Skip to main content

Table 2 The baseline characteristics of the included studies

From: Comparison of the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis

Author

Source

Type

NC

DAPT (months)

FU (months)

Age (BP/DP)

Male (BP/DP)

Diabetes (BP/DP) (%)

Type B2/C (BP/DP) (%)

Lesion length (mean ± SD)

Reference diameter (mean ± SD)

BP

DP

BP

DP

BP

DP

Chevalier [19]

EuroInterv 2007

BES

PES

120

6

9

65/63

69/66

18/26

56.47/68.57

11.35 ± 4.51

11.03 ± 4.75

2.70 ± 0.44

2.60 ± 0.57

Byrne [20]

Heart 2009

SES

SES

404

12

24

66.5/65

79.3/78.2

27.4/28.7

NA

13.9 ± 7.2

14.6 ± 7.0

2.74 ± 0.59

2.80 ± 0.52

Chevalier [21]

Circ Cardiovasc Intervent 2009

BES

PES

243

6

9

62.7/63.2

74.5/68.9

16.3/27.8

49.67/44.44

10.56

10.84

2.72

2.73

Stefanini [22]

Lancet 2011

BES

SES

1,707

12

48

64.6/64.5

75.0/74.6

26.0/22.5

NA

15.2 ± 11.7

14.4 ± 10.6

2.60 ± 0.61

2.71 ± 0.52

Byrne [23]

JACC 2011

SES

EESSES

2,603

6

36

66.7/66.8

77.8/75.9

28.2/29.6

72.8/72.1

14.8 ± 8.6

15.0 ± 8.8

2.79 ± 0.47

2.75 ± 0.51

Maamoun [24]

The Egyptian Heart Journal 2012

BES

SESPES

145

6

24

56.7/54.2

87.1/85.5

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Kadota [25]

CCI 2012

BES

SES

326

3

9

67.1/67.7

71.6/72.0

38.7/39.4

69.7/62.0

12.64 ± 5.52

12.82 ± 6.81

2.68 ± 0.57

2.68 ± 0.54

Xu [26]

EuroInterv 2012

SES

SES

300

12

24

56.6/56.7

66.7/72

22/20

47.0/41.7

17.74 ± 9.30

18.72 ± 9.98

NA

NA

Tan [27]

Chin J Clinicians 2012

BES

EES

50

12

24

62/63

70.0/73.3

20.0/23.3

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Ge [28]

JACC 2012

SES

SES

1,909

12

12

63.3/62.1

67.7/73.0

20.5/20.75

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Smits [29]

Lancet 2013

BES

EES

2,707

12

12

63/62.7

74.4/74.3

21.8/21.6

63.7/63.3

16.8 ± 9.8

17.7 ± 10.6

2.9 ± 0.5

2.9 ± 0.5

Zhang [30]

INT J CARDIOL 2013

SES

SES

662

12

24

65.9/67.5

68.5/69.2

27.73/32.26

66.34/69.51

24.77 ± 14.47

29.20 ± 16.6

3.13 ± 0.45

3.26 ± 2.40

Natsuaki [31]

JACC 2013

BES

EES

3,235

3

12

69.1/69.3

77/77

46/46

NA

19.5 ± 12.8

19.3 ± 13.1

2.62 ± 0.6

2.61 ± 0.57

Raungaard [32]

Lancet 2015

BES

ZES

2,999

12

12

65.8/65.7

76.2/75.8

17.6/18.0

63/70

15.0

16.0

3.0

3.2

Han [33]

JACC 2014

SES

SES

2,737

6

12

60.2/60.2

68/70

22.6/21.3

83.5/85.1

20.6 ± 12.3

21.2 ± 12.9

2.79 ± 0.47

2.79 ± 0.44

Pilgrim [34]

Lancet 2014

SES

EES

2,119

12

12

66.1/65.9

77.0/77.3

24.2/21.7

NA

25.91 ± 15.40

27.45 ± 16.77

3.05 ± 0.49

3.03 ± 0.49

  1. Notes: BP, bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stent; DP, durable polymer drug-eluting stent; NC, number of cases; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; FU, follow-up period; BES, biolimus-eluting stent; SES, sirolimus-eluting stent; PES, paclitaxel-eluting stent; EES, everolimus-eluting stent; ZES, zotarolimus-eluting stent; NA, not available. Mean ± SD, the mean lesion length ± the standard deviation of this length.