device influences the in vitro wound healing of patellar tendon fibroblasts and, therefore, possibly increases wound healing potential.

Keywords

wound healing proliferation apoptosis low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields

Background

One of the most important advances in promotion of the healing process following musculoskeletal injuries has evolved from the insight that treatment of these injuries with prolonged immobilization may delay recovery and adversely affect normal tissues. Conversely, controlled early resumption of activity can promote restoration of function. Experimental studies in the several past decades confirm and help explain the deleterious effects of prolonged immobilization and the beneficial effects of activity on the musculoskeletal tissues [1, 2]. At the beginning of the healing process, controlled motion and loading of tendon and ligament repair tissue help align the regeneration of cells and collagen fibers, stimulate collagen synthesis and increase strength [36]. Early or excessive strain, however, can increase the inflammatory reaction and may damage repair tissue, leading to failure of the healing process [7].

However, not only mechanical loading or growth factor signalling is important for healing processes. DNA activity concerning transcription and translation, as well as cell cycle mechanisms, plays a pivotal role. Those activities comprise proliferation, migration and apoptosis of cells. If these processes could be modulated, the healing of tendon tissue may be enhanced markedly. This modulation could prevent the occurrence of excessive strain by accelerating tendon healing.

In order to study such processes in vitro, wound-healing assays have been carried out in tissue cultures for many years. These assays monitored cell behavior, including appraising the migration and proliferative capacities of different cells under various culture conditions. They generally involve growing cells to a confluent monolayer as a first step. The layer is ‘wounded’ by a scraping device (razor-blade, pipette tip, needle or cell-scraper). This penning in the cell layer gets repopulated because the cells on the wound edge are no longer contact-inhibited. At the cellular level, healing involves the cells’ detachment from and attachment to the matrix adjacent to the wound area, migration, and proliferation. This repopulation is microscopically observed over a time course to assess the gap closure time, the occupied area over time, or the rate of migration [810]. Moreover, proliferation and apoptosis are investigated regularly. Depending on the cell type, the growth factors present, and the extent of the wounded region, wound repair ranges from several hours to days.

Until the 1980s it was believed that biological information within cell systems was being transferred not only chemically but also physically via electromagnetic waves. Information of this nature activates or inhibits biochemical processes [11, 12].

Led by these findings in the early 1990s, Sachtleben GmbH, Hamburg, Germany developed the Somagen™ device, which supposedly stimulates the communication mechanisms of cells (Figure 1). The low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) electromagnetic signals have been described as affecting enzymes, cells, tissues and whole organisms. Even though the effects exerted by PEMF could be measured, the reasons for the reactions of the biological systems remain unidentified. However, several theories exist to explain these effects, for example the Larmor precession [13, 14], the hypothesis of Gartzke and Lange [15] or radical pair mechanism [1618] (for review see [19]). The application of the PEMF induces changes in cellular processes, among others, differentiation [20], apoptosis [21], DNA synthesis [22], protein expression [23], protein phosphorylation [24], anti-inflammatory effects [25] and hormone production [26].
Figure 1

The low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) emitting Somagen™ device. In this work, a specific ‘wound healing’ program lasting 30 minutes was used. The applied program consisted of two PEMF signal packages of 10 minutes at a fundamental frequency of 33 Hz and 20 minutes at 7.8 Hz.

PEMF instruments like the Somagen™ device generate low-frequency electromagnetic signals in order to accelerate, among others, wound healing response. This enhances the regeneration potential of the destroyed tissue, especially the stimulation of new formation of connective tissue, something for which the vasodilatation and increased cell division are likely responsible [27]. Furthermore, growth factor signalling, which is important for healing processes, can be influenced by low-frequency electromagnetic signals. Zhao et al. could demonstrate a stimulation of the VEGF receptor signaling pathway by applying an electric field on vascular endothelial cells [28]. Another study demonstrated an increased type I collagen expression in fibroblasts after exposure to pulsing electric fields [29]. Zhao et al. summarized that electric fields polarize the activation of multiple signalling pathways, including the PI3 kinases/Pten, membrane growth factor receptors and integrins, both key players in the wound healing processes [30].

However, the effect of low-frequency PEMF emitted by the Somagen™ device on fibroblasts as key players in wound healing remains to be investigated. Therefore, this study focuses on the effects of PEMF on the healing process of tendon fibroblasts in an in vitro wound healing model. Our findings may be helpful in the field of ligament tissue engineering and may support the development of new strategies for ligament repair.

Methods

Cell culture

Fibroblasts were isolated from five patients undergoing surgical treatment of the knee joint. The study protocol is in accordance with the standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. Following approval by the ethical committee of Hannover Medical School, written informed consent was obtained from the patients. The specimens of approximately 4 × 2 mm were aseptically collected from the patellar tendon. The obtained patellar tendon specimen was divided into 0.5 mm2 pieces and transferred into petri dishes with a roughened bottom. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) was used as culture medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 1% gentamicin and 1% amphotericin B (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). Tissue specimens were cultured in a humidified environment with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Medium was replenished every second day. After six to eight days, fibroblasts started to grow out of the patellar tendon specimens. After another three to four weeks, the cells reached 80 to 90% confluence. The cells were trypsinized and subcultured in 75 cm2 flasks (13 × 103 cells/cm2). Concomitantly, they were counted and an overall viability of more than 90% was observed using the trypan blue exclusion test. This procedure was repeated once. Cells in the second passage were harvested and 1.5 × 105 fibroblasts were transferred into six-well tissue culture plates (Corning, Vienna, Austria).

Induction of the scrape wound

Scrape wounds were performed in confluent monolayer cultures of the patellar tendon fibroblasts. A 1.5 cm wide, linear scrape was introduced with a cell scraper over the entire diameter of the well. The wound area was marked with three black ink dots on each side of the wound for reference. Cultures were rinsed with culture medium to remove floating cellular debris, and fresh culture medium was added.

Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields treatment protocol

Cell cultures were treated every second day, three times in total, with a registered and certified Somagen™ device, according to company’s protocol (Sachtleben GmbH, Hamburg) In this work, a specific “wound healing” program was used. The applied program consisted of two PEMF signal packages of 10 minutes at a fundamental frequency of 33 Hz and 20 minutes at 7.8 Hz. This ‘wound healing’ program was developed by Sachtleben GmbH in cooperation with different dermatology clinics and has been successfully used before in a clinical setting [31]. The signals have the shape of spike pulses with varying send/pause intervals. Thereby, a magnetic flux density of 0.25 μT up to 3.16 μT emerged. At a 5-mm distance from the applicator, electric field strength up to 6.3 mV/cm was measurable (Additional file 1). Applicators attached to the Somagen™ device were placed in the incubator. The six-well tissue culture dishes were put directly on top of the applicators, thereby having a distance to the fibroblast monolayer of approximately 1 to 2 mm. Control cells were also put on the applicator without starting the program and were cultivated in a separate incubator to avoid interactions between the stimulated and nonstimulated cells.

In order to measure any deviation between the treated versus the control cell cultures, time to closure of the gap, proliferation and apoptosis were determined.

Time to closure

The wound was microscopically examined daily for repopulation of the wound area (Figure 2A). The end point of observation was the complete bridging of the scrape wound. Therefore, before the scratch was initiated, a photograph as control with a 20× magnification was captured with the microscope (Zeiss). Afterwards, a photograph with the same magnification was made every day. For quantification, the free area was highlighted, calculated and compared to the control with the software ImageJ 1.42q (National Institute of Health, Maryland, USA). Three independent calculations of each donor were made.
Figure 2

The use of low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) lead to a significantly lower time to closure. Scrape wound of patellar tendon fibroblasts caused by a cell scraper (A), magnification 60×. For the analysis of the time to closure, one part of the cells was treated with the Somagen™ device applying the ‘wound healing’ program (B). Nontreated cells were cultured under the same conditions without treatment with the Somagen™ device. Mean ± SD, ***P <0.001, (N = 5, n = 2) are indicated.

Proliferation

The analysis of cell proliferation was performed one week after induction of the scrape wound using a standard BrdU kit for spectrophotometry (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). BrdU is a thymidine analog that is incorporated into the DNA during the synthesis phase (S1) of the cell cycle. At 0, 6 and 12 hours after application of BrdU, the amount of inserted BrdU was analyzed according to a modified protocol for the larger dishes. To remove non-incorporated BrdU, cells were washed twice with DMEM. Washed cells were fixed with 70% ethanol in 0.5 M HCl at -20°C for 30 min and washed three more times with DMEM. Nucleases were added to the cells at 37°C for 30 min to increase the accessibility of the incorporated BrdU for detection by anti-BrdU Fab-fragment. This incubation was performed in a buffer containing 66 mM Tris, 0.66 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol to permeate the cells and disintegrate disulphide bonds. After washing the cells three times with DMEM, a mouse monoclonal Fab-fragment against BrdU conjugated with horse-radish peroxidase was added to the cells together with 10 mg/ml BSA in phosphate-buffered saline. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min and subsequently washed three times with DMEM. The bound conjugate was visualized using 1 mg/ml of the soluble chromogenic substrate 2,2'-Acinobis [3-ethylbenzthiazoline-sulfonic acid] (ABTS). The signal was increased by adding 1 mg/ml of ABTS-substrate enhancer. The optical density of each sample was measured at 405 nm and 490 nm.

Apoptosis rate

Analysis of apoptosis was performed one week after induction of the scrape wound according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Bender Med systems, Vienna, Austria). Briefly, adherent cells were detached from the cell culture dishes by carefully scratching with a cell scraper. The cells were centrifuged at 1500 × g and 4°C; afterwards, the pellet was carefully resuspended in 100 μl binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4; 140 mM NaCl; 5 mM CaCl2) and stained with 6 μl recombinant human annexin-V-FITC and 6 μl of propidium iodide for discrimination of living, apoptotic and necrotic cells (Bender Med Systems, Vienna, Austria). After incubation for 20 min at 4°C in darkness, the cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 100 μl binding buffer. Flow cytometry was carried out on a FACS-calibur (Becton-Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). The software Cellquest-pro V1.1 from Becton-Dickinson was used for data analysis.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in duplicates for each of the five patients. Furthermore, cells of each donor were divided into two groups: treated and nontreated. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Differences between the treated and nontreated patellar tendon fibroblasts were analyzed using Student’s t-test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characterization of the patellar tendon fibroblasts

Patellar tendon fibroblasts were used for cell culture. Characterization of the cells was carried out as described before [32].

Time to closure

A uniform 1.5-cm-wide scrape wound was observed in every well of the six-well tissue culture plates. The edges of the wounds were sharply delineated. Damaged cells were observed in the edges that still adhered to the bottom of the well. On the consecutive days, the wound area was occupied by fibroblasts. The mean time for bridging the gap in the nontreated cells was 5.05 ± 0.33 days (Figure 2B). Treatment with the specific ‘wound healing’ program emitted by Somagen™ device significantly accelerated the bridging time to 3.35 ± 0.38 days (P <0.001).

Apoptosis rate

The percentage of Annexin-V positive cells did not differ between the two groups (nontreated 38.5 ± 6.5% versus Somagen™ device-treated 38.7 ± 7.7%) as depicted in Figure 3A.
Figure 3

The low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) did not affect the apoptotic rate but significantly increased the proliferation. Apoptosis level in patellar tendon fibroblasts in the scrape wound after 1 week (B). Apoptosis was measured using Annexin V-FITC and PI staining by flow cytometry. Proliferation measured using BrdU incorporation into patellar tendon fibroblasts in the scrape wound after 1 week (A). One part of the cells was treated with the low-frequency PEMF generated by the Somagen™ device applying the ‘wound healing’ program. Nontreated cells served as negative control. Mean ± SD, ***P <0.001, (N = 5, n = 2) are indicated.

Proliferation

Proliferation was determined by BrdU incorporation. The obtained values are optical density values corrected for unspecific backgrounds (Figure 3B). Untreated cell cultures with scrape wounds showed a mean value of 0.70 ± 0.16. A significant increase was observed after application of the specific ‘wound healing’ program emitted by Somagen™ device (1.58 ± 0.24, P <0.001).

Discussion

We investigated that certain low-frequency PEMF sequences influence in vitro wound healing of patellar tendon fibroblasts possibly via increasing the proliferation rate. In a similar model of scrape wounding of human foreskin fibroblasts, the 0.8-mm-wide gap was closed within 36 hours due to a preassembled matrix-containing fibrinogen. Moreover, this accelerated closure of the gap was associated with an 8-fold increase in 3H-thymidine incorporation, indicating a high proliferation rate [10]. Rodemann et al., who treated skin fibroblasts with electromagnetic fields, could detect a significant increase of the collagen synthesis and the protein content [33]. The proliferation capacity of the cells probably plays a role in the secondary wound healing phase. As noted in similar models using intestinal epithelial cells or endothelial cells, the rate of cell proliferation, determined by BrdU incorporation, did not differ between migrating and stationary cells over the initial 24-h period [3436]. This indicates that early epithelial and endothelial restitution is independent of proliferation. After the migration phase that allows cells to go beyond the wound edges, cells have to proliferate in order to repopulate the wound area.

These processes are modulated by signal transduction pathways. The second messenger Ca2+ seems to be involved, as brief treatment with increased extracellular Ca2+ during scrape wounding accelerated wound area closure rates by 50% [37, 38]. In our study, the tendon fibroblasts display 30% better wound area closure rates by low-frequency PEMF treatment. The differences may be due to the different cell origin, namely skin fibroblasts in the literature and tendon fibroblasts in our study. Furthermore, the multi-functional signal transducer NF-κB was activated as soon as 30 minutes after scrape wounding [35]. Especially at the wound edges, the subunit p65 was found. Within 5 minutes after wounding, ERK activation was evident. Again, this activation was particularly prominent in cells residing at the scrape edge [9]. These signal transduction molecules are important during adaptation and healing processes of tendon fibroblasts. This has been observed using cyclic, longitudinal strain in patellar tendon fibroblasts. Fifteen minutes of strain elicit NF-κB binding to DNA and is associated with increased proliferation [39, 40]. c-fos and JNK are also activated [41]. Therefore, low-frequency PEMF may activate these signal transduction pathways.

These signal transduction pathways are not only involved in proliferation but also in apoptosis. In our model, 30 to 40% apoptosis of patellar tendon fibroblasts was observed. This is in concert with earlier observations using the same type of cells [41]. Treatment with the specific ‘wound healing’ low-frequency PEMF program did not result in any changes in apoptosis rates. Epithelial cells showed induction of apoptosis originating at the wound edges, but this apoptotic effect subsequently spread over a 24-hour period to encompass areas not originally damaged [42].

Our study included only five replicates; therefore, more studies are necessary to further investigate the positive effect of low-frequency PEMF in a larger cohort of samples. Additionally, in vivo studies should confirm these results in a whole organism with tendon pathology.

Nevertheless, the treatment with low-frequency PEMF enhances the wound healing potential of patellar tendon fibroblasts in vitro. The incidence of tendon and ligament injuries grows due to the increasingly sports-oriented society. Treatment of such injuries is still a challenge to orthopedic trauma surgeons as a restitutio ad integrim can hardly be achieved. Therefore, new modes of treatment are investigated to improve the outcome of such pathologies. Low-frequency PEMF seems to have no adverse effects when applied in the human situation [31]. Furthermore, it is non-invasive, easy to handle, and has a short application time.

Conclusions

These results may be extrapolated to wound-healing phenomena in other soft tissues, for example skin and muscle. Wound healing is a complex process involving many different cell types and coordinated signalling responses, but fibroblasts, as a part of this complexity, support the healing process and in our study show an improved wound area closure rate under the influence of low-frequency PEMF. Thus, low-frequency electromagnetic signals could be an interesting new treatment option for wound-healing processes in vivo by accelerating closure of the wounds. Based on the positive results, further in vivo studies using low-frequency PEMF generated by the Somagen™ device for modulating wound healing are planned.

Abbreviations

ABTS 2: 

2'-Acinobis [3-ethylbenzthiazoline-sulfonic acid]

BrdU: 

Bromodesoxyuridin

DMEM: 

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium

FITC: 

fluorescein isothiocyanate

OD: 

optical density

PEMF: 

pulsed electromagnetic fields.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would sincerely like to thank Sachtleben GmbH for providing the Somagen™ device for this project. We would also like to thank Fritz Seidl, M.A. Interpreting and Translating, for proofreading this paper.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Trauma Surgery, Experimental Trauma Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich
(2)
Sachtleben GmbH

References

  1. Khan KM, Scott A: Mechanotherapy: how physical therapists’ prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair. Br J Sports Med 2009, 43: 247–252.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Szczesny SE, Lee CS, Soslowsky LJ: Remodeling and repair of orthopedic tissue: role of mechanical loading and biologics. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2010, 39: 525–530.Google Scholar
  3. Bedi A, Kovacevic D, Fox AJ, Imhauser CW, Stasiak M, Packer J, Brophy RH, Deng XH, Rodeo SA: Effect of early and delayed mechanical loading on tendon-to-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92: 2387–2401.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Maganaris CN, Narici MV, Almekinders LC, Maffulli N: Biomechanics and pathophysiology of overuse tendon injuries: ideas on insertional tendinopathy. Sports Med 2004, 34: 1005–1017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Peltz CD, Dourte LM, Kuntz AF, Sarver JJ, Kim SY, Williams GR, Soslowsky LJ: The effect of postoperative passive motion on rotator cuff healing in a rat model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91: 2421–2429.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomopoulos S, Zampiakis E, Das R, Silva MJ, Gelberman RH: The effect of muscle loading on flexor tendon-to-bone healing in a canine model. J Orthop Res 2008, 26: 1611–1617.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schlegel TF, Faber KJ, Chen AL, Hawkins RJ: The effect of postoperative immobilization on the healing of radiofrequency heat probe modified tissue: assessment of tissue length, stiffness, and morphology. Orthopedics 2008, 31: 134.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Desai RA, Gao L, Raghavan S, Liu WF, Chen CS: Cell polarity triggered by cell-cell adhesion via E-cadherin. J Cell Sci 2009, 122: 905–911.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Providence KM, Higgins PJ: PAI-1 expression is required for epithelial cell migration in two distinct phases of in vitro wound repair. J Cell Physiol 2004, 200: 297–308.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rybarczyk BJ, Lawrence SO, Simpson-Haidaris PJ: Matrix-fibrinogen enhances wound closure by increasing both cell proliferation and migration. Blood 2003, 102: 4035–4043.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Omura Y: Transmission of molecular information through electro-magnetic waves with different frequencies and its application to non-invasive diagnosis of patients as well as detection from patient’s X-ray film of visible and not visible medical information: part I. Acupunct Electrother Res 1994, 19: 39–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hensel K, Mienkina MP, Schmitz G: Analysis of ultrasound fields in cell culture wells for in vitro ultrasound therapy experiments. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37: 2105–2115.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Edmonds DT: Larmor precession as a mechanism for the detection of static and alternating magnetic fields. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1993, 30: 3–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Muehsam DJ, Pilla AA: Lorentz approach to static magnetic field effects on bound-ion dynamics and binding kinetics: thermal noise considerations. Bioelectromagnetics 1996, 17: 89–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gartzke J, Lange K: Cellular target of weak magnetic fields: ionic conduction along actin filaments of microvilli. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002, 283: C1333-C1346.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tilla U, Timmela CR, Brocklehurstb B, Horea PJ: The influence of very small magnetic fields on radical recombination reactions in the limit of slow recombination. Chemical Physics Letters 1998, 298: 7–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. McLauchlan KA, Steiner UE: The spin-correlated radical pair as a reaction intermediate. Mol Phys 1991, 73: 241–263.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Timmela CR, Tilla U, Brocklehurstb B, Mclauchlana KA, Horea PJ: Effects of weak magnetic fields on free radical recombination reactions. Mol Phys 1991, 95: 71–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Funk RH, Monsees T, Ozkucur N: Electromagnetic effects - From cell biology to medicine. Prog Histochem Cytochem 2009, 43: 177–264.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ventura C, Maioli M, Asara Y, Santoni D, Mesirca P, Remondini D, Bersani F: Turning on stem cell cardiogenesis with extremely low frequency magnetic fields. FASEB J 2005, 19: 155–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tofani S, Barone D, Cintorino M, de Santi MM, Ferrara A, Orlassino R, Ossola P, Peroglio F, Rolfo K, Ronchetto F: Static and ELF magnetic fields induce tumor growth inhibition and apoptosis. Bioelectromagnetics 2001, 22: 419–428.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Takahashi K, Kaneko I, Date M, Fukada E: Effect of pulsing electromagnetic fields on DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in culture. Experientia 1986, 42: 185–186.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodman R, Henderson AS: Exposure of salivary gland cells to low-frequency electromagnetic fields alters polypeptide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988, 85: 3928–3932.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun WJ, Chiang H, Fu YT, Yu YN, Xie HY, Lu DY: Exposure to 50 hz electromagnetic fields induces the phosphorylation and activity of stress-activated protein kinase in cultured cells. Electro- and Magnetobiology 2001, 29: 415–423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Selvam R, Ganesan K, Narayana Raju KV, Gangadharan AC, Manohar BM, Puvanakrishnan R: Low frequency and low intensity pulsed electromagnetic field exerts its antiinflammatory effect through restoration of plasma membrane calcium ATPase activity. Life Sci 2007, 80: 2403–2410.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Paksy K, Thuróczy G, Forgács Z, Lázár P, Gaáti I: Influece of sinusoidal 50-hz magnetic field on cultured human ovarian granulosa cells. Electro- and Magnetobiology 2000, 19: 91–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sachtleben J: Basis of the Cell Information Therapy. In Report: Basis Of The Cell Information Therapy. Hamburg: Sachtleben GmbH; 2012:1–3.Google Scholar
  28. Zhao M, Bai H, Wang E, Forrester JV, McCaig CD: Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors. J Cell Sci 2004, 117: 397–405.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Chao PH, Lu HH, Hung CT, Nicoll SB, Bulinski JC: Effects of applied DC electric field on ligament fibroblast migration and wound healing. Connect Tissue Res 2007, 48: 188–197.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao M: Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20: 674–682.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Visan A: Efficacy and tolerance of cell information therapy (CIT) on wound healing processes free of transplants. Kosmetische Med 2007, 3: 112–117.Google Scholar
  32. Bosch U, Zeichen J, Skutek M, Albers I, van Griensven M, Gassler N: Effect of cyclical stretch on matrix synthesis of human patellar tendon cells. Unfallchirurg 2002, 105: 437–442.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodemann HP, Bayreuther K, Pfleiderer G: The differentiation of normal and transformed human fibroblasts in vitro is influenced by electromagnetic fields. Exp Cell Res 1989, 182: 610–621.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ciacci C, Lind SE, Podolsky DK: Transforming growth factor beta regulation of migration in wounded rat intestinal epithelial monolayers. Gastroenterology 1993, 105: 93–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Egan LJ, de Lecea A, Lehrman ED, Myhre GM, Eckmann L, Kagnoff MF: Nuclear factor-kappa B activation promotes restitution of wounded intestinal epithelial monolayers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003, 285: C1028-C1035.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Iizuka M, Konno S: Wound healing of intestinal epithelial cells. World J Gastroenterol 2011, 17: 2161–2171.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Milara J, Mata M, Serrano A, Peiro T, Morcillo EJ, Cortijo J: Extracellular calcium-sensing receptor mediates human bronchial epithelial wound repair. Biochem Pharmacol 2010, 80: 236–246.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Tran PO, Hinman LE, Unger GM, Sammak PJ: A wound-induced [Ca2+] i increase and its transcriptional activation of immediate early genes is important in the regulation of motility. Exp Cell Res 1999, 246: 319–326.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. van Griensven M, Zeichen J, Skutek M, Bosch U, Tachibana H: Die Aktivierung des Transkriptionsfaktors NF-kB und des Protoonkogens c-fos in humanen Fibroblasten nach zyklischer mechanischer Dehnung. In Tissue engineering in der Orthopädie: Neues zum Gewebeersatz im Muskel-Skelett-System. Edited by: Bruns J. Darmstadt: Steinkopf; 2003:164–173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeichen J, van Griensven M, Bosch U: The proliferative response of isolated human tendon fibroblasts to cyclic biaxial mechanical strain. Am J Sports Med 2000, 28: 888–892.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Skutek M, van Griensven M, Zeichen J, Brauer N, Bosch U: Cyclic mechanical stretching of human patellar tendon fibroblasts: activation of JNK and modulation of apoptosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003, 11: 122–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Firth JD, Putnins EE: Keratinocyte growth factor 1 inhibits wound edge epithelial cell apoptosis in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 2004, 122: 222–231.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Seeliger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement