Skip to main content

Evaluation, management and future perspectives of anal pruritus: a narrative review

Abstract

Purpose

The without a time limitation. Most recent search was performed on 1st June 2022.

Results

Thorough history and physical examination are very important in view of multiple possible causes of anal pruritus. Most of the focus during examination is drawn on to the perianal region. A digital rectal examination and an anoscopy are essential. It is necessary aim of this narrative review is to overview the classification, diagnostics, possible treatment options and future perspective of anal pruritus.

Methods

The search was performed by two authors (AD and MJ) independently in the following electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL and the Allied and Complementary Medicine Databases (AMED). Search was restricted to English language only to avoid moisture and the use of soaps in the perianal region. Furthermore, the patient should avoid certain foods and increase the intake of fiber. If the symptoms do not resolve, topical steroids, capsaicin (0.006%) and tacrolimus (0.1%) ointments may be used. For intractable cases, intradermal methylene blue injection might give a long-lasting symptom relief.

Conclusion

Anal pruritus is a long-term deteriorating quality of life issue. Most of the time it is a symptom with a difficult diagnosis. Thorough history and examination should be performed for the best possible treatment.

Introduction

Anal pruritus is defined as a condition characterized by itching around the perianal region. It affects around 1–5% of the general adult population, and it is four times more common in men than women [1]. Although, not life threatening, when long lasting this condition can greatly impair patient’s quality of life and even result in psychological issues [2, 3]. It is mainly categorized as either primary (idiopathic) or secondary, being a consequence of causal pathology. The main linking factor of the idiopathic pruritis is thought to be an increased fecal contamination of the anal region [4, 5]. Several studies showed abnormal sphincter relaxation leading to fecal soiling and perianal irritation initiating what is called an itch–scratch cycle [6,7,8]. In this narrative review we overview the classification, diagnostics and possible treatment options of anal pruritus.

Materials and methods

The systematic literature search was performed in the following electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL and the Allied and Complementary Medicine Databases (AMED). The search consisted of terms: “anal itch”, “pruritus ani”, “anal pruritus”, “perianal sore”, “perianal burning”, “chronic itch”, “chronic pruritus”, “perianal dermatitis”.

The search was restricted to English language publications only without a time limitation. Most recent search was performed on 1st June 2022. Both authors reviewed articles independently for inclusion. Additionally, the reference lists were searched, and relevant studies were included.

Review

Clinical features, diagnosis and classifications

Patients with anal pruritus present with itching, burning and soreness in the perianal region subsequently leading to scratching [6]. One of the crucial diagnostic goals is to differentiate between primary and secondary pruritus. Literature data are contradicting which of the types is more common [6, 9]. There are up to 100 conditions leading to perianal itching, which makes differential diagnostics and treatment quite challenging (most frequent can be seen in Table 1) [10,11,12,13]. In view of that, a thorough history and digital examination is of great importance.

Table 1 Main causes of secondary anal pruritus

The onset of the disease varies, but more often patients experience itch during the night or in the hot weather. It is necessary to inquire if the patient noticed any factors that exaggerate or alleviate the symptoms, for example, tight clothing that promotes sweating may make the itching worse [14]. Residue from detergents on clothing may also amplify the symptoms [10]. In several studies tobacco use, alcohol and several food products, such as milk, chocolate, citrus or tomatoes have been linked to idiopathic anal pruritus [9, 15]. Furthermore, patients’ hygienic practices are important, the use of soaps, perfumes and the frequency of cleansing must be documented. Inquiry about their previous patch testing and other past medical history is important as some of them could be directly linked to the development of pruritus (Table 1). Severe allergies and hereditary conditions should be noted when taking the family history. Anal pruritus in several family members is uncommon, but infectious diseases should be excluded in such context [16]. Moreover, the use of any medications, especially steroids and antibiotics, must be considered. Even the use of simple, over the counter and topical medications, has to be noted, as they may change the symptoms and appearance of the perianal region during physical examination [17].

A detailed proctological history is necessary; it should include questions about bowel movement frequency, consistency and if there were any recent changes. In cases when fecal incontinence is suspected, a specialized questionnaire, such as Wexner score, could be useful in objectifying and grading the severity of the problem [18]. The history should include whether the patient has any anorectal conditions, most importantly ones listed in Table 1; if the patient underwent any coloproctological procedures.

A thorough general physical examination may expose other sites of dermatological conditions, allergies and infections. Most of the focus during examination is drawn on the perianal region, however, the perineal and genital regions should not be forgotten as their inspection may indicate other, with pruritus-associated pathologies. In the early stages of the disease the perianal region seems normal and in more severe acute cases it presents with excoriations and mild erythema, when the disease progresses skin becomes thin, friable and lichenified [6, 19]. If macular erythema, hyperkeratosis and/or radial fissuring are present, a diagnosis of contact dermatitis is highly possible [20]. Atopic dermatitis is characterized by thickened skin and leathery patches and is usually hereditary with other site lesions. After a visual inspection, a digital rectal examination should follow. Anoscopy should be performed for all the patients with anal pruritus to identify commonly associated proctological diseases such as hemorrhoids, anal fistula or fissures as this would change the therapeutic approach later on [4, 6].

Unusual findings during digital rectal examination, sudden changes in bowel habits, long-standing inflammatory bowel disease and family history of adenomas or colorectal cancer should prompt the clinician to consider a colonoscopy [21]. Infectious etiologies are quite often diagnosed in patients with anal pruritus, thus microbiological investigation should be considered in a high-risk patient. To avoid a high rate of false negative results, correct sample collection, culture mediums and sample storage are crucial [4, 10]. Usually, blood samples are unnecessary unless the patient has systemic symptoms or treatment refractory disease. Ulcerous or persistent lesions require tissue biopsies, they should include both the lesion and normal skin. A case series study by Abu-Asi et al. suggests that all the patients should be patch tested for allergies as around 20% of them will have relevant allergens to be avoided [22].

Although not widely used in clinical practice, several additional classification systems have been proposed by various authors. It can be acute or chronic (lasting over 6 weeks) [23]. According to the condition of the perianal skin Kuehn et al. proposed a 4-stage classification [24]:

  • Stage 1 (mild): No lesion is seen at inspection of anal verge, but patient finds palpation and/or anoscopy painful. Other anal lesions have been excluded.

  • Stage 2 (moderate): Red dry skin only, at times weeping skin with superficial round splits and longitudinal superficial fissures.

  • Stage 3 (severe): Reddened weeping skin, with superficial ulcers and excoriations disrupted by pale, whitish areas with no more hairs.

  • Stage 4 (chronic): Pale, whitened, thickened, dry leathery, scaly, skin with no hairs and no superficial ulcers or excoriations (chronic condition)

A similar classification system was proposed by the Washington Hospital Center [25]:

  • Stage 0—normal skin.

  • Stage 1 is erythematous, inflamed skin.

  • Stage 2 is lichenified skin

  • Stage 3 is lichenified skin with erosions and ulcerations.

Additionally, one study developed the Anal Pruritus Life Quality Index to better quantify the impact that anal pruritus has on quality of life [26]. The questionnaire for index calculation includes 14 questions that are answered by the patient on a 10-point scale. Unfortunately, this index did not gain attention from other researchers and was never validated.

Treatment

Management of patients with anal pruritus may be challenging and long lasting. In cases when an exact etiology causing pruritus has been diagnosed, an intervention eliminating this factor usually is enough to resolve the symptoms [27]. For instance, the infectious pruritus causes should be treated with antiviral, antibiotic, antifungal or anthelminthic medicine, according to the detected microorganisms. Similarly, when a proctological disease such as hemorrhoids, anal fistula or fissure are suspected to be the underlying cause of pruritus, the treatment of these conditions usually, but not always, bring relief from pruritus symptoms [28].For idiopathic pruritus and some of the inflammatory dermatoses escalating treatment tactic is recommended [4, 10, 13, 27]. In such cases, patient education, patience and reassurance are the key to a successful outcome. This generic management for idiopathic pruritus ani is effective in more than 90% of patients [14].

Cleansing should be done several times per day using water or damp tissues and drying off completely afterward [29,30,31]. Removal of skin tags to ease the management of hygiene could be performed, however, patients should be carefully selected [4, 6, 32]. Excessive wiping and scrubbing of the perianal area should be avoided, especially with soaps, as it causes further mechanical damage and irritation. It is necessary to avoid humidity in the perianal region, so synthetic tight-fitting underwear should not be worn. Additionally, cornstarch powder or talc can be used to absorb excessive moisture [14]. The patient should be counseled to eliminate possibly irritating laundry detergents and perfumes. The patient should avoid coffee, coke, citrus, chocolate, alcohol, dairy products, tomatoes and spicy food [6, 19]. An addition of a high-fiber diet with fiber supplementation is recommended to absorb excessive moisture from the stool and reduce the incidence of occult fecal seepage. In cases when fiber only is not enough, antidiarrheal medicine such as loperamide can be prescribed [4].

Emollients and barrier creams are key to pruritus treatment and should be used after cleansing [33]. A pilot study by Tomi et al. included 28 patients to evaluate the efficacy of a film forming acrylate cream (Cavilon™ Durable Barrier Cream) for alleviating anal pruritus symptoms [26]. They used the Anal Pruritus Life Quality Index and concluded that the cream had a significant quality of life improvement. However, as the study was funded by the manufacturer of the cream, results should be critically appraised. Moreover, creams containing menthol can have an anti-pruritic effect [33, 34]. Another possible topical option is a mild steroid ointment (1% hydrocortisone). A randomized controlled cross-over trial proved its effectiveness, as after 2 weeks of treatment with a 1% hydrocortisone ointment, 68% and 75% of patients had itch reduction and quality of life improvement, respectively [35]. The use of more potent steroids or prolonged use of may eventually lead to dermal atrophy and worsen the condition [4, 10, 33]. In a randomized double-blind cross-over trial that enrolled 21 patients the use of 0.1% topical tacrolimus ointment managed to significantly decrease the itch intensity and frequency and resulted in symptom reduction in 68% of the patients 2 weeks after treatment It should be noted that the use of tacrolimus ointment did have a positive effect on the Dermatology Life Quality index, however the difference when compared to the placebo group was not significant [36]. The use of the other topical immunomodulator pimecrolimus was never investigated on idiopathic anal pruritus patients, however it is effective in treating itch caused by atopic dermatitis, although, as the literature shows, it is less effective than Tacrolimus [37, 38]. Another topical treatment option is 0.006% Capsaicin cream. After the initial burning sensation it provides desensitization and relief of the symptoms [34]. A study by Lysy et al. determined that the 0.006% concentration was effective in alleviating pruritus ani without the significant burning sensation, which is commonly caused by creams that are more concentrated. Furthermore, they showed in a randomized double-blind cross-over study that 0.006% Capsaicin cream decreased symptoms in 70% of the study cohort and prevented them from recurring [39].

Systemic treatment options have also been described in the literature [4]. Oral antihistamines (first-generation) may be beneficial to patients suffering from nocturnal scratching. Their inhibitory effect is negligible, however, they mainly act by sedating the patient [10, 33]. Antidepressants and neuroleptics are used in managing anal pruritus, however, their effectiveness was only tested for treating other locations pruritus [33].

In long lasting intractable idiopathic pruritus cases, intradermal methylene blue injections may be used as a solution [40]. These injections act by destroying the intradermal nerve endings [41]. Eusebio et al. in their study patients under intravenous anesthesia injected up to 30 ml of 0.5% methylene blue to perianal area [41]. Up to 9.5 years of follow-up showed that 10 out of 23 patients had complete relief. Unfortunately, during the study three patients developed full thickness skin necrosis and required surgical debridement, this could be probably explained by the large injected volumes, as other studies used several times smaller and did not experience such complications [42]. Several following studies, with few technical variations, confirmed successful and long lasting results [42,43,44]. However, a recent literature review concluded that larger clinical studies are needed to gather stronger evidence on this treatment method [45]. In Fig. 1, we summarize the diagnostics and treatment for patients with suspected anal pruritus.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagnostics and treatment algorithm of pruritus ani

Future perspectives

The last few decades of extensive research into the neuroimmune itch pathways provided the foundation for novel therapeutics of chronic itch [46, 47]. Although, none of the further discussed medication have been tested on patients having anal pruritus, but they have great potential in being effective, as they mainly target different parts of itch sensation circuitry [46]. One of the most promising novel agents are monoclonal antibodies targeted against various inflammatory molecules. One of the first to get the FDA approval was dupilumab, which occupies IL-4 receptor α, thus blocking the effects of IL-4 and IL-13 [48]. It showed a broad spectrum of anti-itch action as it significantly alleviated chronic itch for patients with atopic dermatitis, chronic prurigo nodularis [49,50,51]. Furthermore, as the systematic review by Gael et al. show, the use of dupilumab can help 14% of patients with chronic idiopathic itch achieve full resolution and up to 89% can reach marked improvement. Lebrikizumab and tralokinumab are directed against IL-13 and act on the same pathway as dupilumab. However, differently to dupilumab, their use case is more limited as they have been mostly tested on patients with atopic dermatitis [52]. Less investigated, but also quite promising agents are nemolizumab, an IL-31 receptor α antibody, and an experimental agent vixarelimab (NCT03816891) targeting oncostatin M (OSM) receptor β block the IL-31/OSM pathway and thus exert anti-pruritic effect [53]. These two antibodies were mainly tested on inflammatory dermatoses, thus their effects on idiopathic anal pruritus remains questionable [54, 55].

Another breakthrough is being seen in the use of JAK/STAT signaling axis inhibitors. They act by disturbing immune cell cytokine release and have been used in managing several other autoimmune diseases and even COVID-19 infection [46, 56, 57]. The main adverse event is increased severe infection rate [58]. Mostly investigated agents for pruritus are baricitinib, abrocitinib, upadacitinib and tofacitinib, however, currently they have been tested mainly on patients with atopic dermatitis [59,60,61,62]. Additionally topical forms of JAK inhibitors could be beneficial to patients with anal pruritus. A phase 2 randomized trial by Kim et al. investigated the use of ruxolitinib on atopic dermatitis patients. They concluded that significant effects of ruxolitinib begin to appear after 2 weeks of use and the maximum efficacy is achieved by week 4. Moreover, in a phase 3 trial, Nakagawa et al. showed that delgocitinib ointment can significantly improve patients modified Eczema Area and Severity Index scores, reaching the maximum efficacy by week 4. Importantly both topical agents had limited adverse events [63, 64].

The research into the disruption of opioid system showed that µ receptor antagonists and κ receptor agonists may be used in controlling chronic itch [65]. The µ receptor antagonists, namely naloxone and naltrexone have been developed to treat opioid induced adverse effects. However, as Lee et al. showed, naltrexone can be also advantageous in managing chronic pruritus of various origin [66]. In their study, naltrexone greatly reduced pruritus intensity to 13 of the 18 (72.2%) included patients that had pruritus of different etiologies. The κ receptor agonists (nalfurafine and difelikefalin) are relatively new agents and have been mainly tested in reducing uremic pruritus on patients undergoing hemodialysis [67,68,69]. Additionally, nalbuphine acting as both a κ agonists and µ antagonists, was effective in treating uremic pruritus and prurigo nodularis [70, 71].

Although initial results of these novel treatment agents are promising, further research is warranted to determine their safety and effectiveness for treating idiopathic anal pruritus.

Conclusion

Anal pruritus is a chronic condition which can affect quality of life. It can be difficult to establish the primary cause as pruritus often is secondary to underlying condition. Thorough history and examination should be performed for the best possible treatment. Treatment consists of a stepwise approach focusing mainly on patient education and the use of topical agents.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hanno R, Murphy P. Pruritus ani. Classif manag Dermatol Clin. 1987;5:811–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30725-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laurent A, Boucharlat J, Bosson JL, et al. Psychological assessment of patients with idiopathic pruritus ani. Psychother Psychosom. 1997;66:163–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000289128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hadasik K, Arasiewicz H, BrzezińskaWcisło L. Assessment of the anxiety and depression among patients with idiopathic pruritus ani. Psychother. 2021;38:689–93. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2021.108906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Umanskiy K, Messaris E, et al. Dermatology and Pruritus Ani. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Hyman N, et al., editors. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 311–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths CEM, Barker J, Bleiker TO, et al. Dermatoses of Perineal and Perianal Skin In Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology 9th Edition. 9th ed. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell Publishing; 2016. p. 1131–11333.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Ortega AE, Delgadillo X. Idiopathic pruritus ani and acute perianal dermatitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32:327–32. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allan A, Ambrose NS, Silverman S, Keighley MR. Physiological study of pruritus ani. Br J Surg. 1987;74:576–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800740710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Pryde A, Bartolo DCC. Abnormal transient internal sphincter relaxation in idiopathic pruritus ani: physiological evidence from ambulatory monitoring. Br J Surg. 2005;81:603–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800810442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel GL, Longo WE, Vernava AM. Pruritus ani: causes and concerns. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:670–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Siddiqi S, Vijay V, Ward M, et al. Pruritus Ani. Annals. 2008;90:457–63. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588408X317940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasseri YY, Osborne MC. Pruritus ani. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:801–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2013.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen AD, Vander T, Medvendovsky E, et al. Neuropathic scrotal pruritus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:61–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.04.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Havlickova B, Weyandt GH. Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:1388–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Markell KW, Billingham RP. Pruritus ani: etiology and management. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:125–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith LE, Henrichs D, McCullah RD. Prospective studies on the etiology and treatment of pruritus ani. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25:358–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibarra J. Threadworms: a starting point for family hygiene. Br J Community Nurs. 2001;6:414–20. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2001.6.8.7058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldman L, Kitzmiller KW. Perianal atrophoderma from topical corticosteroids. Arch Dermatol. 1973;107:611–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1973.01620190083022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beck DE, Wexner SD, Rafferty JF. Perianal Dermatologic Disease. In: Gordon and Nivatvongs’ Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. 4th ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2018. p. 222–37.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kränke B, Trummer M, Brabek E, et al. Etiologic and causative factors in perianal dermatitis: results of a prospective study in 126 patients. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006;118:90–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-006-0529-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maisonneuve P, Botteri E, Lowenfels AB. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:710. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abu-Asi MJ, White IR, McFadden JP, White JML. Patch testing is clinically important for patients with peri-anal dermatoses and pruritus ani. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74:298–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ständer S, Weisshaar E, Mettang T, et al. Clinical classification of itch: a position paper of the international forum for the study of itch. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007;87:291–4. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuehn HG, Gebbensleben O, Hilger Y, Rohde H. Relationship between anal symptoms and anal findings. Int J Med Sci. 2009. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.6.77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ansari P. Pruritus ani. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29:038–42. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tomi N, Weiser R, Strohal R, Mittlboeck M. A liquid-film forming acrylate cream for the treatment of anal pruritus. Br J Nurs. 2012;21:98–102. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.2.98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weyandt G, Breitkopf C, Werner RN, et al. German S1 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of perianal dermatitis (anal eczema). J Deutsche Derma Gesell. 2020;18:648–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Murie JA, Sim AJ, Mackenzie I. The importance of pain, pruritus and soiling as symptoms of haemorrhoids and their response to haemorrhoidectomy or rubber band ligation. Br J Surg. 1981;68:247–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800680409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brunner MJ. Pruritus ani and anal hygiene. Arch Dermatol. 1960;82:267. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1960.01580020109028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oztas MO. Idiopathic perianal pruritus: washing compared with topical corticosteroids. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:295–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2003.013045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shocket E. Anal cleansing vs. irritation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1176–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jensen SL. A randomised trial of simple excision of non-specific hypertrophied anal papillae versus expectant management in patients with chronic pruritus ani. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988;70:348–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Patel T, Yosipovitch G. Therapy of pruritus. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11:1673–82. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2010.484420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Anand P. Capsaicin and menthol in the treatment of itch and pain: recently cloned receptors provide the key. Gut. 2003;52:1233–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.52.9.1233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Ghnaniem R, Short K, Pullen A, et al. 1% Hydrocortisone ointment is an effective treatment of pruritus ani: a pilot randomized controlled crossover trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0325-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Suys E. Randomized study of topical tacrolimus ointment as possible treatment for resistant idiopathic pruritus ani. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:327–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hercogová J. Topical anti-itch therapy: topical anti-itch therapy. Dermatol Ther. 2005;18:341–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2005.00033.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kirsner RS, Heffernan MP, Antaya R. Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment versus pimecrolimus cream in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis previously treated with corticosteroids. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90:58–64. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0748.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lysy J. Topical capsaicin—a novel and effective treatment for idiopathic intractable pruritus ani: a randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study. Gut. 2003;52:1323–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.52.9.1323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Samalavicius NE, Klimasauskiene V, Dulskas A. Intradermal 1% methylene blue injection for intractable idiopathic pruritus ani—a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22:846–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Eusebio EB, Graham J, Mody N. Treatment of intractable pruritus ani. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:770–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Samalavicius NE, Poskus T, Gupta RK, Lunevicius R. Long-term results of single intradermal 1 % methylene blue injection for intractable idiopathic pruritus ani: a prospective study. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:295–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0846-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim JH, Kim DH, Lee YP. Long-term follow-up of intradermal injection of methylene blue for intractable, idiopathic pruritus ani. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23:143–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01934-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Botterill ID, Sagar PM. Intra-dermal methylene blue, hydrocortisone and lignocaine for chronic, intractable pruritus ani. Colorect Dis. 2002;4:144–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00329.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fransiska D, Jeo WS, Moenadjat Y, Friska D. Methylene blue effectiveness as local analgesic after anorectal surgery: a literature review. Adv Med. 2017;2017:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3968278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim BS. The translational revolution of itch. Neuron. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Misery L, Brenaut E, Pierre O, et al. Chronic itch: emerging treatments following new research concepts. Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178:4775–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fourzali K, Golpanian RS, Yosipovitch G. Dupilumab use in atopic dermatitis and beyond in skin diseases. Immunotherapy. 2020;12:1221–35. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2020-0175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gael M, Adam T, Mariano-Bourin M, Bursztejn Ac. Efficacy of dupilumab in chronic prurigo and chronic idiopathic pruritus: a systematic review of current evidence and analysis of response predictors. Acad Dermatol Venereol jdv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Calugareanu A, Jachiet M, Tauber M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of prurigo nodularis in a French multicenter adult cohort of 16 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e74–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15957.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Jeon J, Wang F, Badic A, Kim BS. Treatment of patients with chronic pruritus of unknown origin with dupilumab. J Dermatol Treat. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2021.1880542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bonnekoh H, Butze M, Metz M. Characterization of the effects on pruritus by novel treatments for atopic dermatitis. J Deutsche Derma Gesell. 2022;20:150–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Roh YS, Choi J, Sutaria N, et al. IL-31 inhibition as a therapeutic approach for the management of chronic pruritic dermatoses. Drugs. 2021;81:895–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-021-01521-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kabashima K, Matsumura T, Komazaki H, Kawashima M. Trial of nemolizumab and topical agents for atopic dermatitis with pruritus. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:141–50. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1917006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ständer S, Yosipovitch G, Legat FJ, et al. Trial of nemolizumab in moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:706–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1908316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Levy G, Guglielmelli P, Langmuir P, Constantinescu S. JAK inhibitors and COVID-19. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e002838. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-002838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tanaka Y, Luo Y, O’Shea JJ, Nakayamada S. Janus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: a mechanisms-based approach. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18:133–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bechman K, Subesinghe S, Norton S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of infection risk with small molecule JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2019;58:1755–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez087.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Simpson EL, Lacour J-P, Spelman L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:242–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18898.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, et al. Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1101–12. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2019380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. The Lancet. 2021;397:2151–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Bissonnette R, Papp KA, Poulin Y, et al. Topical tofacitinib for atopic dermatitis: a phase II a randomized trial. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:902–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Nakagawa H, Nemoto O, Igarashi A, et al. Delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and an open-label, long-term extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:823–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kim BS, Sun K, Papp K, et al. Effects of ruxolitinib cream on pruritus and quality of life in atopic dermatitis: results from a phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, vehicle- and active-controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:1305–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Elmariah S, Chisolm S, Sciascia T, Kwatra SG. Modulation of the kappa and mu opioid axis for the treatment of chronic pruritus: a review of basic science and clinical implications. JAAD Int. 2022;7:156–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2022.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lee J, Shin JU, Noh S, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of naltrexone combination therapy in older patients with severe pruritus. Ann Dermatol. 2016;28:159. https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2016.28.2.159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fishbane S, Jamal A, Munera C, et al. A phase 3 trial of difelikefalin in hemodialysis patients with pruritus. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:222–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1912770.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Deeks ED. Difelikefalin: first approval. Drugs. 2021;81:1937–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-021-01619-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kumagai H, Ebata T, Takamori K, et al. Effect of a novel kappa-receptor agonist, nalfurafine hydrochloride, on severe itch in 337 haemodialysis patients: a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:1251–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfp588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Mathur VS, Kumar J, Crawford PW, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nalbuphine ER tablets for uremic pruritus. Am J Nephrol. 2017;46:450–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Weisshaar E, Szepietowski JC, Bernhard JD, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral nalbuphine extended release in prurigo nodularis: results of a phase 2 randomized controlled trial with an open-label extension phase. Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:453–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17816.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MJ and AD performed the literature search and the drafting of the manuscript. MJ drew the figure and table. Both authors reviewed and agreed upon the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrius Dulskas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakubauskas, M., Dulskas, A. Evaluation, management and future perspectives of anal pruritus: a narrative review. Eur J Med Res 28, 57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01018-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01018-5

Keywords