Skip to main content

A nomogram for predicting sclerotherapy response for treatment of lymphatic malformations in children



In this manuscript, we purposed to identify the prognostic factors for treatment of lymphatic malformations in children using polidocanol foam combined with pingyangmycin and to construct nomogram for predicting sclerotherapy response.


A retrospective analysis of 77 children having LMs who underwent sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam combined with pingyangmycin under ultrasound display from January 2017 to April 2020 was done. The clinical response was graded as excellent (≥ 90%), good (≥ 50%, < 90%), and poor (< 50%). More than 50% was considered as acceptable response. Prognostic factors were identified by Pearson’s Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and multivariable logistic regression model was used to construct a nomogram to predict sclerotherapy response. The discrimination and calibration of nomogram were verified through the receiver operating characteristic cure and calibration plots.


The mean number of treatment sessions was 3.1 (range, 1–6). Among 77 patients, 58 patients (75.3%) had excellent response to treatment (≥ 90%) and 68 patients (88.3%) had an acceptable response (≥ 50%, < 90%). Clinical disfigurement (P = 0.014), skin discoloration (P = 0.040), morphological subtype (P < 0.001) and extent of the lesion (P < 0.001) correlated with clinical response to sclerotherapy in LMs. Sclerotherapy response was predicted through nomogram constructed in this study, which shows good calibration and discrimination. Also, focal lesion and macrocystic or mixed morphological subtype lesion were seen more often in lower number of treatment sessions among the patients with excellent response.


An acceptable response to sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam combined with pingyangmycin was achieved in majority of LMs in children with extremely low complication rates. Nomogram based on the prognostic factors of sclerotherapy response for LMs in children was shown to possess an excellent performance to predict the probability of LMs sclerotherapy response.

What is known:

  • • A plenty of sclerosants had been proposed to sclerotherapy of lymphatic malformations in children.

  • • Microcystic lesions have worse outcomes compared with macrocystic or mixed lesions.

What is new:

  • • Polidocanol foam combined with pingyangmycin appears to be an effective and safe treatment for lymphatic malformations in children.

  • • Clinical disfigurement, skin discoloration, morphological subtype and extent of the lesion correlated with clinical response to sclerotherapy in lymphatic malformations in children.


The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomaly (ISSVA) classification is widely recognized and divides vascular abnormalities into vascular tumors and vascular malformations [1, 2]. The size of the malformation may increase, in contrast to vascular tumors which are characterized by spontaneous regression. Vascular malformations contain two subtype disorders: high-flow disorders (arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistula) and low-flow lesions (venous and lymphatic malformations). Lymphatic malformations (LMs) results from errors in the embryonic development of the lymphatic system and is estimated to occur in about 1 in 2000 live births, diagnosed mainly at birth or within 2 years of birth. LMs can occur in any part of the body, but 75% of LMs affect the head and neck region [3].

According to ISSVA classification, LMs are subdivided into macrocystic lesions (cysts > 2 cm), microcystic lesions (cysts < 2 cm) and mixed lesions [4]. Symptoms vary depending on the size, location and anatomy of the LMs involved. Small lesions may be asymptomatic until infection or bleeding develops, while complex lesions may be accompanied by pain, edema, deformation and even airway compression. Patients can suffer from mild swelling to life-threatening airway obstruction, macroglossia, impaired oral feeding, vision loss, overgrowth of the mandible, esthetic defects and pain, when lesion locate in the head and neck [5, 6].

The main aim of LMs management is to correct functional impairment and esthetic deformation. Prior to the development of minimally invasive methods, the primary means of treatment for LMs was surgery; whereas, it was correlated with a number of complications such as seroma, infection, hematoma/hemorrhage, nerve damage and scar deformity [7, 8]. Currently, there are a variety of treatment options include watchful waiting, medication (primarily sirolimus or sildenafil), sclerotherapy, laser/radiofrequency ablation, or a combination of the above [9,10,11]. Sclerotherapy is becoming the first-line treatment of choice for LMs due to relatively few complications and low recurrence rates.

Although LMs has widely treatment, a standardized grading scale to assess outcomes is still absence and there are a few research in this area. Serres et al. proposed a preoperative staging scale for LMs in 1995 to predict prognosis and outcome, but this scale only focused on surgical intervention based on lesion site [12]. And there are studies developing a consensus statement or radiologic grading system for evaluating the treatment of LMs [13, 14]. However, these studies mainly report the lesion on head and neck, and include both adults and children. Recently, one study investigated clinico-radiologic predictors to predict the clinical outcome, which evaluated on the sclerotherapy response in low-flow vascular malformations [15]. At present, driven by clinical needs, there is an urgent need to establish models to predict prognostic probability and guide targeted treatment strategy. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a quantitative prediction model to predict sclerotherapy response in LMs patients, so as to help clinicians make specific treatment recommendations for patients.

This study purposed to identify prognostic factors for sclerotherapy response of LMs in children. In addition, construction of a reliable and reproducible nomogram for clinical treatment outcomes of LMs, which offers the ability to both refine reporting standards and clarify communication between treating physicians.


Patient enrollment

From January 2017 to December 2019, 77 children diagnosed with LMs were recruited in the Department of Plastic Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital.

Inclusion criteria comprised: patients with LMs. According to ISSVA definition, physical examination, Doppler ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria included: LMs patients with a history of treatment; patients with severe systemic disease who cannot tolerate general anesthesia; patients are allergic to polidocanol or pingyangmycin.

This research was granted by the Institutional Review Committee of ethics Committee of Jiangxi Provincial Children’s Hospital, and all guardians signed informed consents. This study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sclerotherapy regimen

All patients experienced a complete clinical examination, Doppler ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. Preparation of 3% (60 mg) polidocanol (Aethoxysklerol; Kreussler Pharma, Wiesbaden, Germany), 8 mg pingyangmycin (Jilin Aodong Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Jilin, China). The sclerosing foam are directly injected in the field using a 1:3 liquid to gas ratio. Two syringes are connected by a three-way stopcock, one filled with polidocanol and one filled with air; the foam is made by mixing two syringes having multiple channels as stated by Tessari.

All operations were undergone in the operating room in general anesthesia condition, which could offer adequate compliance in pediatric patients. After proper sterilization, a single transfusion needle is inserted percutaneous using a double or multiple syringe system under ultrasound display. When the needle located in the cyst, the polidocanol (POL) foam and pingyangmycin was injected, respectively, after aspiration of an adequate amount of the lymphatic fluid. Applied local pressure to the injection site and observed carefully for 15 min. A compression pads should be used for the first 3 days. All patients were informed to follow-up or treatment followed 1 month later. Generally, one to three sessions comprised one treatment cycle, depending on the individual's response, the size of lesion. Until the lesion was dissolved and no lymphatic fluid was drained, the treatment cycle was considered finished. The maximum dose of pingyangmycin and polidocanol should not exceed 0.5 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg, respectively. After completion of treatment, patients were advised to review every 12 weeks.


Outcomes included response to treatment, number of treatment sessions, and complications of post-treatment. The post-treatment complications and number of treatment sessions were documented. The treatment response, which was based on clinical examination and imaging findings after each treatment, was classified into excellent response (completely cured, lesion reduction ≥ 90%), good response (significantly improved appearance, lesion reduction ≥ 50%, < 90%), and poor response (improved appearance, lesion reduction < 50%). And excellent and good response were defined as an acceptable response. All patients were followed up for an average of 16.5 months.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were displayed by means and standard deviation or median and range. And categorical data were described by number and percentage (N, %). Continuous data were analyzed by independent t test and categorical data were compared using Pearson’s Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. The statistically significant factors for therapeutic response were then used to constructed a multivariable logistic regression model. Based on the multivariable logistic regression model, a predictive nomogram for LMs response was developed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves were used to assess the efficacy. Statistically significant levels were two-tailed and set at P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 Windows software package. The nomogram and ROC curve were drawn using the “rms” package in R version 3.4.1.


Clinical features

A total of 77 patients (38 males and 39 females) were included; mean age: 3.3 ± 1.2 years (1 day to 18 years); direct intra-focal sclerotherapy was performed with polidocanol and pingyangmycin. The most commonly affected site was head and neck region (n = 35, 45%), followed by extremities (n = 17, 22%), thorax (n = 12,16%), and abdomen and pelvis location (n = 10, 13%). The spectrum of clinical symptoms included swelling (71% of patients), pain (39% of patients), disfigurement (55%), skin discoloration (53%), restricted range of motion (13%), and bleeding (42%). 15 patients (19%) were diffuse and involved two or more anatomic locations. In the morphological subtypes, macrocystic LMs (40%) were the most common patterns.

In this study, a total of 214 treatment sessions with sclerotherapy were performed in the 77 patients. The mean number of treatment sessions was 3.1, ranging from 1–6 sclerotherapy sessions per patient. 55% and 18% patients received one and two procedures during the treatment sessions, respectively. The average follow-up period was 18 (range, 6–30) months (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients

Clinical response

In patient-level evaluations, 58 patients responded excellent to treatment (group A), 10 responded good to treatment (group B), and 9 responded poor to treatment (group C) at the end of the study period. Thus, 75.3% of patients had an excellent response and 88.3% patients had an acceptable response. Disfigurement (P = 0.014), skin discoloration (P = 0.040), morphological subtype (P < 0.001) and extent of the lesion (P < 0.001) had significant influence on the clinical efficacy of each patient (Table 2). The clinical response was better in macrocystic and mixed lesions compared with microcystic lesions ((P < 0.001 and P = 0.046, respectively). And patients with diffuse lesion had a worse clinical response compared with local lesion. Absence of skin discoloration, disfigurement correlated with an excellent response.

Table 2 Excellent responders (group A vs groups B and C) with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics

Among the patient with excellent response, there was also a significant higher number of treatment sessions per patient in patients with microcystic lesion (median 4, range 3–6) over the study period compared with patients with macrocystic (median 1, range 1–6; P = 0.034) or mixed lesion (median 3, range 2–6; P = 0.042). Also, the patient with local lesion (median 1, range 1–3) had a significantly lower number of sessions compared with diffusion lesion (median 3, range 1–6; P = 0.026). But there was no significantly difference in skin disfigurement and discoloration in the number of sessions performed (Table 3).

Table 3 Sclerotherapy sessions (patient of excellent response) with respect to clinical characteristics

Nomogram construction

All significant factors for clinical response were integrated into the nomogram to predict the sclerotherapy response probability (Fig. 1a). As shown in Fig. 1b, the calibration curve shows that the predicted probability is in good agreement with the observed probability. In addition, the ROC curve showed good discrimination, with nomogram predicting a response AUC of 88.5% (95% CI 81.0–96.0%) (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A nomogram for predicting excellent response in two treatment circles (A), calibration curve (B), and ROC curve (C) for assessing the calibration and discrimination of the nomogram in predicting excellent response

Procedure-related complications

Regarding the safety of sclerotherapy with polidocanol and pingyangmycin, no serious complications were observed in this study. Fifty-four patients (77%) developed mild swelling after sclerotherapy, with a mean duration of swelling of 5.4 days (range 3–10). One child developed significant swelling after the injection, but the symptoms resolved within 2 weeks, with no signs of infection or other identifiable complications. Systemic complications: one child developed mild fever below 38.5 ℃ 3 days after sclerotherapy. In addition, one child developed gastrointestinal reactions and sleep disturbances, respectively. These minor complications resolved within 1 week without special treatment.


To our knowledge, there are sparse studies that have explored prognostic factors of sclerotherapy in LMs and a predictive nomogram prediction model is absence at present; meanwhile, most researches have focused on the efficacy of each sclerosing agents [16,17,18]. In addition, many studies only compared the efficacy of various sclerosants in children with LMs [19, 20]. However, researches mainly focused on the prognostic variables for LMs with sclerotherapy were relative sparse. In this study, we assessed therapeutic effect and investigated the prognostic factors for sclerotherapy response of LMs in children with a large number of samples. The nomogram constructed in our study will help predict the long-term response of LMs in children, and help clinicians make individualized treatment strategy and communicate the prognosis with their families.

Numerous sclerosing agents have been proposed over the years. In recent years, microfoam injections have become increasingly popular because of their unique properties and ease of management. Particularly, POL is a non-ionic surfactant sclerosing agent that directly damages vascular endothelial cells by activating cellular calcium signaling and nitric oxide pathways, thereby reducing malformation volume. POL foam replaces blood rather than diluting it, and tightly controls the concentration of agents in the blood vessels and distributes them evenly throughout the lumen.

POL foam sclerotherapy for vascular malformations has been well documented in previous studies.

One study demonstrated that POL foam could diminish the size of lesion in 24 vascular malformations patients [21]. Yamaki et al. found that sclerotherapy with POL foam was an effective and safe treatment in 32 patients with LMs [22]. The study showed that 88% of patients experienced excellent and moderate responses, while intralesional bleeding was observed in 13% of patients. In general, polidocanol is considered as a safe but relatively weaker potent sclerosant compared to other sclerosants. Moreover, one single sclerosing agent could not obtain excellent results in many patients.

Pingyangmycin is extracted from bleomycin (bleomycin A5) and is becoming one popular sclerosing agents [23]. Pingyangmycin and bleomycin contains similar chemical structure and composition and are common drugs to vascular malformations and a kind of tumors [24]. Pingyangmycin and bleomycin have similar curative effect, but it has less complication and low cost [25]. Plenty of studies found that pingyangmycin has an excellent therapeutic effect on deep microcystic LMs in the face and tongue [24, 26]. In the case of macrocystic LMs, one study showed that 84.38% of patients had a satisfactory final recovery in 32 participants who treated with injections of pingyangmycin [27]. Furthermore, Luo and Gan demonstrated that pingyangmycin was an effective and safe sclerosing agent in LMs [28]. According to the above studies, pingyangmycin was an ideal sclerosant to combine with POL foam to enhance therapeutic effect. In addition, pingyangmycin and polidocanol are a safer choice, because these two substances are stable in physical and chemical characteristics. Meanwhile, it has been reported that chemical reaction could not happen when them are mixed [29]. Thus, this study evaluated the therapeutic effect of polidocanol foam combined with pingyangmycin in LMs and developed a predictive nomogram for LMs response.

This large, retrospective study showed the effectiveness of sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam and pingyangmycin sclerosants in managing patients with LMs in children. Meanwhile, we found the skin discoloration, disfigurement, morphological subtype and extent of the lesion had significant influence on the clinical efficacy of each patient. We also found, among the patient with excellent response, morphological subtype and extent of the lesion had significant influence on the number of sessions performed per patient during the study period.

Identification of prognostic factors is of great significance to guide individualized treatment and improve treatment response. There are studies found that well-defined margin, female gender, macrocystic type and phlebographic characteristic were variables correlated with the therapeutic effect in patients with low-flow vascular malformations or LMs [15, 30, 31]. At the present study, we confirmed four prognostic factors for LMs patients with sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam and pingyangmycin, and the result was partly similar to the previous studies. LMs patients achieved a significantly better sclerotherapy response if they had the following characteristics: absence of skin discoloration, absence of disfigurement, macrocystic, and focal lesion. At present, few studies have focused on the prognostic variables for LMs with sclerotherapy. As reported in this study, disfigurement was a factor associated with LMs efficacy. The patients without of disfigurement were significantly better than that of patients with it. In addition, skin discoloration was identified that correlated with sclerotherapy response in LMs, and the efficacy of patients without skin discoloration was much better than that of other patients. But, the influence of these two factors on efficacy of LMs needs to be further identified in the further studies. Some studies indicated that the morphological subtypes of LMs affected sclerotherapy response [20, 32, 33]. We found that the clinical response was better in macrocystic and mixed lesions compared with microcystic lesions. Various reasons may lead to this result. One reason may be the small size of the cyst or channel and poor diffusion of the sclerosants within the lesion. Perhaps more critically, there is a relatively large soft tissue component compared to small cysts in the microcytic lesions. Therefore, even when cysts dissolve or shrink, there are still residual soft tissue masses that cannot be treated with sclerotherapy [34]. What’s more, our study found that focal lesion were independent predictors of good response to sclerotherapy. As we known, venous vascular malformations (VMs) and LMs belong to the low-flow vascular malformations, so they have the same therapeutic characteristics in some area. In VMs, Goyal et al. divided VMs into three categories according to MRI results of VMs size and marginal morphology [35]. They reported that patients with VMs lesions greater than 5 cm or with ill-defined boundaries responded poorly to percutaneous sclerotherapy.

The limitations of this study include retrospective design not covering all LMs patients treated with sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam and pingyangmycin sclerosants and a lack of standardized assessment tool to compare our results with other reports.


In summary, this study demonstrates that sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam combined with pingyangmycin appears to be an effective and safe treatment for LMs in children and some prognosis factors were confirmed. Nomogram basing on these prognostic factors was established to predict clinical response in children with LMs, which has good calibration and discrimination ability. The nomogram could help clinicians to make individualized predictions and provide targeted treatment recommendations for patients. In addition, inferring from our observation that macrocystic morphological subtype and focal of the lesion had significantly lesser number of sessions performed per patient.



The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomaly


Lymphatic malformations




Receiver operating characteristic


Venous vascular malformations


  1. Classification International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Accessed 27 November 2019

  2. Nosher JL, Murillo PG, Liszewski M, Gendel V, Gribbin CE. Vascular anomalies: a pictorial review of nomenclature, diagnosis and treatment. World J Radiol. 2014;6(9):677–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Grasso DL, Pelizzo G, Zocconi E, Schleef J. Lymphangiomas of the head and neck in children. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28(1):17–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. McCuaig CC. Update on classification and diagnosis of vascular malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29(4):448–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiegand S, Ott A, Zimmermann AP, Wilhelm T, Eivazi B, Werner JA. Localization of lymphatic malformations of the neck. Lymphat Res Biol. 2013;11(2):101–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiegand S, Eivazi B, Zimmermann AP, Neff A, Barth PJ, Sesterhenn AM, Mandic R, Werner JA. Microcystic lymphatic malformations of the tongue: diagnosis, classification, and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(10):976–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Christison-Lagay E. Complications in head and neck surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016;25(6):338–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramesh S, Duckwiler G, Goldberg RA, Rootman DB. Multimodality management of complex periorbital venolymphatic malformations. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(4):387–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCormack L, Jones K, Huang JT. Micro- and macrocystic lymphatic malformation. J Pediatr. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Meurisse V, Denamur S, Herbreteau D, Le Touze A, Favrais G, Pondaven-Letourmy S, Maruani A. Efficacy of sirolimus combined with sclerotherapy for giant cervical lymphatic macrocystic malformations: two newborn cases. Eur J Dermatol. 2019;29(1):90–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmults CD. Laser treatment of vascular lesions. Dermatol Clin. 2005;23(4):745–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Serres LM, Sie KC, Richardson MA. Lymphatic malformations of the head and neck. A proposal for staging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(5):577–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balakrishnan K, Bauman N, Chun RH, et al. Standardized outcome and reporting measures in pediatric head and neck lymphatic malformations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):948–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Leacy R, Bageac DV, Manna S, et al. A Radiologic grading system for assessing the radiographic outcome of treatment in lymphatic and lymphatic-venous malformations of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42(10):1859–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bagga B, Goyal A, Das A, Bhalla AS, Kandasamy D, Singhal M, Kairo A. Clinicoradiologic predictors of sclerotherapy response in low-flow vascular malformations. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(1):209-219.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Corso E, Cina A, Salonna G, Di Cintio G, Gaudino S, Panfili M, Colosimo C, Paludetti G. Sclerotherapy with polidocanol microfoam in head and neck venous and lymphatic malformations. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2022;42(2):116–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Markovic JN, Nag U, Shortell CK. Safety and efficacy of foam sclerotherapy for treatment of low-flow vascular malformations in children. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020;8(6):1074–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Q, Zhou Q, Zhao Z, Liu C, Zheng J. Successful sclerotherapy for cervicofacial macrocystic lymphatic malformations using polidocanol and pingyangmycin combined foam sclerosants. Lymphat Res Biol. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pessanha I, Bravo M, Piedade C, Lopes MF. Complex lymphatic malformations in pediatrics: a review of treatment options. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2022;74(1):70–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bouwman FCM, Kooijman SS, Verhoeven BH, Schultze Kool LJ, van der Vleuten CJM, Botden S, de Blaauw I. Lymphatic malformations in children: treatment outcomes of sclerotherapy in a large cohort. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(3):959–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blaise S, Charavin-Cocuzza M, Riom H, Brix M, Seinturier C, Diamand JM, Gachet G, Carpentier PH. Treatment of low-flow vascular malformations by ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy with polidocanol foam: 24 cases and literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(3):412–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamaki T, Sasaki Y, Hasegawa Y, Osada A, Konoeda H, Hamahata A, Nozaki M, Sakurai H. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy with polidocanol microfoam for lymphatic malformations. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5(5):707–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Horbach SE, Lokhorst MM, Saeed P, de Pontouraude CMGM, Rothová A, van der Horst CM. Sclerotherapy for low-flow vascular malformations of the head and neck: a systematic review of sclerosing agents. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(3):295–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu HW, Wang X, Zheng JW, Zhao HG, Ge J, Zhang L, Wang YA, Su LX, Fan XD. Treatment of deep-seated facial microcystic lymphatic malformations with intralesional injection of pingyangmycin. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(37): e4790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lam SC, Yuen HKL. Medical and sclerosing agents in the treatment of orbital lymphatic malformations: what’s new? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(5):380–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mai HM, Zheng JW, Zhou Q, Yang XJ, Wang YA, Fan XD. Intralesional injection of pingyangmycin is a safe and effective treatment for microcystic lymphatic malformations in the tongue. Phlebology. 2013;28(3):147–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng JW, Yang XJ, Wang YA, He Y, Ye WM, Zhang ZY. Intralesional injection of Pingyangmycin for vascular malformations in oral and maxillofacial regions: an evaluation of 297 consecutive patients. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(10):872–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo QF, Gan YH. Pingyangmycin with triamcinolone acetonide effective for treatment of lymphatic malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(4):345–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun Y, Gu H, Yang X, Cai R, Shang Y, Hu L, Wang Y, Chen H, Lin X. Bleomycin Polidocanol Foam (BPF) Stability—In Vitro evidence for the effectiveness of a novel sclerosant for venous malformations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(6):1011–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yun WS, Kim YW, Lee KB, Kim DI, Park KB, Kim KH, Do YS, Lee BB. Predictors of response to percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy (PES) in patients with venous malformations: analysis of patient self-assessment and imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(3):581–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim DW. OK-432 sclerotherapy of lymphatic malformation in the head and neck: factors related to outcome. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44(7):857–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Niti K, Manish P. Microcystic lymphatic malformation (lymphangioma circumscriptum) treated using a minimally invasive technique of radiofrequency ablation and sclerotherapy. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(11):1711–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Li X. The diagnosis and treatment progress of lymphatic malformations of the head and neck in children. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015;29(11):1049–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang H Jr, Xie C, Lin W, Zhou J, Yang W, Guo Z. Liposuction-like sclerotherapy technique for microcystic lymphatic malformation. Cureus. 2022;14(3): e22795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Goyal M, Causer PA, Armstrong D. Venous vascular malformations in pediatric patients: comparison of results of alcohol sclerotherapy with proposed MR imaging classification. Radiology. 2002;223(3):639–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank all the lymphatic malformation patients who participated in this study.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualization: ZW; methodology: ZW and HY; validation: HY; formal analysis: YZ; investigation: YZ; data curation: RF; writing—original draft preparation: ZW and YZ; writing–review and editing: ZW and YZ; supervision: PJ and HY; project administration: PJ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Radboudumc Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, reference number 2017–3850) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

This research was granted by the Institutional Review Committee of ethics Committee of Jiangxi Provincial Children’s Hospital, and all guardians signed informed consents.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Zou, Y., Fu, R. et al. A nomogram for predicting sclerotherapy response for treatment of lymphatic malformations in children. Eur J Med Res 27, 209 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Lymphatic malformation
  • Sclerotherapy
  • Pingyangmycin
  • Polidocanol
  • Nomogram