Skip to main content
Download PDF

Global trends and frontiers in research on coronary microvascular dysfunction: a bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2022

European Journal of Medical Research volume 27, Article number: 233 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a leading cause of ischemic heart disease. Over the past few decades, considerable progress has been made with respect to research on CMD. The present study summarized the current research hotspots and trends on CMD by applying a bibliometric approach.

Methods

Relevant publications between 2002 and 2022 were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection. Visualization network maps of countries, institutions, authors, and co-cited authors were built using VOSviewer. CiteSpace was used for keyword analysis and the construction of a dual-map overlay of journals and a timeline view of co-cited references.

Results

1539 CMD-related publications were extracted for bibliometric analysis. The annual publications generally showed an upward trend. The United States of America was the most prolific country, with 515 publications (33.5%). Camici P. G. was the most influential author, whereas the European Heart Journal, Circulation, and Journal of the American College of Cardiology were the most authoritative journals. Research hotspot analysis revealed that endothelial dysfunction as well as reduced nitric oxide production or bioavailability played critical roles in CMD development. Positron emission tomography was the most widely used imaging method for diagnosis. In addition, microvascular angina, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and heart failure have attracted much attention as the main clinical implications. Furthermore, international standards for CMD diagnosis and management may be the future research directions.

Conclusions

This study offers a comprehensive view about the hotspots and development trends of CMD, which can assist subsequent researchers and guide future directions.

Introduction

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a major cause of ischemic heart disease, which is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide due to population aging [1, 2]. The coronary microcirculation is a vascular lumen comprising vessels with a diameter < 500 μm, including pre-arterioles, arteries, and capillaries, which plays a crucial role in the physiological regulation of cardiac perfusion [3]. In the presence of enhanced myocardial oxygen demand, the coronary microcirculation can rapidly increase the blood flow via modulation of vascular resistance [4]. Nonetheless, various factors such as inflammation and endothelial dysfunction can lead to functional and structural abnormalities in coronary microvessels. These result in pathological impaired dilatation or increased constriction, ultimately impairing the ability of myocardial blood flow to adjust to variations in myocardial oxygen demand and thereby leading to impaired myocardial perfusion and ischemia; this anomaly is commonly referred to as CMD [5,6,7]. In the clinical setting, CMD is generally closely related to the pathogenesis and progression of numerous cardiovascular diseases, including microvascular angina, takotsubo syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and heart failure, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [8,9,10]. The prevalence of CMD has been reported by some studies to range from 40 to 70% in microvascular angina and to be 75% in HFpEF [11,12,13]. In addition, CMD is strongly associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including mortality, heart failure, arrhythmia, and nonfatal myocardial infarction [14].

Over the past few decades, considerable progress has been made with respect to research on CMD, especially in terms of epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods, prognosis, and management. However, because CMD involves multiple disciplines and fields, gaining systematic and comprehensive knowledge about the current state of research is difficult. Bibliometrics is a discipline that combines mathematics and statistics to evaluate research hotspots and trends in a field through quantitative and qualitative analyses and has been widely used in numerous areas, such as oncology, endocrinology, and rheumatology [15,16,17,18]. Nevertheless, no prior bibliometric analysis of CMD has been published. Therefore, the present study summarized the current research on CMD by applying a bibliometric approach, with a focus on: (i) the most influential countries, institutions, authors, and journals, as well as their impact and contribution to this field, and (ii) the research status, hotspots, and development trends in this field via an analysis of keywords and co-cited references. The purpose of this study is to develop an overall structure of the field of CMD and to identify research hotspots and trends to assist and guide future directions.

Materials and methods

Data sources

A literature search regarding CMD was conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The search strategy was as follows: TS = (“coronary microvascular” OR “coronary microcirculation” OR “coronary artery microcirculation” OR “coronary artery microvascular”) AND TS = (disorder* OR disturbance* OR disease* OR dysfunction*); literature type = article or review. The time span was between 2002 and 2022, and there was no language restriction. All data were downloaded in TXT format. To avoid changes due to daily updates to the database, all publication searches and data extractions were conducted on July 3, 2022. The flow chart of the study is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of literature selection

Full size image

Data analysis

Visualization network maps of countries, institutions, authors, and co-cited authors were built using VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) to analyze general information in the field of CMD. CiteSpace (version 5.8.R3) was used not only for keyword co-occurrence analysis, keyword cluster analysis, and keyword burst but also for the construction of a dual-map overlay of journals and a timeline view of co-cited references, allowing us to understand the status and predict the frontiers and hotspots of research in this field.

Results

Growing trends of publications

A total of 1539 publications (1190 articles and 349 reviews) met the inclusion criteria. The annual distribution of publications on CMD is shown in Fig. 2. The first article on CMD was published in 2004, with no papers being published in 2002 and 2003. The annual number of publications slightly declined at some timepoints between 2004 and 2021; however, an overall upward trend was observed (from 0 in 2002 to 193 in 2021). As of July 3, the number of publications in 2022 had reached 91. In general, CMD-related research has entered a period of rapid development and has recently received increasing attention from researchers.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Annual and cumulative number of publications related to coronary microvascular dysfunction

Full size image

Analysis of countries and institutions

The 1539 publications on CMD were from 57 different countries and 1643 different institutions. The visualization network maps show the number of articles published by different countries and institutions and the cooperation between them. The size of the nodes represents the number of published literature; the greater the size, the larger the number of publications. The links represent the association between countries or institutions, with a thicker link implying more cooperation. Overall, 35 countries had more than five articles, and 37 institutions had more than 15 articles (Fig. 3A and B). Publications on CMD were unevenly distributed across different countries. As presented in Table 1, the United States of America (USA) showed the highest output with 515 papers, accounting for 33.5% of the total, followed by Italy (239 papers), the United Kingdom (UK) (183 papers), Japan (158 papers), and China (151 papers). The UK had the highest average number of citations, indicating a strong academic reputation in the field of CMD. According to Table 2, three out of the top five institutions with the highest number of published papers were from the USA. The Mayo Clinic from the USA had the most publications. Furthermore, the University of Florida from the USA had the most citations on average, ranking fourth with respect to the number of published papers.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The visualization network map of collaboration between countries and institutions. A Collaboration network map of countries. B Collaboration network map of institutions

Full size image
Table 1 Top 5 productive countries related to coronary microvascular dysfunction
Full size table
Table 2 Top 5 productive institutions related to coronary microvascular dysfunction
Full size table

Extensive collaboration between countries and institutions promotes the development of a discipline. In the field of CMD, the cooperation between countries was relatively close, particularly the USA, which collaborated the most with other countries. In addition, a number of institutions exhibited active and close cooperation, especially institutions in the USA such as the University of Florida.

Analysis of authors and co-cited authors

A total of 7629 authors contributed to these 1539 articles, with 29,731 co-cited authors. An analysis of authors contributes to understanding the representative researchers and core research trends in a field. Additional file 1 lists the top eight most productive authors with more than 30 publications as well as the most frequently co-cited authors with more than 250 citations. Merz C. N. B., an American researcher who focused on investigating CMD in women, was the most productive author, with 48 papers [19,20,21,22]. The second most productive author was Camici P. G. from Italy, with 41 papers, who was concerned with research on CMD in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [23,24,25]. The third most productive author was another Italian researcher, Crea F., who published 38 articles and focused on the relationship between CMD and either myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary interventions [26,27,28,29]. Figure 4A shows the collaborative relationships among authors with more than five publications, indicating that authors formed relatively stable collaborative groups.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The visualization network map of cooperation and co-citation of authors. A Cooperation network map of authors. B Co-citation network map of authors

Full size image

The top eight most frequently co-cited authors were all from Western countries, with four from the USA, two from Germany, and two from Italy. Among the top eight most frequently co-cited authors, Camici P. G. ranked second with respect to the number of publications and had the most co-citations (535 times), followed by Fearon W. F. (342 co-citations) and Murthy V. L. (341 co-citations). Figure 4B shows the co-citation relationships between co-cited authors with more than 50 co-citations.

Analysis of journals and co-cited journals

Overall, CMD-related articles were published in 382 journals, with the top 10 most prolific journals being presented in Table 3. According to 2021 journal citation reports, 2/5 of the top 10 most prolific journals were classified to be in Quartile 1 (Q1). The International Journal of Cardiology published the most papers (n = 76), followed by the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology (n = 43) and the European Heart Journal (n = 32). Among the top 10 most prolific journals, Circulation had the highest impact factor (IF) (IF = 39.918), followed by the European Heart Journal (IF = 35.855).

Table 3 Top 10 productive journals related to coronary microvascular dysfunction
Full size table

In total, 4191 co-cited journals were identified and Table 4 summarizes the top 10 journals with the highest co-citations. Circulation had the most co-citations (10,084 times), followed by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (7177 times) and the European Heart Journal (3658 times). Among co-cited journals, the New England Journal of Medicine had the highest IF (IF = 176.079). In addition, 7/10 of the most co-cited journals were in Q1, and five of them were listed as among the top 10 most prolific journals.

Table 4 Top 10 co-cited journals related to coronary microvascular dysfunction
Full size table

Furthermore, a dual-map overlay of journals was constructed to show the citation relationship of the journals (Fig. 5). The citing journals are presented on the left, whereas the cited journals are on the right, with the colored line between them indicating the citation paths. The orange-colored path indicates that the articles belonging to Molecular/Biology/Genetics journals were primarily cited by those in Molecular/Biology/Immunology journals. On the other hand, the green-colored citation paths indicate that the articles from Molecular/Biology/Genetics and Health/Nursing/Medicine journals were primarily cited by those published in Medicine/Medical/Clinical journals.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The dual-map overlay of journals on coronary microvascular dysfunction

Full size image

Analysis of keywords

Keywords with similar meanings were combined prior to analysis. Figure 6A presents the network map of keyword co-occurrence. The larger the node is, the more frequently a keyword occurs; furthermore, the thicker the line between the nodes is, the more frequently the two keywords appear together. The keywords with the highest frequency of occurrence are presented in Table 5. After excluding the keywords consistent with the theme of our study, the most frequent keywords were as follows, covering the pathophysiology, clinical symptoms, diagnostic methods, and clinical implications of CMD: “coronary flow reserve” (183 times), “flow reserve” (180 times), “heart failure” (180 times), “endothelial dysfunction” (173 times), “angina pectoris” (160 times), “chest pain” (155 times), “nitric oxide” (129 times), “positron emission tomography” (118 times), and “myocardial infarction” (117 times).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The visualization network map of keywords. A Network map of keyword co-occurrence. B Network map of keyword clusters

Full size image
Table 5 Top 20 high-frequency keyword related to coronary microvascular dysfunction
Full size table

Keyword cluster analysis was conducted to reveal the current hotspots and basic knowledge structure of CMD-related research. The modularity Q of the cluster was 0.6963, indicating a significant cluster structure. The silhouette S was 0.856, suggesting convincing network homogeneity. Overall, 19 clusters were obtained (Fig. 6B). Clusters #2, #6, #15, and #18 were consistent with the theme of our study. Cluster #17 was related to research institutions and participants. The remaining clusters were categorized into the following five groups: (i) cluster #8, which focused on the pathophysiology of CMD, including “endothelial function”; (ii) cluster #4, which focused on the clinical symptoms of CMD, such as “chest pain”; (iii) clusters #3, #5, #12, #13, and #9, which focused on the diagnostic methods for CMD, including “index of microcirculatory resistance,” “coronary flow velocity reserve,” and “angiography”; (iv) clusters #0, #1, #7, #10, #14, and #16, which focused on CMD-related clinical implications, including “hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,” “takotsubo cardiomyopathy,” “microvascular angina,” and “heart failure”; and (v) cluster #11, which focused on the management of CMD, including “spironolactone.”

The keyword burst more comprehensively reflected the trends and frontiers of research on CMD and helped in predicting future research directions. Figure 7 depicts the top 25 burst keywords, with their start and end years as well as burst strengths. The blue line represents the timeline from 2004 to 2022, whereas the red line indicates the keyword burst during this period. It could be observed that the keywords were related to pathophysiology (nitric oxide), diagnostic methods (transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance), and clinical implications (left ventricular dysfunction, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension). Notably, the keyword “outcome” had persisted from 2018 to 2022, implying that studies concerning the prognosis of CMD have continued to receive attention over recent years. The terms “international standardization” and “diagnostic criteria” indicated that the development of international guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of CMD might be a future research direction.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Top 25 burst keywords related to coronary microvascular dysfunction

Full size image

Analysis of co-cited references

A total of 46,826 references were obtained. An analysis of the most co-cited references allowed researchers to appreciate research hotspots in a field. Additional file 2 shows the top 10 most co-cited references. The paper by Camici et al. titled “Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction,” which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007, was the most frequently cited article (309 citations). This paper reviewed examination methods, clinical classifications, and pathogenetic mechanisms of CMD [30]. The second most co-cited reference (178 times) was the article by Pepine et al. titled “Coronary Microvascular Reactivity to Adenosine Predicts Adverse Outcome in Women Evaluated for Suspected Ischemia: Results from the NHLBI Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).” This article reported that in women without obstructive coronary artery diseases, a lower coronary flow reserve led to a higher risk of major adverse events, including mortality, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for heart failure, suggesting that dysfunctional coronary microvessels might be novel targets for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in patients with ischemic heart disease [31]. The article by Crea et al. titled “Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: an Update,” which reviewed risk factors for CMD and recent advances in treatment strategies for CMD, was the third most co-cited reference (139 citations) [32]. Among the top 10 most frequently co-cited references, the article published by Ong et al. titled “International Standardization of Diagnostic Criteria for Microvascular Angina” had the highest number of average citations per year; this article provided a standardized guideline for the mechanism, diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical trial studies of microvascular angina [33].

Figure 8 presents a timeline view of co-cited references, showing the distribution of themes and their changes with time. Early research in this field primarily focused on “endothelium,” “echocardiography,” and “genetics.” However, these themes were gradually replaced by new themes over time. Recently, researchers had focused on “vasospastic angina,” “women,” “heart failure with preserved ejection fraction,” and “functional angiography,” particularly the relationship between CMD and vasospastic angina as well as between CMD and female sex.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Timeline view of co-cited references

Full size image

Discussion

General information

The research progress in the field of CMD could be estimated based on the number and trend of annual publications [34]. In general, the number of publications in this field had gradually increased over the past two decades. Relatively few articles were published from 2004 to 2019, indicating that research on CMD remains in its infancy. Since 2019, publications on CMD have entered a period of rapid growth, suggesting that research on CMD has received increasing attention over recent years.

Among numerous countries, the USA has made the most substantial contribution to this field. Three out of the top five most productive institutions (Mayo Clinic, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, and University of Florida) and four out of the top 10 most productive researchers are from the USA, making it the most productive country, with a total of 515 articles. In addition, the collaboration between the USA and other countries as well as between highly productive American institutions was mostly close, which had contributed greatly to the promotion of international communication and academic development in this field. As for the other countries and institutions, stronger collaboration and academic communication were required to facilitate development and progress in this field.

An analysis of author collaborative networks aids in understanding influential researchers and the collaborative relationship between researchers [35]. The most influential author was identified to be Camici P. G. from Italy, who ranked first in terms of co-citations and second with respect to the number of publications. Most articles by Camici P. G. were published in the top journals in the cardiovascular field, including the European Heart Journal, Circulation, and Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Among the publications of Camici P. G., the article titled “Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction,” which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007, was the most influential. This article summarized the four major types of CMD according to the clinical setting in which CMD occurs and the pathogenesis of CMD, including iatrogenic CMD, CMD in obstructive coronary artery disease, CMD in myocardial disease, and CMD without myocardial and obstructive coronary artery diseases [30]. In 2014, Camici P. G. and his partner, Crea F., updated this review in an article titled “Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: an Update,” published in the European Heart Journal. This article reviewed the pathogenesis and treatment of CMD and suggested that the underlying etiologies of CMD should be considered in clinical management, whether obstructive coronary artery disease or myocardial disease were present [32].

In addition, the European Heart Journal, Circulation, and Journal of the American College of Cardiology were all in Q1 and were present in all of the following three lists: the top 10 most prolific journals, the top 10 most co-cited journals, and the source journals for the top 10 most co-cited references. Thus, the European Heart Journal, Circulation, and Journal of the American College of Cardiology are the most mainstream and authoritative journals in the field of CMD.

Hotspots and frontiers

Based on the analysis of keywords and references, the hotspots and frontiers of research are summarized as follows:

Pathophysiology of CMD

Related keywords mainly included “endothelial dysfunction” and “nitric oxide.” Endothelial dysfunction is considered to be an important pathogenic factor for CMD. Normally, vascular endothelial cells can release vasodilator substances, such as nitric oxide, to modulate blood flow. The decreased production or reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide caused by impaired endothelial cells results in impaired vasodilation function. The impaired endothelial cells may also release vasoconstrictor substances that can reduce blood flow, such as endothelin, thromboxane A2, prostaglandin H2, and superoxide. Furthermore, the reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide leads to microvascular rarefaction and remodeling by causing angiogenic incompetence and increasing collagen deposition, which prompts functional and structural abnormalities of microcirculation, thus increasing the risk of myocardial ischemia [36, 37]. Rahman et al. proposed the existence of two distinct CMD endotypes based on physiological assessment in a catheter laboratory—namely, structural CMD and functional CMD [38]. Functional CMD is characterized by an attenuated vasodilatory reserve, which may be due to endothelial dysfunction, smooth muscle cell dysfunction, and sympathetic dysfunction [37, 39]. These may be attributed to an impairment in sirtuin 3-mediated endothelial cell metabolism, dysregulation of the endothelial-1/endothelin A receptor system, and abnormalities of the synthetic phenotype of viable smooth muscle cells responsible for radial contraction [40,41,42]. Structural abnormalities in CMD are mainly manifested by luminal narrowing of the microvessels, perivascular fibrosis, and capillary rarefaction [8], which are also considered to play a fundamental pathogenic role in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and heart failure [24]. In addition, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes have been identified as risk factors for CMD [43,44,45]. A previous study on pigs confirmed that diabetes could lead to CMD by causing cardiac microvascular rarefaction [46]. Research on pathophysiology allows for the possibility of preventing and treating CMD and is, hence, at the forefront.

Symptoms and diagnostic methods of CMD

The major keywords primarily included “chest pain,” “coronary flow reserve,” “index of microcirculatory resistance,” “angiography,” “coronary flow velocity reserve,” “myocardial perfusion,” “positron emission tomography,” “transthoracic Doppler echocardiography,” and “cardiac magnetic resonance.” Chest pain is the primary clinical manifestation of CMD [47], and approximately 30–60% of patients with CMD have been reported to have angina pectoris [48]. Currently, the diagnosis of CMD involves invasive and non-invasive techniques. Invasive methods, including the use of intracoronary Doppler-tipped guidewire, thermodilution techniques, and coronary reactivity testing, are the gold standard for CMD detection, which can measure the index of microvascular resistance and coronary flow reserve [2]. Non-invasive techniques can evaluate non-endothelial-dependent coronary microvascular function if there is no epicardial vessel obstruction [49]. Positron emission tomography represents a non-invasive imaging method that has recently been widely used to quantify myocardial blood flow, and its accuracy has been demonstrated by both animal and human experiments [50, 51]. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, another non-invasive detection technique for diagnosing CMD, has attracted increasing attention. Kellman et al. optimized the dual sequence for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and arterial input function measurement, which was used for the quantitative detection of myocardial blood flow [52]. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography has been applied to the assessment of coronary flow velocity ratios and has been shown to predict adverse outcomes in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease [50]. Therefore, the diagnosis of CMD remains a major research topic in this field because of the lack of an accurate, direct, and economical detection method for assessing microvascular function.

Clinical implications of CMD

Keywords in this category mainly included “heart failure,” “cardiac syndrome X,” “myocardial infarction,” “hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,” “takotsubo cardiomyopathy,” and “microvascular angina.” CMD is strongly associated with various coronary artery diseases [8]. Previous studies reported that approximately 40–70% of patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography for chest pain had no obstructive coronary artery disease, which was considered to be related to microvascular dysfunction [11, 12, 53]. Furthermore, the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF had been reported to be as high as 75%, with CMD having been shown to be positively associated with NTproBNP, cardiac dysfunction, and systemic endothelial dysfunction; therefore, it might be a potential risk predictor and a novel therapeutic target for HFpEF [13]. Further studies revealed that subendocardial ischemia might be one of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CMD-related HFpEF [54, 55]. Reduced capillary density and vascular remodeling and fibrosis lead to a decrease in the coronary blood flow reserve, which in turn results in the development of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and is closely associated with adverse prognosis [56,57,58,59]. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, also referred to as stress-induced cardiomyopathy or broken heart syndrome, presents as acute, transient, and reversible systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle [60, 61], and is strongly associated with CMD. According to some studies, patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy frequently have impaired myocardial perfusion and reduced coronary flow reserve [62, 63]. Furthermore, CMD can lead to the “no-reflow phenomenon” in patients with acute myocardial infarction, and the mechanisms involve damage to the arterial walls or obstruction in the microcirculation [64]. In addition, CMD in other diseases such as autoimmune rheumatic diseases and liver diseases has gained increasing attention [65,66,67,68]. The association between these clinical diseases and CMD has been shown in multiple studies; nonetheless, the deeper mechanisms still require extensive research.

Prognosis and management of CMD

The related keywords included “outcome” and “spironolactone.” Compared with people with normal perfusion, a reduced coronary flow reserve in patients means a four-to-fivefold increase in death and a three-to-fivefold increase in MACEs [14, 69, 70]; the lower the coronary flow reserve, the higher the risk of adverse outcomes [71]. Previous studies showed the substantial impact of CMD on the prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction [72,73,74]. In a cohort study involving 309 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were successfully revascularized, an index of microvascular resistance above 40 U signified a substantially increased risk of cardiac mortality or readmission for heart failure and was an independent predictor [75]. However, another study suggested that the bimodal shape of the thermodilution curve, rather than the index of microvascular resistance value itself, indicated an increased risk of MACEs within six months, and this might be a result of capillary obstructions [76]. A systematic review of 1094 patients further suggested that the index of hyperemic microvascular resistance and the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with STEMI after PCI aided in the early identification and early risk stratification of severe CMD and were prognostic indicators of MACEs [77]. In addition, CMD could be a prognostic indicator of MACEs in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, obesity, aortic stenosis, or chronic kidney disease [59, 78,79,80]. Therefore, CMD may serve as a crucial therapeutic target. Current studies have found that the coronary flow reserve can be enhanced by drugs targeting the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, statins, calcium channel blockers, and ranolazine to minimize MACEs [81,82,83,84,85,86]. Some traditional Chinese medicines have also been used to treat CMD, including Shenmai injection and Shexiang Tongxin dropping pills, which may improve coronary microvascular function, endothelial function, and microvascular structure abnormalities by reducing oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and apoptosis [87, 88]. In addition, CD34+ stem/progenitor cell therapy and neuropeptide-Y1 receptor antagonists have been discovered to possess therapeutic potential for CMD [89, 90]. Targeting the regulation of coronary microvascular dysfunction to improve clinical prognosis will be one of the difficulties and hotspots in the field of CMD in the future.

The results of the keyword burst notably indicated that “international standardization” and “diagnostic criteria” had recently been the major topics. Currently, the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of CMD are scattered in the guidelines for other diseases, and no standardized guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CMD have been developed. Therefore, several relevant studies and summaries are required.

Strengths and limitations

To date, the present study is the first bibliometric analysis in the field of CMD in which the most influential authors, countries, institutions, and journals as well as the research hotspots and development trends in this field were identified. However, this study has some limitations. First, publications were obtained from the WoSCC only, and other databases were absent. Nevertheless, the WoSCC is recognized as the most authoritative, comprehensive, and multidisciplinary database and is the most commonly used database for bibliometric analysis. Therefore, the articles included in this study were relatively comprehensive. Second, some recent high-quality publications were less cited, and their influence might have been underestimated. Thus, a future update of the bibliometric analysis in the field of CMD is necessary.

Conclusions

Overall, the number of annual publications in the field of CMD showed an upward trend from 2002 to 2022. The USA was the most influential country and had established stable partnerships with several other countries. Camici P. G. was the most influential author. With respect to the number of publications and co-citations, the European Heart Journal, Circulation, and Journal of the American College of Cardiology were the most authoritative journals in this field. The research hotspots were primarily related to the pathophysiology, diagnostic methods, clinical implications, and management of CMD. Specifically, regarding the pathophysiology of CMD, endothelial dysfunction as well as reduced nitric oxide production or bioavailability played critical roles in CMD development. As for diagnosis, invasive techniques were gradually replaced by non-invasive techniques, and positron emission tomography was currently the most widely used imaging method. In terms of CMD-related clinical implications, microvascular angina, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and heart failure had been identified as the hotspots over recent years. Furthermore, CMD had been shown to be associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes; thus, treatment and management to improve clinical prognosis are at the forefront. However, international standards for the diagnosis and management of CMD are still currently lacking, which may be a future research direction.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional information files.

References

  1. Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Flaxman A, et al. The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129(14):1493–501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Travieso A, Jeronimo-Baza A, Faria D, Shabbir A, Mejia-Renteria H, Escaned J. Invasive evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022;29(5):2474–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02997-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaski JC, Crea F, Gersh BJ, Camici PG. Reappraisal of ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2018;138(14):1463–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rocco E, Grimaldi MC, Maino A, Cappannoli L, Pedicino D, Liuzzo G, et al. Advances and challenges in biomarkers use for coronary microvascular dysfunction: from bench to clinical practice. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):2055. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cannon RR, Epstein SE. “Microvascular angina” as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61(15):1338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Masi S, Rizzoni D, Taddei S, Widmer RJ, Montezano AC, Luscher TF, et al. Assessment and pathophysiology of microvascular disease: recent progress and clinical implications. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(26):2590–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell B, Carpenter JS, Cognard C, Dippel D, et al. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(6):612–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Del BM, Montone RA, Camilli M, Carbone S, Narula J, Lavie CJ, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(13):1352–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Maron BJ, Prasad SK, Cecchi F, Udelson JE, et al. The case for myocardial ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(9):866–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Padro T, Manfrini O, Bugiardini R, Canty J, Cenko E, De Luca G, et al. ESC Working Group on coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation position paper on “coronary microvascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease.” Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(4):741–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sara JD, Widmer RJ, Matsuzawa Y, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(11):1445–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(10):886–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah SJ, Lam C, Svedlund S, Saraste A, Hage C, Tan RS, et al. Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(37):3439–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, Howard JP, Rahman H, Foley M, Nowbar AN, et al. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(16):1582–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma C, Su H, Li H. Global research trends on prostate diseases and erectile dysfunction: a bibliometric and visualized study. Front Oncol. 2020;10: 627891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hao KJ, Jia X, Dai WT, Huo ZM, Zhang HQ, Liu JW, et al. Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots of triple negative breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 689553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang C, Jing H, Sun Z, Yao J, Zhang X, Liu T, et al. A bibliometric analysis of primary aldosteronism research from 2000 to 2020. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 665912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xing D, Zhao Y, Dong S, Lin J. Global research trends in stem cells for osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(7):1372–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dean J, Cruz SD, Mehta PK, Merz CN. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: sex-specific risk, diagnosis, and therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(7):406–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamarappoo B, Samuel TJ, Elboudwarej O, Thomson L, Aldiwani H, Wei J, et al. Left ventricular circumferential strain and coronary microvascular dysfunction: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) Project. Int J Cardiol. 2021;327:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei J, Nelson MD, Szczepaniak EW, Smith L, Mehta PK, Thomson LE, et al. Myocardial steatosis as a possible mechanistic link between diastolic dysfunction and coronary microvascular dysfunction in women. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;310(1):H14–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomson LE, Wei J, Agarwal M, Haft-Baradaran A, Shufelt C, Mehta PK, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(4):e002481. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lazzeroni D, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. From left ventricular hypertrophy to dysfunction and failure. Circ J. 2016;80(3):555–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Camici PG, Tschope C, Di Carli MF, Rimoldi O, Van Linthout S. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophy and heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(4):806–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Gistri R, Lorenzoni R, Chiriatti G, Girolami F, et al. Relevance of coronary microvascular flow impairment to long-term remodeling and systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(5):1043–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Niccoli G, Scalone G, Lerman A, Crea F. Coronary microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(13):1024–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Vita A, Manfredonia L, Lamendola P, Villano A, Ravenna SE, Bisignani A, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndrome and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108(12):1364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Milo M, Nerla R, Tarzia P, Infusino F, Battipaglia I, Sestito A, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: correlation with exercise stress test results. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(1):121–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Vita A, Milo M, Sestito A, Lamendola P, Lanza GA, Crea F. Association of coronary microvascular dysfunction with restenosis of left anterior descending coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous intervention. Int J Cardiol. 2016;219:322–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):830–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, Reis SE, Smith KM, Handberg EM, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2825–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Crea F, Camici PG, Bairey MC. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: an update. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(17):1101–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ong P, Camici PG, Beltrame JF, Crea F, Shimokawa H, Sechtem U, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. Int J Cardiol. 2018;250:16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma D, Yang B, Guan B, Song L, Liu Q, Fan Y, et al. A bibliometric analysis of pyroptosis from 2001 to 2021. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 731933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang YD, Li Y, Zhao J, Wang XY, Zhu HZ, Chen XH. Study of acupuncture for low back pain in recent 20 years: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace. J Pain Res. 2017;10:951–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Vancheri F, Longo G, Vancheri S, Henein M. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pries AR, Reglin B. Coronary microcirculatory pathophysiology: can we afford it to remain a black box? Eur Heart J. 2017;38(7):478–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rahman H, Ryan M, Lumley M, Modi B, McConkey H, Ellis H, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with myocardial ischemia and abnormal coronary perfusion during exercise. Circulation. 2019;140(22):1805–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bairey MC, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, Fleg JL. Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation. 2017;135(11):1075–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeng H, Chen JX. Sirtuin 3, endothelial metabolic reprogramming, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2019;74(4):315–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ford TJ, Corcoran D, Padmanabhan S, Aman A, Rocchiccioli P, Good R, et al. Genetic dysregulation of endothelin-1 is implicated in coronary microvascular dysfunction. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(34):3239–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Dora KA, Borysova L, Ye X, Powell C, Beleznai TZ, Stanley CP, et al. Human coronary microvascular contractile dysfunction associates with viable synthetic smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(8):1978–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Erdogan D, Yildirim I, Ciftci O, Ozer I, Caliskan M, Gullu H, et al. Effects of normal blood pressure, prehypertension, and hypertension on coronary microvascular function. Circulation. 2007;115(5):593–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sorop O, Olver TD, van de Wouw J, Heinonen I, van Duin RW, Duncker DJ, et al. The microcirculation: a key player in obesity-associated cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113(9):1035–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Di Carli MF, Janisse J, Grunberger G, Ager J. Role of chronic hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(8):1387–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hinkel R, Howe A, Renner S, Ng J, Lee S, Klett K, et al. Diabetes mellitus-induced microvascular destabilization in the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(2):131–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Herrmann J, Kaski JC, Lerman A. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(22):2771–2782b.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Taqueti VR, Di Carli MF. Coronary microvascular disease pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic options: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(21):2625–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bechsgaard DF, Prescott E. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: a practical approach to diagnosis and management. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2021;23(9):54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schroder J, Michelsen MM, Mygind ND, Suhrs HE, Bove KB, Bechsgaard DF, et al. Coronary flow velocity reserve predicts adverse prognosis in women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the iPOWER study. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(3):228–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Feher A, Sinusas AJ. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function: dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(8):e006427. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kellman P, Hansen MS, Nielles-Vallespin S, Nickander J, Themudo R, Ugander M, et al. Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Aribas E, Roeters VLJ, Elias-Smale SE, Piek JJ, Roos M, Ahmadizar F, et al. Prevalence of microvascular angina among patients with stable symptoms in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(3):763–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sinha A, Rahman H, Webb A, Shah AM, Perera D. Untangling the pathophysiologic link between coronary microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(43):4431–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Obokata M, Reddy Y, Melenovsky V, Kane GC, Olson TP, Jarolim P, et al. Myocardial injury and cardiac reserve in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(1):29–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Guclu A, Happe C, Eren S, Korkmaz IH, Niessen HW, Klein P, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract gradient is associated with reduced capillary density in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy irrespective of genotype. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45(12):1252–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Timmer SA, Knaapen P. Coronary microvascular function, myocardial metabolism, and energetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insights from positron emission tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(2):95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Aguiar RS, Rocha LL, Fiarresga A, Ferreira RC, Mota CM. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: pathophysiology, assessment, and clinical impact. Microcirculation. 2021;28(1): e12656.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cecchi F, Olivotto I, Gistri R, Lorenzoni R, Chiriatti G, Camici PG. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(11):1027–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Fan X, Yang G, Kowitz J, Akin I, Zhou X, El-Battrawy I. Takotsubo syndrome: translational implications and pathomechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rivero F, Cuesta J, Garcia-Guimaraes M, Bastante T, Alvarado T, Antuna P, et al. Time-related microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6):699–700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Elesber A, Lerman A, Bybee KA, Murphy JG, Barsness G, Singh M, et al. Myocardial perfusion in apical ballooning syndrome correlate of myocardial injury. Am Heart J. 2006;152(3):469.e9-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rigo F, Sicari R, Citro R, Ossena G, Buja P, Picano E. Diffuse, marked, reversible impairment in coronary microcirculation in stress cardiomyopathy: a Doppler transthoracic echo study. Ann Med. 2009;41(6):462–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Oikonomou E, Mourouzis K, Vogiatzi G, Siasos G, Deftereos S, Papaioannou S, et al. Coronary microcirculation and the no-reflow phenomenon. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(25):2934–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Piaserico S, Osto E, Famoso G, Zanetti I, Gregori D, Poretto A, et al. Treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors restores coronary microvascular function in young patients with severe psoriasis. Atherosclerosis. 2016;251:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kakuta K, Dohi K, Sato Y, Yamanaka T, Kawamura M, Ogura T, et al. Chronic inflammatory disease is an independent risk factor for coronary flow velocity reserve impairment unrelated to the processes of coronary artery calcium deposition. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(2):173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Montisci R, Vacca A, Garau P, Colonna P, Ruscazio M, Passiu G, et al. Detection of early impairment of coronary flow reserve in patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(9):890–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Vita T, Murphy DJ, Osborne MT, Bajaj NS, Keraliya A, Jacob S, et al. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease at CT and coronary microvascular dysfunction at myocardial perfusion PET/CT. Radiology. 2019;291(2):330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Gdowski MA, Murthy VL, Doering M, Monroy-Gonzalez AG, Slart R, Brown DL. Association of isolated coronary microvascular dysfunction with mortality and major adverse cardiac events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(9): e014954.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Brainin P, Frestad D, Prescott E. The prognostic value of coronary endothelial and microvascular dysfunction in subjects with normal or non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2018;254:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rahman H, Demir OM, Ryan M, McConkey H, Scannell C, Ellis H, et al. Optimal use of vasodilators for diagnosis of microvascular angina in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(6): e009019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Aggarwal S, Xie F, High R, Pavlides G, Porter TR. Prevalence and predictive value of microvascular flow abnormalities after successful contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(6):674–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bolognese L, Carrabba N, Parodi G, Santoro GM, Buonamici P, Cerisano G, et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodeling and long-term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109(9):1121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Fearon WF, Low AF, Yong AS, McGeoch R, Berry C, Shah MG, et al. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2013;127(24):2436–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Choi KH, Dai N, Li Y, Kim J, Shin D, Lee SH, et al. Functional coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(15):1670–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Fukunaga M, Fujii K, Kawasaki D, Sawada H, Miki K, Tamaru H, et al. Thermodilution-derived coronary blood flow pattern immediately after coronary intervention as a predictor of microcirculatory damage and midterm clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(2):149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Canu M, Khouri C, Marliere S, Vautrin E, Piliero N, Ormezzano O, et al. Prognostic significance of severe coronary microvascular dysfunction post-PCI in patients with STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(5): e0268330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Bajaj NS, Osborne MT, Gupta A, Tavakkoli A, Bravo PE, Vita T, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in obese patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(7):707–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhou W, Bajaj N, Gupta A, Sun YP, Divakaran S, Bibbo C, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, left ventricular remodeling, and clinical outcomes in aortic stenosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28(2):579–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Bajaj NS, Singh A, Zhou W, Gupta A, Fujikura K, Byrne C, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, left ventricular remodeling, and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney impairment. Circulation. 2020;141(1):21–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Shah SA, Echols JT, Sun C, Wolf MJ, Epstein FH. Accelerated fatty acid composition MRI of epicardial adipose tissue: development and application to eplerenone treatment in a mouse model of obesity-induced coronary microvascular disease. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88(4):1734-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Neglia D, Fommei E, Varela-Carver A, Mancini M, Ghione S, Lombardi M, et al. Perindopril and indapamide reverse coronary microvascular remodelling and improve flow in arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2011;29(2):364–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Luo WH, Guo Y, Huang JW, Zhang PD. Do statins have a positive impact on patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction on long-term clinical outcome? A large retrospective cohort study. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:4069097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Yong J, Tian J, Yang X, Xing H, He Y, Song X. Effects of oral drugs on coronary microvascular function in patients without significant stenosis of epicardial coronary arteries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of coronary flow reserve. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7: 580419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Kofler T, Hess S, Moccetti F, Pepine CJ, Attinger A, Wolfrum M, et al. Efficacy of ranolazine for treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. CJC Open. 2021;3(1):101–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zheng Z, Yu Z, Xu B, Zhou Y, Xing Y, Li Q, et al. Pretreatment with Shenmai injection protects against coronary microvascular dysfunction. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:8630480.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Bai Y, Zhang M, Peng S, Wang Y, Gu Y, Fang Q, et al. Efficacy of shexiang tongxin dropping pills in a swine model of coronary slow flow. Front Physiol. 2022;13: 913399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Prasad M, Corban MT, Henry TD, Dietz AB, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Promise of autologous CD34+ stem/progenitor cell therapy for treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(8):1424–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Herring N, Tapoulal N, Kalla M, Ye X, Borysova L, Lee R, et al. Neuropeptide-Y causes coronary microvascular constriction and is associated with reduced ejection fraction following ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(24):1920–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing service.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Beijing Nova Program (Z181100006218035) and the Traditional Chinese Medicine Ancient Book Documents and Characteristic Technology Inheritance Project of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (GZY-KJS-2020-079).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jing Gao and Tiantian Meng contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

    Jing Gao, Tiantian Meng, Min Li, Ruolin Du, Jingyi Ding, Anqi Li & Qingyong He

  2. Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China

    Jing Gao

  3. Graduate School, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    Shanshan Yu & Yixiang Li

Authors
  1. Jing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiantian Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruolin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jingyi Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anqi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shanshan Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yixiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qingyong He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JG, TM and QH designed the study. JG and TM analyzed the data and wrote the original draft. ML and RD helped to collect the data. JD and AL helped to check the data. SY and YL helped to polish the manuscript. QH revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingyong He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Top 8 productive authors and co-cited authors related to coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Additional file 2.

Top 10 co-cited references related to coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, J., Meng, T., Li, M. et al. Global trends and frontiers in research on coronary microvascular dysfunction: a bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2022. Eur J Med Res 27, 233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00869-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00869-8

Keywords

  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • VOSviewer
  • CiteSpace
  • Visual analysis

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us