Skip to main content
Download PDF

Systemic immune inflammation index and system inflammation response index are potential biomarkers of atrial fibrillation among the patients presenting with ischemic stroke

European Journal of Medical Research volume 27, Article number: 106 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic inflammatory disorders in atrial fibrillation (AF) contribute to the onset of ischemic stroke. Systemic immune inflammation index (SIII) and system inflammation response index (SIRI) are the two novel and convenient measurements that are positively associated with body inflammation. However, little is known regarding the association between SIII/SIRI with the presence of AF among the patients with ischemic stroke.

Methods

A total of 526 ischemic stroke patients (173 with AF and 353 without AF) were consecutively enrolled in our study from January 2017 to June 2019. SIII and SIRI were measured in both groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the potential association between SIII/SIRI and the presence of AF. Finally, the correlation between hospitalization expenses, changes in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and SIII/SIRI values were measured.

Results

In patients with ischemic stroke, SIII and SIRI values were significantly higher in AF patients than in non-AF patients (all p < 0.001). Moreover, with increasing quartiles of SIII and SIRI in all patients, the proportion of patients with AF was higher than that of non-AF patients gradually. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that log-transformed SIII and log-transformed SIRI were independently associated with the presence of AF in patients with ischemic stroke (log-transformed SIII: odds ratio [OR]: 1.047, 95% confidence interval CI = 0.322–1.105, p = 0.047; log-transformed SIRI: OR: 6.197, 95% CI = 2.196–17.484, p = 0.001). Finally, a positive correlation between hospitalization expenses, changes in the NIHSS scores and SIII/SIRI were found, which were more significant in patients with AF (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study suggests SIII and SIRI are convenient and effective measurements for predicting the presence of AF in patients with ischemic stroke. Moreover, they were correlated with increased financial burden and poor short-term prognosis in AF patients presenting with ischemic stroke.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common type of arrhythmia, affects 14% of the adult population and is largely diagnosed in the elderly [1]. AF-related stroke accounts for more than 79% of all cardiogenic strokes, and its risk increases with a higher AF burden [2]. Furthermore, AF-related stroke usually results in worse outcomes and greater expenses than non-AF stroke [3]. Thus, monitoring the cardiac rhythm of stroke patients is an important strategy in clinical practice [4]. Traditionally, the cost of multiple cardiac rhythm investigations increases substantially when traditional detection methods of AF in stroke patients fails, doubling from 5.3% to 10.9% [5]. In recent years, biomarkers, which can predict AF in ischemic stroke patients, have been developed and investigated. Inflammatory activity has been shown to be related to AF and its complications [6]. Certain inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6, have shown that a strong relationship exists between AF burden and poor sinus rhythm maintenance [7, 8]. However, inflammatory biomarkers for assessing AF-related stroke have not been studied in detail.

Inflammatory activity can be evaluated by a series of haematological indices derived from white blood cells (WBC) and its elements. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios have demonstrated an enhanced predictive potential in the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and related mortality [9,10,11].

Recently, two novel inflammatory markers, systemic immune inflammation index (SIII) and system inflammation response index (SIRI), were able to provide additional information in the risk assessment of CVDs [12]. This study aimed to further determine the associations between SIII and SIRI with AF among the stroke patients.

Methods

Study design

Study population

This study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2019. We collected information on 826 eligible hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, computed tomography, transthoracic echocardiography, electrocardiography (ECG), and Holter were carried out to elucidate stroke mechanisms. Based on these results, patients were classified using the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria into cardioembolism, atherosclerosis, lacunar, and other determined and undetermined causes. AF-related stroke was defined as stroke in patients with either a history of AF or clinical evidence of AF based on ECG/24-h Holter monitoring during hospitalization [13]. The exclusion criteria were presence of malignant tumours and haematological, autoimmune, inflammation-related or chronic liver/kidney diseases. Finally, 526 patients with complete clinical data were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of patient enrolment in our study. AF, atrial fibrillation

Full size image

Clinical and biochemical assessments

Blood samples were obtained from all patients during hospitalization after fasting for at least 12 h. Levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) were assessed using a HITACHI 912 analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). Routine blood tests, including platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts, were performed using a full blood count analyser (Sysmex XT-1800i, Sysmex Corporation).

Detailed information about the patients’ medical histories (hypertension, diabetes and coronary artery disease) and lifestyles (smoking) were obtained using a standard questionnaire. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission (pre-NIHSS) and discharge (discharge-NIHSS) were recorded to assess neurological function. The financial burden was evaluated based on the cost of hospitalization per day and the total charges upon discharge.

Echocardiography was performed during hospitalization by trained sonologists. Meanwhile, information regarding the infarcted and ischemic areas of the brain was analysed by experienced radiologists.

SIII and SIRI measurement

SIII was calculated as follows: peripheral platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count. SIRI was calculated as follows: neutrophil count × monocyte count/lymphocyte count.

Statistical analysis

For baseline characteristics, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test the normality of the distribution. Continuous variables of normal distribution are expressed as ± standard deviation, and differences among groups were analysed by the Student’s t test or one-way analysis of variance. Medians (Q1, Q3) are summarized for non-normally distributed variables. Logarithmic transformations were calculated for the non-normally distributed continuous variables (SIII and SIRI). Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate logarithmic transformations of SIII and SIRI between two groups while considering age, sex, history of hypertension, diabetes, and history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) as covariates. Logistic regression models were used to analyse the potential association of SIII and SIRI with the presence of AF when age, sex, history of history of hypertension, diabetes and history of stroke/TIA were considered. Correlations between variables were analysed using Pearson's correlation test. Parameters associated with SIII and SIRI were identified using multivariate linear regression analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed P < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the studied population

A total of 173 AF-related stroke and 353 non-AF related stroke patients, respectively, were analysed in our study (Table 1). Compared to non-AF patients, AF patients were younger and had a lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus and cigarette use. Moreover, there was a lower proportion of male patients among those with AF. In our study, the patients who were diagnosed with AF-related cardiogenic stroke did not suffer from rheumatic valve diseases, left ventricular thrombus, or congenital heart disease. Among non-AF patients, atherosclerosis was the most frequent stroke subtype (n = 222, 62.8%) followed by small vessel disease (n = 127, 35.9%), while other causes accounted for 1.1% (n = 4). The distribution of the infarcted area also suggested a significant difference between the two groups. A larger left atrium diameter was observed in AF patients, which indicated more serious left atrial remodelling. In addition, the CHA2DS2–VASc score of the AF group was 4.90 ± 1.37.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)-related and non-AF-related stroke
Full size table

Among the patients with a history of ischemic stroke in both groups, AF patients suffered more significant neurological deficits than non-AF patients (NIHSS scores at discharge:,4 (2, 8) vs. 2 (0, 5), P < 0.001).TC, TG and LDL-C levels were lower, whereas HDL-C levels were higher, in AF patients than in non-AF patients. Considering the total WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts, AF patients demonstrated lower levels than non-AF patients. The platelet count was elevated in AF patients, and both SIII and SIRI was significantly higher in AF patients than in non-AF patients (SIII: 562.50 [379.73, 1,040.33] vs. 802.29 [473.08, 1,390.30], P < 0.001; SIRI: 1.28 [0.78, 2.12] vs. 2.05 [1.17, 4.02], P < 0.001). Logarithmic transformations were calculated for the non-normally distributed continuous variables (SIII and SIRI). We found that the difference in log-transformed SIII and SIRI were still significant even when sex, age, hypertension, and diabetes were added as covariates (all P < 0.001). Meanwhile, we observed that the median high sensitive C-reactive protein level at baseline was marginally higher in AF patients than in non-AF patients (3.3 [1.0, 5.9] vs. 2.7 [0.9, 5.4] mg/L, P = 0.057).

SIII and SIRI values in AF and non-AF patients

We further described the variation in the characteristics of the proportion of each subgroup in the quartiles of SIII and SIRI in all patients (Fig. 2A, B). In both quartiles 1 and 2, the proportion of AF patients was lower than that of non-AF patients (SIII: [Q1] 19.85% vs. 29.75%; SIRI: [Q1] 17.34% vs. 28.61%; SIII: [Q2] 19.65% vs. 27.76%; SIRI: [Q2] 22.54% vs. 26.35%). However, we observed an upward trend in the proportion of AF patients with increasing quartiles of SIII and SIRI, which was contrary to that in non-AF patients. Hence, in both quartiles 3 and 4, the proportion of AF patients was higher than that of non-AF patients (SIII: [Q3] 26.59% vs. 24.36%; SIRI: [Q3] 30.64% vs. 26.38%; SIII: [Q4] 38.72% vs. 18.13%; SIRI: [Q4] 29.48% vs. 22.66%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of proportions in atrial fibrillation (AF) and non-AF subgroups among different quartiles of the systemic immune inflammation index (SIII) (A) and system inflammation response index (SIRI) (B) in patients with stroke

Full size image

Multivariate linear regression and logistic regression analysis for SIII and SIRI

Results of multivariate linear regression analysis with age, male sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of stroke/TIA and AF as covariates are presented in Tables 2 and 3. In addition to age, AF was independently associated with elevated log-transformed SIII (P = 0.026) and log-transformed SIRI (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that log-transformed SIII and log-transformed SIRI were independently associated with an increased risk of AF in patients with stroke. (log-transformed SIII: OR: 1.047, 95% CI = 0.322–1.105, P = 0.047; log-transformed SIRI: OR: 6.197, 95% CI = 2.196–17.484, P = 0.001, Table 4).

Table 2 Multivariate linear regression analysis for log systemic immune inflammation index (SIII)
Full size table
Table 3 Multivariate linear regression analysis for log system inflammation response index (SIRI)
Full size table
Table 4 Logistic regression analysis for log systemic immune inflammation index (SIII) and log system inflammation response index (SIRI) in patients with and without atrial fibrillation (AF)
Full size table

Correlation between financial burden/changes in NIHSS Scores and SIII/SIRI

Compared with non-AF related ischemic stroke, AF-related stroke resulted in a higher disability and mortality rate, which led to greater financial burden to society [14]. Then we determined the potential of SIII and SIRI for evaluating the financial burden of AF in the patients with stroke. In our study, the daily expenses of AF-related stroke patients were significantly higher than that non-AF stroke patients (1885.50 ± 614.43 vs. 1631.37 ± 438.38 RMB, P < 0.001). Moreover, as shown in Fig. 3A, B, we found that the daily expenses during hospitalization correlated significantly with log-transformed SIII and SIRI. Moreover, AF-related stroke patients exhibited a larger correlation coefficient compared with non-AF stroke patients (SIII: r = 0.370, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.021, p = 0.003; SIRI: r = 0.257, p = 0.002 vs. r = 0.018, p = 0.028).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between costs and systemic immune inflammation index (SIII) (or system inflammation response index [SIRI]). SIII and SIRI were logarithmically transformed before plotting. Hollow circles and dotted lines, non-atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (n = 353); Filled circles and solid lines, patients with AF (n = 173)

Full size image

Although the proportion of AF patients with stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis/interventional therapy was higher than that of non-AF stroke patients, AF patients had higher NIHSS scores on admission and discharge (all P < 0.05). We also observed that changes in the NIHSS scores of AF patients had a larger correlation coefficient with the log-transformed SIII and SIRI than non-AF patients (SIII: r = 0.278, P = 0.006 vs. r = 0.155, P = 0.007; SIRI: r = 0.187, P = 0.046 vs. r = 0.124, P = 0.033) (Fig. 4A, B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlation between change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and systemic immune inflammation index (SIII) (or system inflammation response index [SIRI]). SIII and SIRI were logarithmically transformed before plotting. Hollow circles and dotted lines, non-atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (n = 353); Filled circles and solid lines, patients with AF (n = 173)

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association between SIII, SIRI and AF-related stroke. The results demonstrated that SIII and SIRI values were significantly higher in AF group than in non-AF group among the stroke patients. Meanwhile, SIRI and SIII were both independently associated with the presence of AF in patients with ischemic stroke. Moreover, the positive correlation between SIII, SIRI, hospitalization expenses and changes in NIHSS scores were enhanced in AF patients than in non-AF patients in the patients with ischemic stroke.

Regardless of the type of stroke, the immune response to acute cerebral ischemia is a major factor in stroke pathobiology and prognosis [15]. Patients with AF demonstrate a phenomenon of systemic inflammation, which will exacerbate the inflammatory injury of stroke [16]. Moreover, there is plausible evidence linking inflammation to the initiation of AF-related thrombosis. Endothelial activation/damage, increased platelet activation and increased fibrinogen expression contribute to AF-related stroke [17]. Thus, the identification of sensitive and specific inflammatory biomarkers for AF among the stroke patients further guides individualized therapy and achieves the goal of precision medicine [18]. SIII and SIRI can reflect the systemic inflammatory activity of the body, and they have great potential in predicting the prognosis of cancer patients [19,20,21]. Higher monocyte and neutrophil counts and lower lymphocyte counts have been associated with a higher CVD risk [22,23,24]. Based on previous research, SIII and SIRI have been proven to be related to the risk of CVDs and all-cause death. More importantly, higher SIII and SIRI values correlated with an increased risk of stroke, stroke subtypes (ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke) and all-cause death [12]. However, whether the absence and presence of AF influences the level of SIII and SIRI in ischemic stroke merits further investigation.

A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is more closely related to new-onset AF and recurrence after AF ablation [25]. Elevated monocyte counts also result in the development of atrial remodelling [26]. Although WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts were significantly lower in AF-related stroke patients than in non-AF stroke patients in our study, AF patients had higher SIRI and SIII, which demonstrated that the onset of AF-related stroke is a systemic inflammatory process. Cerebrovascular occlusion initiates a local inflammatory immune response and post-stroke immunosuppression [27]. The absolute value of the WBC count could suggest that post-stroke immunosuppression is more significant in patients with AF. In addition, there is excess platelet activation and increased platelet aggregation in patients with AF, which was deduced by higher levels of CD62P, CD63 and sP-selectin [28]. Platelet disorder is associated with an inflammatory response [29]. In addition, the higher SIRI/SIII values in AF patients could also confirm previous findings.

Our data revealed that SIRI and SIII were both independently associated with the presence of AF in patients with stroke. Changes in NIHSS scores can be used to assess the improvement of neurological function in stroke patients. The positive correlation between the change in NIHSS scores and SIII /SIRI was markedly enhanced in patients with AF-related stroke comparing with patients with non-AF stroke. In addition, the positive correlation between hospitalization costs and SIII/ SIRI also reflected the same trend.

Screening of convenient and effective biomarkers associated with AF among the ischemic stroke patients was performed to determine the mechanisms and prognosis of AF [30]. Our data emphasized the role of inflammatory activity in the presence of AF in stroke patients.

Our study has several limitations. First, this study was a retrospective analysis based on prospectively collected data, and all enrolled patients were from a single centre. Second, the sample size in our study was modest; a large-scale prospective study is necessary to confirm our conclusions. Third, the SIII and SIRI were measured only once, which may not show dynamic changes during emergency admission. Dynamically monitoring the two indices may provide more information. Finally, the predictive ability of SIII and SIRI in the prognosis of different stroke subtypes is worth investigating.

In conclusion, this study indicated that elevated SIII and SIRI values are potential biomarkers of AF among the ischemic stroke patients.

Availability of data materials

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Rahman F, Kwan GF, Benjamin EJ. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(11):639–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pujadas Capmany R, Arboix A, Casañas-Muñoz R, Anguera-Ferrando N. Specific cardiac disorders in 402 consecutive patients with ischaemic cardioembolic stroke. Int J Cardiol. 2004;95(2–3):129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alkhouli M, Alqahtani F, Aljohani S, Alvi M, Holmes DR. Burden of atrial fibrillation-associated ischemic stroke in the United States. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(5):618–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaura A, Sztriha L, Chan FK, Aeron-Thomas J, Gall N, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Teo JT. Early prolonged ambulatory cardiac monitoring in stroke (EPACS): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Eur J Med Res. 2019;24(1):25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Seet RC, Friedman PA, Rabinstein AA. Prolonged rhythm monitoring for the detection of occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke of unknown cause. Circulation. 2011;124(4):477–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aviles RJ, Martin DO, Apperson-Hansen C, Houghtaling PL, Rautaharju P, Kronmal RA, Tracy RP, Van Wagoner DR, Psaty BM, Lauer MS, et al. Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;108(24):3006–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dernellis J, Panaretou M. Relationship between C-reactive protein concentrations during glucocorticoid therapy and recurrent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(13):1100–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smit MD, Maass AH, De Jong AM, Muller Kobold AC, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC. Role of inflammation in early atrial fibrillation recurrence. Europace. 2012;14(6):810–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tokgoz S, Kayrak M, Akpinar Z, Seyithanoğlu A, Güney F, Yürüten B. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(7):1169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaya H, Ertaş F, İslamoğlu Y, Kaya Z, Atılgan ZA, Çil H, Çalışkan A, Aydın M, Oylumlu M, Soydinç MS. Association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and severity of coronary artery disease. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014;20(1):50–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Horne BD, Anderson JL, John JM, Weaver A, Bair TL, Jensen KR, Renlund DG, Muhlestein JB. Which white blood cell subtypes predict increased cardiovascular risk? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(10):1638–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin Z, Wu Q, Chen S, Gao J, Li X, Zhang X, Zhou Y, He D, Cheng Z, Zhu Y, et al. The associations of two novel inflammation indexes, SII and SIRI with the risks for cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: a ten-year follow-up study in 85,154 individuals. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:131–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lip GYH, Brechin CM, Lane DA. The global burden of atrial fibrillation and stroke: a systematic review of the epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in regions outside North America and Europe. Chest. 2012;142(6):1489–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anrather J, Iadecola C. Inflammation and stroke: an overview. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13(4):661–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu YF, Chen YJ, Lin YJ, Chen SA. Inflammation and the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(4):230–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo Y, Lip GY, Apostolakis S. Inflammation in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(22):2263–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wijeratne T, Menon R, Sales C, Karimi L, Crewther S. Carotid artery stenosis and inflammatory biomarkers: the role of inflammation-induced immunological responses affecting the vascular systems. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(19):1276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geng Y, Zhu D, Wu C, Wu J, Wang Q, Li R, Jiang J, Wu C. A novel systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) for predicting postoperative survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;65:503–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xie QK, Chen P, Hu WM, Sun P, He WZ, Jiang C, Kong PF, Liu SS, Chen HT, Yang YZ, et al. The systemic immune-inflammation index is an independent predictor of survival for metastatic colorectal cancer and its association with the lymphocytic response to the tumor. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kubota K, Ito R, Narita N, Tanaka Y, Furudate K, Akiyama N, Chih CH, Komatsu S, Kobayashi W. Utility of prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune-inflammation index in oral cancer treatment. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sweetnam PM, Thomas HF, Yarnell JW, Baker IA, Elwood PC. Total and differential leukocyte counts as predictors of ischemic heart disease: the Caerphilly and Speedwell studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(5):416–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rana JS, Boekholdt SM, Ridker PM, Jukema JW, Luben R, Bingham SA, Day NE, Wareham NJ, Kastelein JJ, Khaw KT. Differential leucocyte count and the risk of future coronary artery disease in healthy men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study. J Intern Med. 2007;262(6):678–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wheeler JG, Mussolino ME, Gillum RF, Danesh J. Associations between differential leucocyte count and incident coronary heart disease: 1764 incident cases from seven prospective studies of 30,374 individuals. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(15):1287–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Z, Cui L, Ma J, Ma X, Li G. Association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:361–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shahid F, Lip GYH, Shantsila E. Role of monocytes in heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007849.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shim R, Wong CH. Ischemia, immunosuppression and infection-tackling the predicaments of post-stroke complications. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(1):64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choudhury A, Chung I, Blann AD, Lip GY. Platelet surface CD62P and CD63, mean platelet volume, and soluble/platelet P-selectin as indexes of platelet function in atrial fibrillation: a comparison of “healthy control subjects” and “disease control subjects” in sinus rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(19):1957–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayashi M, Takeshita K, Inden Y, Ishii H, Cheng XW, Yamamoto K, Murohara T. Platelet activation and induction of tissue factor in acute and chronic atrial fibrillation: involvement of mononuclear cell-platelet interaction. Thromb Res. 2011;128(6):e113-118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hijazi Z, Wallentin L, Lindbäck J, Alexander JH, Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, Ezekowitz MD, Granger CB, Lopes RD, Pol T, et al. Screening of multiple biomarkers associated with ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(24): e018984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC, NO.81871102 and 82172068), Municipal Science and Technology Commission Medical Innovation Project (20Y11910200), the14th undergraduate training program for innovation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University school of medicine(1420X003) to Dr. Dong Huang, the Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (No. YG2019ZDA10), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 21ZR1448100) and the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC, NO. 82170314) to Dr. Jing-bo Li and National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 81974028) to Dr. Yan-peng Wang.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Kai-bin Lin and Feng-hua Fan contributed equally

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heart Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Xuhui District, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Kai-bin Lin, Feng-hua Fan, Ming-qi Cai, Yin Yu, Zhi-feng Dong, Min-Jie Yuan, Shuai Li, Yan-peng Wang, Kan-kai Chen, Ji-ni Zhu, Xin-wei Guo, Xue Zhang, Jing-bo Li & Dong Huang

  2. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Kai-bin Lin

  3. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Feng-hua Fan

  4. School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Chuan-liang Fu, Lu-yue Ding & Yu-dong Sun

  5. School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Jia-wen Sun

  6. Zhiyuan College, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Yong-wang Shi

  7. Department of Neurology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Yu-wu Zhao

Authors
  1. Kai-bin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng-hua Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ming-qi Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yin Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chuan-liang Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lu-yue Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yu-dong Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jia-wen Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yong-wang Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhi-feng Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Min-Jie Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shuai Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yan-peng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kan-kai Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ji-ni Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Xin-wei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Xue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yu-wu Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Jing-bo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Dong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KB-L, FH-F, JB-L, and DH designed the study and wrote the manuscript. XZ, MQ-C, YY, CL-F, LY-D, YD-S, JW-S, YW-S, ZF-D, MJ-Y, S L, YP-W, KK-C, JN-Z, and XW-G contributed to sample collection. YW-Z supervised the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing-bo Li or Dong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

All participants have given consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Kb., Fan, Fh., Cai, Mq. et al. Systemic immune inflammation index and system inflammation response index are potential biomarkers of atrial fibrillation among the patients presenting with ischemic stroke. Eur J Med Res 27, 106 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00733-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00733-9

Keywords

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us