- Open Access
MED12 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors in pan-cancer
European Journal of Medical Research volume 27, Article number: 225 (2022)
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy elicits admirable anti-tumor responses across many types of cancer. Growing evidence point to a link to Mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) and DNA damage repair (DDR) and TGF-β signing, while the clinical data on the association of MED12 and ICIs response are lacking. In this study, clinical and whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from published studies were merged as a WES cohort to explore the association between MED12 mutation (MED12-Mut) and ICIs efficiency across cancers. Then, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) cohort was used for validating our findings. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort was used to perform anti-tumor immunity and prognosis analysis. In the WES cohort (n = 474), significant differences were detected between MED12-Mut and MED12-wildtype (MED12-Wt) patients regarding durable clinical benefit (DCB, 80.00% vs. 53.67%, P = 0.022). In addition, significantly prolonged PFS was observed in MED12-Mut patients (mPFS: not reached, NR vs. 5.87 months, HR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.85, log-rank P = 0.015), After taking into account age, gender, metastasis, treatment and TMB status, the result of multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression showed significantly better PFS (HR:0.40, 95% CI 0.18–0.92; P = 0.031). In the MSKCC cohort (n = 1513), overall survival advantage was achieved in MED12-Mut patients (mOS: 41 vs. 19 months, HR:0.54, 95%CI 0.34–0.85; log-rank P = 0.007), after taking into account same factors in WES cohort, this link still existed (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38–0.96, P = 0.033), Notably, TMB was also found significantly higher in MED12-Mut patients in both WES and MSKCC cohort. Further tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and DDR-related gene analysis revealed anti-tumor immunity in MED12-Mut patients. Totally, MED12-Mut successfully predicted better clinical outcomes in ICIs-treated pan-cancer cohort, indicating that MED12-Mut could serve as a potential predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors in pan-cancer.
To the editors,
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can elicit impressive improvement of survival in different cancer types. However, few patients can respond well to immunotherapy and reliable biomarkers are urgently needed . Emerging evidence indicates mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) together with the mediator complex, activates gene transcription in Wnt/β catenin signaling, which regulates anti-tumor immunity [2, 3]. However, clinical data on the association of alterations in transcriptional regulation-related genes and ICIs benefit are still lacking. Previous preclinical studies have shown that mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12), a component of the mediator transcription regulation complex, is associated with DNA damage repair (DDR) and TGF‑β receptor signaling [4, 5]. However, the role of MED12 in tumor immunotherapy is still uncertain. In this study, multidimensional data were used to probe the relationship between the efficacy of immunotherapy across cancers and MED12 mutations.
In the TCGA pan-cancer cohort, the average mutation frequency of MED12 was 3.35% and the specific mutation distribution in different cancers is shown in Additional file 2: Fig. S2. Then, to investigate whether the somatic mutations in MED12 were related to the response to ICIs, we collected the whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of 474 patients across 5 cancer types from 6 immunotherapy studies (http://www.cbioportal.org/) as a WES cohort (Additional file 1). The study flowchart, inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Clinical information of patients are shown in Additional file 5: Table S1, and the details of material and method was shown in Additional file 4. The results of assessment of the WES cohort revealed that MED12 mutant (MED12-Mut) patients had a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS: not reached, NR vs. 5.87 months, HR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.85, log-rank P = 0.015, Fig. 1A) than that of MED12 wildtype (MED12-Wt) patients. This link still existed in the multivariate-adjusted Cox model incorporating age, gender, TMB level, cancer type, and treatment (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.18–0.92, P = 0.031; Fig. 1B). In addition, MED12-Mut patients had a better clinical response (ORR: 50.0% vs. 29.17%, P = 0.077; DCR: 80.0% vs. 53.67%, P = 0.022, Fig. 1C, D) than that of MED12-Wt patients. To validate the predictive value of MED12, the MSKCC cohort (n = 1513) was surveyed to determine the relationship between MED12-Mut and overall survival (OS). In the MSKCC cohort, MED12-Mut patients achieved significantly longer OS (mOS: 41 vs. 19 months, HR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.85, log-rank P = 0.007, Fig. 1E) than that of MED12-Wt patients. Even taking into account the same factors as the WES cohort, the multivariate-adjusted Cox model also demonstrated that MED12-Mut was associated with significantly better OS (HR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.38–0.96, P = 0.033; Fig. 1F). To explore the prognostic value of MED12, survival analysis was performed in the TCGA cohort (non-ICI treatment cohort) according to MED12-Mut status. No significant difference was found in OS between the ME12-Mut and MED12-Wt subtypes (mOS: 84.7 vs. 72.1 months, HR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.71–1.04; log-rank P = 0.12, Additional file 3: Fig. S3).
Regarding the outstanding predictive value of MED12 in pan-cancer immunotherapy, the potential mechanisms were investigated. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB), which are relevant tools for the identification of patients likely to respond to ICIs, were studied first. In the immunotherapy cohort and TCGA cohort, MED12-Wt tumors had a higher TMB than MED12-Wt tumors (all P < 0.05, Fig. 2A–C). In addition, in the WES cohort, patients with MED12-Mut harbored higher TNB (P = 0.007, Fig. 2D). A previous study showed that the loss of MED12 leads to a significant upregulation of the immune genes associated with DNA repair deficiency . Therefore, the DDR gene set was used to explore the differences in DDR pathway variants between MED12-Mut and MED12-Wt samples. As expected, MED12-Mt samples had significantly more mutations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway (Fig. 2E). As a major component of the TME, immune infiltrates have been proven to contribute to tumor progression and immunotherapy responses . Therefore, to further investigate the association between anti-tumor immunity and MED12-Mut across multiple cancer types, the link between MED12 mutation and infiltration of immune cells was explored. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, especially CD8 T cells and dendritic cells (DC), were generally more abundant in MED12-Mut tumors than in MED12-Wt tumors across cancer types in TCGA (Fig. 2F). In fact, a large number of studies have indicated that the density of TILs is positively related to the immune response in various kinds of tumors. Increased infiltration of CD8 + T cells in tumors correlates with better outcomes [7, 8]. Dendritic cells are often associated with superior cross-presentation of antigens, which results in stronger CD8 + T cell immunity . Our results showed that MED12 mutated patients had higher levels of CD8 T cells and dendritic cell infiltration, which also indicated the increased tumor immunogenicity in MED12 mutated patients.
In summary, our study provides solid evidence that MED12 mutation is associated with a better clinical outcome of pan-cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, MED12 mutation has the potential to serve as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors across cancers. Validation of the predictive value in future prospective trials and exploration of the molecular mechanism in further molecular research are warranted for MED12.
Availability of data and materials
The materials of patient cohorts used for the current study were publicly available and can be accessed by the TCGA and CbioPortal database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, https://www.cbioportal.org/).
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Mediator complex subunit 12
DNA damage repair
The Cancer Genome Atlas
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Tumor mutation burden
Zhao B, Zhao H, Zhao J. Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy in clinical trials. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920937612.
Rosell R. Mediating resistance in oncogene-driven cancers. N Engl J Med. 2013;16:1551–2. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr1214549.
Pai SG, Carneiro BA, Mota JM, Costa R, Leite CA, Barroso-Sousa R, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin pathway: modulating anticancer immune response. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;1:101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0471-6.
Orafidiya FA, Davidson C, Wilkinson RD, Walker SM, Knight LA, Harkin PD, et al. Abstract 578: Loss of MED12 predicts for a DNA damage repair deficiency phenotype and activates immune signalling via the STING pathway. Cancer Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2018-578.
Huang S, Hölzel M, Knijnenburg T, Schlicker A, Roepman P, McDermott U, et al. MED12 controls the response to multiple cancer drugs through regulation of TGF-β receptor signaling. Cell. 2012;5:937–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.035.
Zhang Y, Zhang Z. The history and advances in cancer immunotherapy: understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;8:807–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0488-6.
Paul MS, Ohashi PS. The roles of CD8(+) T cell subsets in antitumor immunity. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;9:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2020.06.003.
Thommen DS, Koelzer VH, Herzig P, Roller A, Trefny M, Dimeloe S, et al. A transcriptionally and functionally distinct PD-1(+) CD8(+) T cell pool with predictive potential in non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1 blockade. Nat Med. 2018;7:994–1004. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0057-z.
Wculek SK, Cueto FJ, Mujal AM, Melero I, Krummel MF, Sancho D. Dendritic cells in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;1:7–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-019-0210-z.
Hellmann MD, Nathanson T, Rizvi H, Creelan BC, Sanchez-Vega F, Ahuja A, et al. Genomic features of response to combination immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;5:843-852.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.018.
Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, Kvistborg P, Makarov V, Havel JJ, et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015;6230:124–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1348.
Miao D, Margolis CA, Vokes NI, Liu D, Taylor-Weiner A, Wankowicz SM, et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint blockade in microsatellite-stable solid tumors. Nat Genet. 2018;9:1271–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0200-2.
Miao D, Margolis CA, Gao W, Voss MH, Li W, Martini DJ, et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Science. 2018;6377:801–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5951.
Van Allen EM, Miao D, Schilling B, Shukla SA, Blank C, Zimmer L, et al. Genomic correlates of response to CTLA-4 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Science. 2015;6257:207–11.
Liu D, Schilling B, Liu D, Sucker A, Livingstone E, Jerby-Arnon L, et al. Integrative molecular and clinical modeling of clinical outcomes to PD1 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat Med. 2019;12:1916–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0654-5.
Samstein RM, Lee CH, Shoushtari AN, Hellmann MD, Shen R, Janjigian YY, et al. Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types. Nat Genet. 2019;2:202–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0312-8.
We thank Dr. Chuang Qi, Dr. Wanglong Deng, Dr. Guanghua Lu, and Mr. Ran Ding from Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics for their kind assistance.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Additional file 1
: Fig. S1. Flowchart of the study design. A. Merge of WES cohorts from five published studies (Hellman et al. , Rizvi et al. , Miao et al [12, 13], Allen et al. , Liu et al. ). B. MSKCC cohort from the published study (Samstein et al ). C. The TCGA dataset was used to perform DDR-related gene mutation, tumor-infiltrating immune cells and prognostic analyses.
Additional file 2
: Fig. S2. The pan-cancer landscape of MED12 mutations across human tumors. The proportion of MED12 mutated tumors identified for each cancer type with alteration frequency in TCGA pan-cancer cohorts.
Additional file 3
: Fig. S3. Kaplan–Meier curves of OS between the MED12-Mut and wildtype groups in the TCGA cohort.
Additional file 4:
Materials and methods
Additional file 5
: Table S1. Detailed clinical information of the five WES cohorts and the MSKCC cohort.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y., Tan, Y., Zhang, Q. et al. MED12 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors in pan-cancer. Eur J Med Res 27, 225 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00856-z
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors
- Anti-tumor immunity