Skip to main content

Nanopore sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid of three patients with cryptococcal meningitis

Abstract

Background

Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) has a high morbidity and mortality due to the low detection of Cryptococcus in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the early stage of the disease with traditional methods.

Case presentation

In addition to the traditional methods of India ink staining and cryptococcal antigen (CrAg), we used nanopore sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect pathogenic DNA in CSF samples of three patients with CM. The CSF samples of all three patients were positive by India ink staining and CrAg. NGS also detected Cryptococcus in all three CSF samples. Nanopore sequencing detected Cryptococcus in two CSF samples.

Conclusion

Nanopore sequencing may be useful in assisting with the clinical diagnosis of CM. Further research is needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of nanopore sequencing of CSF.

Background

Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is an opportunistic infectious disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with high morbidity and mortality [1]. CM shows nonspecific symptoms, such as headache, fever, vomiting, seizures, and focal neurological deficits [2, 3]. With an increase in the number of immunocompromised patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), cirrhosis and malignancies, CM has become a public health hazard [1,2,3,4,5]. However, CM culture is either time-consuming or lacks sensitivity, while the detection of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) can produce false negative results [3, 4]. Therefore, a fast and highly efficient method of diagnosis is needed.

Molecular biological methods can detect and identify pathogens rapidly and accurately without requiring culture. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used in the clinical diagnosis of microbes but is limited by DNA fragment quantity. Therefore, metagenomic sequencing was used. The pathogen-positive rate of next-generation sequencing (NGS) was 28.34% in the CSF of patients with CNS infections [5,6,7,8]. In addition, Cryptococcus has a large genome. As a result, NGS has poor specificity in the detection of Cryptococcus, since it can only produce short reads with satisfactory sensitivity. In contrast, nanopore sequencing has the ability to generate long reads and real-time sequencing. Therefore, nanopore sequencing has better specificity than NGS [10, 11, 13,14,15,16,17]. However, the clinical application of nanopore sequencing is currently limited and further study is needed.

Case presentation

Patients

This study was conducted in the People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The CSF samples were collected from three patients who provided signed informed consent and stored at − 80 °C from three patients who provided signed informed consent. The samples were only used for this study.

DNA sequencing

NGS

DNA was extracted from the samples with the TIANamp micro DNA kit (DP316, TIANGEN BIOTECH) and sonicated to a size of 150 bp. The DNA libraries were constructed through end repair, adapter ligation, PCR amplification, and sequencing on the BGISEQ-50/MGISEQ-2000 platform. High-quality sequencing data were generated by removing short (< 35 bp), low-quality and human sequence data. The remaining data were aligned to four microbial genome databases.

Nanopore sequencing

DNA was extracted by a QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN 51,304, Valencia, CA, USA). The DNA libraries were constructed using a rapid PCR barcoding kit (SQK-RPB004) and sequenced on Flow Cell R9.4 or R9.5 of a MinION platform. The sequencing data were base-called in fast5 files and demultiplexed in fastq files. After removing the short and low-quality reads, the reads were aligned with the microorganism genome database. Species with identified reads higher than two for ONT data were reported.

Clinical findings

The study included one male and two female patients, whose ages were 27, 32 and 60 years, respectively. One patient was exposed to pigeons before the onset of symptoms. All patients presented with headache, fever and stiff neck after infection. One patient experienced a seizure, while another patient had decreased level of consciousness. Medical imaging showed invasion of the meninges. CSF tests revealed elevated intracranial pressure (345–400 mmHg) and increased white blood cell (WBC) counts (1–343 × 106/L). All three patients were positive by CSF India ink staining and CSF CrAg detection but negative by CSF culture (Tables 1 and 2). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed increased meningeal enhancement in all three cases (Fig. 1).

Table 1 Clinical presentation of the three cases
Table 2 Laboratory test results of the three cases
Fig. 1.
figure 1

1a and 1b are the axial enhanced T1WI of case I. 2a and 2b are the axial enhanced T1WI of case II. 3a and 3b are the axial enhanced T1WI of case III. The MRI showed increased meningeal enhancement in all three cases

Nanopore sequencing detected Cryptococcus in two CSF samples (I and II) and NGS detected Cryptococcus in all three CSF samples. Nanopore sequencing produced 17,566 reads and 14,366 reads that were aligned to C. neoformans. NGS yielded 1, 17,394 and 97,979 reads that were aligned to C. neoformans.

Treatment

All three patients were treated with amphotericin B, flucytosine and fluconazole for 31–46 days, and the symptoms gradually improved. Thereafter, the patients were discharged and continued 12 weeks of outpatient follow-up. The symptoms of headache and fever gradually disappeared, and the haemogram returned to normal.

Conclusions and discussion

CM is caused by inhalation of Cryptococcus from soil, pigeon droppings and rotting vegetation [1,2,3]. CSF culture is the gold standard in the diagnosis of CM but is time-consuming and has a low positive rate. The India ink staining results are variable and dependent on the technician [2, 4]. The detection of CrAg always shows false negative results due to the frontal zone phenomenon [2,3,4]. Genetic testing has been increasingly used as a fast and highly efficient method to diagnose CM. Nanopore sequencing, a molecular biology method, is fast and can generate pathogen sequence information, such as drug resistance, to guide management [10, 11, 13,14,15,16,17].

In this study, three patients were clinically confirmed to have CM by positive detection using CSF culture and India ink staining. Nanopore sequencing detected Cryptococcus in two CSF samples and NGS detected Cryptococcus in all three CSF samples. Nanopore sequencing produced 17,566 reads and 14,366 reads that were aligned to C. neoformans, while NGS yielded 1,17,394 and 97,979 reads that were aligned to C. neoformans. The reads produced by nanopore sequencing were much longer than those produced by NGS. Thus, nanopore sequencing can sequence repetitive regions and structural variants, and provide comprehensive genomic information, such as the phenotype of antimicrobial resistance-encoding genes to help clinicians optimize the selection of antifungal agents for treatment (11, 12, 14, 18, 19).

This study was limited by the small sample size, and it is uncertain whether nanopore sequencing can increase the positive rate of pathogen detection. Therefore, further studies are needed.

Nanopore sequencing with improvements in accuracy could change the diagnosis of infection in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CM:

Cryptococcal meningitis

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

CNS:

Central nervous system

CrAg:

Cryptococcal antigen

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

WBC:

White blood cell

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Poplin V, Boulware DR, Bahr NC. Methods for rapid diagnosis of meningitis etiology in adults. Biomark Med. 2020;14:459–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Makadzange Azure T, McHugh G. New approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of cryptococcal meningitis. Semin Neurol. 2014;34:47–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Park Benjamin J, Wannemuehler Kathleen A, Marston Barbara J, et al. Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 2009;23:525–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Góralska K, Blaszkowska J, Dzikowiec M. Neuroinfections caused by fungi. Infection. 2018;46:443–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tenforde MW, Muthoga C, Callaghan A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of reflex laboratory-based cryptococcal antigen screening for the prevention and treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in Botswana. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanu S, Mi M, Rajeev S, et al. Neurological worsening during treatment of an immunocompetent adult with Cryptococcus neoformans meningitis. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2020;27:48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xing XW, Zhang JT, Ma YB, et al. Apparent performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis: a descriptive study.J. Med Microbiol. 2019;68:1204–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beardsley J, Sorrell TC, Chen SCA. Central Nervous System Cryptococcal infections in non-HIV infected patients. J Fungi (Basel). 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof5030071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trotter Alexander J, Alp A, Strinden Michael J, et al. Recent and emerging technologies for the rapid diagnosis of infection and antimicrobial resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;51:39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cozzuto L, Liu H, Pryszcz LP, et al. MasterOfPores: a workflow for the analysis of oxford nanopore direct RNA sequencing datasets. Front Genet. 2020;11:211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwak W, Han YH, Seol D, et al. Complete genome of Lactobacillus iners KY using Flongle provides insight into the genetic background of optimal adaption to vaginal econiche. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spealman P, Burrell J, Gresham D. Inverted duplicate DNA sequences increase translocation rates through sequencing nanopores resulting in reduced base calling accuracy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:4940–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gargis AS, Cherney B, Conley AB, et al. Rapid detection of genetic engineering, structural variation, and antimicrobial resistance markers in bacterial biothreat pathogens by nanopore sequencing. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kono N, Arakawa K. Nanopore sequencing: review of potential applications in functional genomics. Dev Growth Differ. 2019;61:316–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oude MBB, Kik M, de Bruijn ND, et al. Towards high quality real-time whole genome sequencing during outbreaks using Usutu virus as example. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;73:49–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li CH, Chng KR, Boey EJH, et al. INC-Seq: accurate single molecule reads using nanopore sequencing. Gigascience. 2016;5:34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheunert A, Dorfner M, Lingl T, et al. Can we use it? On the utility of de novo and reference-based assembly of Nanopore data for plant plastome sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0226234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, et al. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom. 2017;3: e000132.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong NTT, Nghia HDT, Thanh TT, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid MinION sequencing of 16S rRNA gene for rapid and accurate diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. J Infect. 2020;80:469–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KJ and XW conceived of and designed the study. LQ,YJ, KZ, MZ, TZ, MZ, WM, LJ, YT, SD, WL led on and conducted the clinical trial, enrolling patients, and collecting the clinical data. KJ and XW interpreted the data and wrote the paper, with input from all authors. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

(a) The patient’s written consent was obtained. (b) The design of the work has been approved by the ethical committees of the Henan Provincial People’s Hospital.

Consent for publication

All presentations of case reports have consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, K., Wang, X., Qin, L. et al. Nanopore sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid of three patients with cryptococcal meningitis. Eur J Med Res 27, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00625-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00625-4

Keywords

  • Nanopore sequencing
  • Next-generation sequencing
  • Cerebrospinal fluid
  • Cryptococcal meningitis